Obesity is a risk factor for operative treatment. This study examined the impact of obesity and associated comorbidities on complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Altogether, 1581 consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstones underwent LC between the years 1995 and 2008. Preoperative data and operative outcome of the 437 obese patients [302 with body mass index (BMI) 30 to 35 kg/m² and 135 with BMI ≥ 35.1 kg/m²] and 1144 nonobese controls (BMI ≤ 29.9 kg/m²) undergoing LC were compared. The impact of obesity, diabetes, cholecystitis, coronary heart disease, pulmonary disease, hypertension, and renal insufficiency on the postoperative outcome was analyzed by using multiple logistic regression analysis. The percentage of obese patients undergoing LC did not change during the study period. Over half of obese patients (63%) had 1 or multiple comorbidities, but only 15% of the patients had an acute surgery because of cholecystitis. Conversion to open surgery was required in 11.7% of the obese patients compared with 6.1% in the nonobese controls (P=0.0003). Acute cholecystitis increased the conversions in class II and III obese patients (50%) compared with elective surgery (8.7%, P<0.001). Mortality rate was 0 in obese patients and the rate of complications, except surgical site infections, comparable with nonobese patients. In multivariate analysis, obesity or any of the comorbidities did not associate with an elevated risk for postoperative complications. In symptomatic gallstone disease, obesity and related comorbidities increased the conversion rate, but not the operative risks of LC.

ObjectiveTo estimate scent dogs’ diagnostic accuracy in identification of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We conducted a randomised triple-blinded validation trial, and a real-life study at the Helsinki-Vantaa International Airport, Finland.MethodsFour dogs were trained to detect COVID-19 using skin swabs from individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Our controlled triple-blinded validation study comprised four identical sets of 420 parallel samples (from 114 individuals tested positive and 306 negative by RT-PCR), randomly presented to each dog over seven trial sessions. In a real-life setting the dogs screened skin swabs from 303 incoming passengers all concomitantly examined by nasal swab SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Our main outcomes were variables of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) for scent dog identification in comparison with RT-PCR.ResultsOur validation experiments had an overall accuracy of 92% (95% CI 90% to 93%), a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI 89% to 94%) and a specificity of 91% (95% CI 89% to 93%) compared with RT-PCR. For our dogs, trained using the wild-type virus, performance was less accurate for the alpha variant (89% for confirmed wild-type vs 36% for alpha variant, OR 14.0, 95% CI 4.5 to 43.4). In the real-life setting, scent detection and RT-PCR matched 98.7% of the negative swabs. Scant airport prevalence (0.47%) did not allow sensitivity testing; our only SARS-CoV-2 positive swab was not identified (alpha variant). However, ad hoc analysis including predefined positive spike samples showed a total accuracy of 98% (95% CI 97% to 99%).ConclusionsThis large randomised controlled triple-blinded validation study with a precalculated sample size conducted at an international airport showed that trained scent dogs screen airport passenger samples with high accuracy. One of our findings highlights the importance of continuous retraining as new variants emerge. Using scent dogs may present a valuable approach for high-throughput, rapid screening of large numbers of people.

Activin A has previously been associated with cancer cachexia and in vitro resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. We studied circulating activin A concentrations as well as activin B and their antagonists' follistatin/follistatin-like 3 in presurgical patients with nonesmall-cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. We found that circulating activing A levels were elevated in malignant pleural mesothelioma and associated with cancer cachexia and poor response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Circulating activing A separated nonesmall-cell lung cancer from benign lung lesion. Background: Previous preclinical studies have shown that activin A is overexpressed in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), associates with cancer cachexia, and is observed in in vitro resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. We evaluated circulating activin levels and their endogenous antagonists' follistatin/follistatin-like 3 in intrathoracic tumors. Materials and Methods: Patients suspected of thoracic malignancy were recruited prior to surgery. Serum samples were collected from 21 patients with MPM, 59 patients with nonesmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 22 patients with benign lung lesions. Circulating activin/follistatin levels were measured using enzymelinked immunosorbent assay and compared with clinicopathologic parameters. Results: Circulating activin A levels were elevated in patients with MPM when compared with patients with NSCLC or benign lung lesion samples (P < .0001). Also, follistatin and follistatin-like 3 levels were the highest in MPM, although with less difference compared with activin A. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for activin A for separating NSCLC from benign lung lesion showed an area under the curve of 0.856 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.94). Activin A levels were higher in patients with cachexia (P < .001). In patients with MPM, activin A levels correlated positively with computed tomographybased baseline tumor size (R ¼ 0.549; P ¼ .010) and the change in tumor size after chemotherapy (R ¼ 0.743; P ¼ .0006). Patients with partial response or stable disease had lower circulating activin A levels than the ones with progressive disease (P ¼ .028). Conclusion: Activin A serum level could be used as a biomarker in differentiating malignant and benign lung tumors. Circulating activin A levels were elevated in MPM and associates with cancer cachexia and reduced chemotherapy response.

No abstract

In this study, we demonstrate a novel approach for MPM tumor size evaluation that has a strong relationship with mortality, sarcomatoid histology and TNM stage groups. TS could be used for prognostic purposes and it may be a useful method for assessing therapy responses.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), first described in late 2019, is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In COVID-19, mortality is mainly caused by acute respiratory failure, whereas morbidity has been described for all major organ systems. 1 Verified secondary bacterial infections in COVID-19 are rare, although antimicrobials are commonly used empirically. 2 A case report of a 60-year-old obese male patient with epiglottitis and subsequent positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was published by Fondaw et al 3 . This patient had initially presented with dyspnea and stridor and had to undergo emergency cricothyroidotomy for acute epiglottitis. The initial SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was negative, but on day two the chest X-ray showed signs consistent with COVID-19 pneumonitis and a repeat test confirmed COVID-19. The patient's condition improved, and he could be weaned off the ventilator on day seven.Here, we present a second case of likely COVID-19associated epiglottitis. | CASE REPORTA 29-year-old man without pre-existing medical conditions tested COVID-19 positive after having headache, fatigue, and mild rhinitis. Within a week, his COVID-19 symptoms improved. After an asymptomatic period of 12 days, the patient developed throat pain. He was referred to the Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (ORL-HNS) Emergency Department at Helsinki University Hospital due to respiratory distress and muffled voice three weeks after the first symptoms associated with COVID-19 infection. His general health status was good, and vital signs were stable. Nasofiberoscopy showed a hyperemic epiglottis that was swollen asymmetrically. Yellowish, pus-like fluid existed in

Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a fatal malignancy strongly associated with previous asbestos exposure. Overall survival remains dismal partly due to poor response to available treatment. Aims of this study were to evaluate diagnostic accuracy in a group of MPM patients with an unusually long survival time and to assess the factors related to this prolonged survival.Materials and Methods: Forty-three patients with overall survival exceeding 5 years were accepted to the long-term survivor (LTS) group, and these patients were compared with 84 epithelial MPM patients.Data were collected from various national registers and electronic medical records. In addition, all available histopathological diagnostic samples and computed tomography studies were re-evaluated by experienced specialists.Results: Our study showed a good diagnostic accuracy, with only one patient (0.5%) having an incorrect MPM diagnosis. Two localized malignant mesotheliomas (0.9%) and two well-differentiated papillary mesotheliomas (0.9%) were also found. LTS patients were younger, more frequently females, had a better performance status at time of diagnosis, and had less evidence of prior asbestos exposure. In multivariate analysis, we showed tumor size, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and first-line treatment (both surgery and chemotherapy) to be associated with survival time. Conclusion:We confirmed the diagnosis of MPM in an overwhelming majority of patients in the LTS group. An epithelial subtype of MPM behaving clinically more indolently seems to exist, but further tumor and genetic characterization is needed. The prolonged survival time is most likely explained by a combination of tumor-, patient-, and treatment-related factors.

We report the first long-term follow-up of a randomized trial (NCT04978259) addressing the effects of remdesivir on recovery (primary outcome) and other patient-important outcomes one year after hospitalization resulting from COVID-19. Of the 208 patients recruited from 11 Finnish hospitals, 198 survived, of whom 181 (92%) completed follow-up. At one year, self-reported recovery occurred in 85% in remdesivir and 86% in standard of care (SoC) (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.47-1.90). We infer no convincing difference between remdesivir and SoC in quality of life or symptom outcomes (p > 0.05). Of the 21 potential long-COVID symptoms, patients reported moderate/major bother from fatigue (26%), joint pain (22%), and problems with memory (19%) and attention/concentration (18%). In conclusion, after a one-year follow-up of hospitalized patients, one in six reported they had not recovered well from COVID-19. Our results provide no convincing evidence of remdesivir benefit, but wide confidence intervals included possible benefit and harm.