This research study surveyed leaders of Area Agencies on Aging (agencies) to understand their services, training, and beliefs about serving lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) older adults. Half of the existing agencies in the United States (320) participated. Few agencies provided LGBT services or outreach. One-third had trained staff around LGBT aging and four-fifths were willing to offer training; these numbers were significantly higher for urban-based agencies. Agencies that had provided staff training and urban-based agencies were more likely to provide LGBT outreach and services, to believe in addressing LGBT issues, and to receive LGBT assistance requests. Training, policy, organizing, and research implications are considered.
The lesbian and gay population is largely invisible in the gerontological literature and in planning and provision of aging services. A recent survey of providers of aging services in a large midwestern metropolitan area provides insight into providers' beliefs, preparation, and experience with serving old lesbian and gay people. Few agencies that participated in the study provided services targeted to this population, and some agencies were unwilling to consider their unique needs. Participating agencies generally recognized a need for greater knowledge and specific training in working with aging lesbian and gay people. Providers diverged over whether separate services should be established for the old lesbian and gay population. Providers consistently expressed values of care, inclusiveness, sensitivity, respect, and provision of service to everyone. The
Problem: Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) older adults endure discrimination from medical providers and expect it in institutional long-term care. Gender identity–based discrimination is connected to negative health outcomes and reluctance to access needed care. Objective: The aim of this study is to explore how gender identity affects TNB older adults’ fears, hopes, and plans for use of institutional long-term care. Method: Co-investigators conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 TNB older adults in Minnesota, collaboratively analyzed the results using reflexive thematic analysis, and member-checked emergent themes. Findings: Oppression is central to participants’ consideration of future long-term care. They fear mistreatment and loss of authentic gender expression and recognition in long-term care facilities. Fears of oppression factor into consideration of suicide and physical transition, although some participants hope societal shifts will lead to unbiased long-term care. Conclusion: Creation of anti-oppressive institutional and community-based long-term care options is critical to effectively serve TNB people as they age into dependence.
This study explored the relationship structure and experiences of 145 people in the United States, aged 50 and above, in long-term, same-sex relationships. A survey assessed relationship satisfaction and roles, caregiving, shared assets, and relationship protection and support. The ENRICH couple scales revealed high scores in communication, conflict resolution, and couple satisfaction. Most participants had taken steps to protect shared assets and assign legal authority to their partners. Participants expressed differing views regarding marriage. This study reveals distinctions based on gender and age that will inform practice with this population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.