Glutathione is a major cellular thiol that is maintained in the reduced state by glutathione reductase (GR), which is encoded by two genes in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; GR1 and GR2). This study addressed the role of GR1 in hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) responses through a combined genetic, transcriptomic, and redox profiling approach. To identify the potential role of changes in glutathione status in H 2 O 2 signaling, gr1 mutants, which show a constitutive increase in oxidized glutathione (GSSG), were compared with a catalase-deficient background (cat2), in which GSSG accumulation is conditionally driven by H 2 O 2 . Parallel transcriptomics analysis of gr1 and cat2 identified overlapping gene expression profiles that in both lines were dependent on growth daylength. Overlapping genes included phytohormone-associated genes, in particular implicating glutathione oxidation state in the regulation of jasmonic acid signaling. Direct analysis of H 2 O 2 -glutathione interactions in cat2 gr1 double mutants established that GR1-dependent glutathione status is required for multiple responses to increased H 2 O 2 availability, including limitation of lesion formation, accumulation of salicylic acid, induction of pathogenesis-related genes, and signaling through jasmonic acid pathways. Modulation of these responses in cat2 gr1 was linked to dramatic GSSG accumulation and modified expression of specific glutaredoxins and glutathione S-transferases, but there is little or no evidence of generalized oxidative stress or changes in thioredoxin-associated gene expression. We conclude that GR1 plays a crucial role in daylength-dependent redox signaling and that this function cannot be replaced by the second Arabidopsis GR gene or by thiol systems such as the thioredoxin system.

Leaf metabolism produces H2O2 at high rates, but current concepts suggest that the potent signalling effects of this oxidant require that concentrations be controlled by a battery of antioxidative enzymes. The extent to which H2O2 is allowed to accumulate remains unclear. There is little consensus on leaf H2O2 values in the literature and measured concentrations in unstressed conditions range from 50-5000 nmol g(-1) fresh weight, a difference that probably reflects technical inaccuracies as much as biological variability. This article uses new experimental and literature data to examine some of the difficulties in accurately measuring H2O2 in leaf extracts. Potential problems relate to sensitivity, interference from other redox-active compounds, and H2O2 stability during sample preparation. Particular attention is drawn to the influence of tissue mass/extraction volume in the quantitative estimation of H2O2 contents, and the possibility that this factor could contribute to the variability of literature data.