Using a vital nerve terminal dye (4-Di-2-ASP) and fluorescently tagged alpha-bungarotoxin to stain postsynaptic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors, we viewed the same muscle fibers at multiple times in the sternomastoid muscle of living mice during the process of reinnervation following nerve crush. Soon after axons reenter the muscle, they precisely reoccupy the original endplate sites. However, in contrast to normal adult muscle, during the first several weeks of reinnervation, anatomical and physiological measures show that many of the endplate sites are innervated by more than one axon. Typically, one axon reinnervates the original endplate site by growing up the old Schwann cell tube while another originates as a sprout from a nearby endplate. Within 2 weeks after reinnervation nerve terminal staining shows that most of the sprouts have regressed and physiological evidence of multiple innervation has returned to the normal low level. By repeatedly observing the same endplates during the period of synapse elimination, we could directly view this phenomenon. At some endplates, nerve terminal boutons in one region of the endplate were eliminated at the same time a sprout entering that area regressed. These unoccupied sites seemed permanently eliminated as they are not subsequently occupied by sprouts from the axon remaining at the endplate. We were surprised to find that there is a corresponding permanent loss of ACh receptors within the muscle fiber membrane precisely underneath the eliminated nerve terminals. The decrease in receptors at sites of synapse elimination is due to both a selective loss of ACh receptors already incorporated into these sites and to a lack of insertion of new receptors at the same regions. These sites of pre- and postsynaptic loss, however, maintain cholinesterase staining in the basal lamina for long periods. Control experiments showed that endplates that were permanently denervated, incompletely reoccupied by reinnervating axons, or stained and viewed multiple times in normal muscle do not lose postsynaptic receptor regions. Interestingly, receptors appear to be eliminated before there is any obvious change in the staining of the overlying nerve terminal. Because of the lag between receptor and nerve terminal loss, we could predict which synaptic boutons would be eliminated by looking for lightly stained receptor regions. One interpretation of these data is that the removal or redistribution of relevant postsynaptic molecules by one innervating axon may instigate the elimination of competing terminals.

Synaptic rearrangements in developing muscle were studied by visualizing individual neuromuscular junctions in the sternomastoid muscle of living neonatal mice as they underwent the transition from multiple to single innervation. Vital staining of ACh receptors (AChRs) with rhodamine-conjugated alpha-bungarotoxin showed that while junctions were still multiply innervated (usually by two motor axons), regions of the postsynaptic membrane within each junction became depleted of receptors. Usually, several small postsynaptic areas lost AChRs in succession. In these areas, AChRs already in the membrane rapidly disappeared compared to a low level of receptor turnover elsewhere in the junction. Moreover, there was no evidence of new AChRs being inserted into these areas. Within each postsynaptic area undergoing AChR depletion, the intensity of receptor staining decreased gradually over 1-2 d. In some junctions, it appeared that AChRs were migrating away from areas being depleted of receptors. The depletion of AChRs from some sites in combination with the spreading apart of the entire receptor-rich area due to muscle fiber growth accounts for the transformation from plaque-like to branched receptor distributions at developing neuromuscular junctions. Vital staining of presynaptic motor nerve terminals at junctions whose postsynaptic AChRs were also stained showed that motor nerve terminals were lost from the same areas that were depleted of receptors postsynaptically. Postsynaptic areas began to be depleted of AChRs before there was any obvious loss of membrane or intracellular staining in the overlying nerve terminal. Only when a single innervating axon remained at a junction did loss of motor nerve terminals and underlying AChRs largely cease. That former synaptic areas could at later times be identified as uninnervated regions within a junction indicates that synapse elimination during development leaves an indelible mark on synaptic structure. These observations suggest that the withdrawal of a motor axon from a neuromuscular junction occurs as a consequence of the stepwise elimination of all of its synapses with that muscle fiber. These results also suggest that an important aspect of synaptic competition leading to axon withdrawal is the precocious loss of AChRs beneath the nerve terminals of the axon that will be eliminated. A similar early loss of AChRs beneath one axon's synapses has been shown to occur during synapse elimination in reinnervated adult muscle (Rich and Lichtman, 1989a).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

In order to study how neuromuscular junctions grow, we have repeatedly viewed the same junctions in mouse sternomastoid muscles at monthly intervals from 2 weeks to 18 months of age. Motor nerve terminals were stained with the nontoxic fluorescent dye 4-Di-2-ASP (Magrassi et al., 1987), and postsynaptic ACh receptors were labeled with fluorescently tagged alpha-bungarotoxin. Neuromuscular junctions grew primarily by expansion of existing motor nerve terminal and postsynaptic receptor regions without the addition or loss of synaptic areas. The expansion of pre- and postsynaptic specializations was precisely matched, suggesting that as neuromuscular junctions grow, the opposing specializations enlarge simultaneously. Each neuromuscular junction grew in length and width at the same rate that muscle fibers enlarged in those 2 dimensions, suggesting that junctional growth might be a mechanical consequence of muscle fiber growth. Repeated visualization of ACh receptors over time showed that previously labeled receptors spread apart in the membrane occupying a progressively larger area as muscle fibers grew. At the same time, new receptors were intercalated throughout the enlarged postsynaptic area. Thus, the growth of postsynaptic regions appears to be directly related to the expansion of the muscle fiber membrane as muscle fibers grow. The maintained alignment between growing motor nerve terminals and postsynaptic regions suggests that nerve terminal growth may be a consequence of its adhesion to growing postsynaptic specializations. This conclusion is supported by the coextensive stretching of motor nerve terminals and postsynaptic regions when muscle fibers are stretched. Thus, the growth of motor nerve terminals is coupled to the growth of postsynaptic regions, and the growth of the postsynaptic regions is in turn coupled to the growth of muscle fibers. In this way, the branching pattern of neuromuscular junctions may be stably maintained despite ongoing enlargement of synaptic area.

No abstract

Neuromuscular synapses in an androgen-sensitive muscle of sexually mature male mice were repeatedly observed over several-month intervals in normal animals and in animals in which testosterone levels were manipulated. In normal bulbocavernosus muscles, pre- and postsynaptic regions of neuromuscular junctions enlarge as muscle fibers grow. After castration, junctional area decreased in parallel with muscle fiber atrophy. When testosterone was resupplied to castrated animals, junctions that previously decreased in size then enlarged in parallel with muscle fiber hypertrophy. Surprisingly, these size changes occurred without loss or addition of motor nerve terminal branches or acetylcholine (ACh) receptor regions. Rather, each nerve terminal branch and underlying receptor region became smaller following castration and reenlarged following testosterone treatment. Several lines of evidence argued that the size changes observed after castration and testosterone treatment were secondary to shrinkage and stretching of the postsynaptic muscle fiber membrane. Following castration, the spaces between synaptic regions decreased in size at the same time and to a similar extent as the regions themselves. Following testosterone replacement, the spaces between synaptic regions expanded and each existing ACh receptor region enlarged. Ultrastructural analysis showed that there was no loss or addition of postsynaptic secondary junctional folds in the muscle fiber membrane (where ACh receptors are located) as junctions shrank and expanded. Rather, folds became more densely packed as muscle fibers atrophied following castration and less densely packed as muscle fibers hypertrophied following testosterone replacement. From these studies of the bulbocavernosus muscle, as from our previous studies of the sternomastoid muscle, we conclude that neuromuscular junction size is directly coupled to muscle fiber size. Androgens modulate muscle fiber volume directly, leading to a change in the surface area of the muscle fiber membrane, which in turn causes the postsynaptic specializations to shrink or expand. The concomitant shrinkage and stretching of motor nerve terminals that we observed can only be accounted for by their adhesion to postsynaptic specializations that are also changing size. Thus adhesion, rather than an interchange of diffusible factors, trophic or otherwise, is likely to be the primary determinant of coordinated pre- and postsynaptic enlargement in growing mammalian skeletal muscles.

1. The organization of motor units in the single‐fibre‐thick transversus abdominis muscle of the garter snake has been studied. This small segmental muscle (60‐100 fibres) contains three distinct fibre types (faster twitch, F; slower twitch, S; and tonic, T) which are predominantly arranged in the repeating pattern F, T, S, T, F, T, etc. 2. Motor‐unit maps were obtained by activating an individual motor axon and identifying all of the muscle fibres innervated by that axon, using either the activity‐induced uptake of extracellular marker molecules to label presynaptic terminals of the stimulated axon, or systematic intracellular recording to identify muscle fibres activated by the axon. 3. Each muscle contained three types of motor units (F, T and S) that corresponded to the three types of fibres. All of the muscle fibres in a motor unit were of the same type. Each segmental muscle contained approximately the same number of motor units: one to two faster twitch, three to four slower twitch, and three tonic. 4. Each motor unit was dispersed widely throughout the muscle. Fibres within a motor unit were neither clustered nor anticlustered. This suggests that despite the fact that axons are constrained to innervate fibres of the appropriate type, the distribution of each motor unit does not generate the alternating pattern of fibre types. 5. In several experiments, all of the twitch motor units in one segmental component of the muscle were mapped. The projection of any one axon appeared random not only with respect to the muscle's fibre type pattern, but also with respect to the innervation supplied by other axons. 6. Twitch motor units were arranged according to a hierarchy of sizes. In each muscle examined, the largest motor unit was faster twitch; a single faster twitch motor axon usually innervated all of the faster twitch fibres in the muscle (fourteen to twenty‐four fibres). This was followed by three to four slower twitch motor units which varied in size from eight to ten fibres to very small motor units containing only four to five fibres. 7. Each tonic motor axon innervated an average of ninety‐three end‐plates per segmental muscle. The relatively large size of tonic motor units compared to twitch motor units is related to the ability of tonic muscle fibres to retain polyneuronal innervation into adulthood, both by providing five to seven end‐plate sites per fibre, and by allowing terminal boutons from different tonic motor axons to co‐innervate the same end‐plate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The snake transversus abdominis muscle is an extremely simple segmentally repeating muscle containing 80 to 100 muscle fibers in a single-fiber-thick sheet. This muscle exhibits a striking pattern of muscle fiber types: twitch fibers alternate with tonic fibers and, among the twitch fibers, slower and faster contracting subtypes also alternate. Thus, in many regions of the muscle the pattern of fiber types is: faster twitch, tonic, slower twitch, tonic, faster twitch, tonic, and so on. The existence of a spatial pattern of fiber types, perhaps discernible in this muscle because of the muscle's extreme geometrical simplicity, provides good evidence for an intrinsic component to muscle fiber differentiation.

The principal aim of this work was to better understand how regenerating muscle fibers become innervated in adult animals. To induce muscle regeneration, individual identified muscle fibers in a mouse were damaged with a laser focused through a microscope. The muscle fiber that degenerated and the muscle fiber that was formed in its place were followed by viewing the same site repeatedly over a period of 2 d to 40 weeks. Commonly, the nerve terminal innervating the irradiated muscle fiber partially retracted during muscle fiber degeneration, and then sprouted to innervate the regenerating muscle fiber at the same site it had previously innervated the muscle fiber that was damaged. During the early phase of muscle regeneration we also observed sprouts originating from nerve terminals on adjacent muscle fibers. The new nerve growth was a response to the regenerating muscle fiber rather than to the degenerated fiber it replaced because repeated damage of the same site every 2–3 d over a 10 d period (to prevent regeneration) did not cause any sprouting. The direction of the sprouts on adjacent muscle fibers showed a bias toward the regenerating muscle fiber, although they avoided the region occupied by the original nerve terminal. Forty percent of the sprouts managed to reach the regenerated fiber. Nonetheless, by 11 d after muscle fiber damage, all sprouts had regressed, leaving the new fiber innervated by the same motor axon that innervated the fiber that was damaged. On the other hand, when the overlying nerve terminal as well as the muscle fiber was damaged, the sprouts from nearby muscle fibers were both more numerous and more stable, and in five cases we observed two or more new synaptic junctions on the regenerating fiber originating from different axons. In one case we witnessed a protracted competition between the original motor axon as it sprouted back and the sprouts from nearby junctions for sole innervation of the regenerate. Ultimately, the surviving sprouts myelinated and became the permanent and exclusive input to the new fiber. These results indicate that regenerating muscle fibers emit a signal that induces directional sprouting from nearby undamaged nerve terminals. Reinnervation of the regenerating muscle fiber by one axon apparently prevents the maintenance of such neurites. Because the process of muscle regeneration shares many features in common with myogenesis during embryonic development, it is likely that developing muscle fibers present an analogous stimulus to ingrowing motor axons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)