Spindle alignment is the process in which the two spindle poles are directed toward preselected and opposite cell ends. In budding yeast, the APC-related molecule Kar9 is required for proper alignment of the spindle with the mother-bud axis. We find that Kar9 localizes to the prospective daughter cell spindle pole. Kar9 is transferred from the pole to cytoplasmic microtubules, which are then guided in a myosin-dependent manner to the bud. Clb4/Cdc28 kinase phosphorylates Kar9 and accumulates on the pole destined to the mother cell. Mutations that block phosphorylation at Cdc28 consensus sites result in localization of Kar9 to both poles and target them both to the bud. Thus, Clb4/Cdc28 prevents Kar9 loading on the mother bound pole. In turn, asymmetric distribution of Kar9 ensures that only one pole orients toward the bud. Our results indicate that Cdk1-dependent spindle asymmetry ensures proper alignment of the mitotic spindle with the cell division axis.

Microtubules and actin filaments interact and cooperate in many processes in eukaryotic cells, but the functional implications of such interactions are not well understood. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, both cytoplasmic microtubules and actin filaments are needed for spindle orientation. In addition, this process requires the type V myosin protein Myo2, the microtubule end–binding protein Bim1, and Kar9. Here, we show that fusing Bim1 to the tail of the Myo2 is sufficient to orient spindles in the absence of Kar9, suggesting that the role of Kar9 is to link Myo2 to Bim1. In addition, we show that Myo2 localizes to the plus ends of cytoplasmic microtubules, and that the rate of movement of these cytoplasmic microtubules to the bud neck depends on the intrinsic velocity of Myo2 along actin filaments. These results support a model for spindle orientation in which a Myo2–Kar9–Bim1 complex transports microtubule ends along polarized actin cables. We also present data suggesting that a similar process plays a role in orienting cytoplasmic microtubules in mating yeast cells.

Cell division is the result of two major cytoskeletal events: partition of the chromatids by the mitotic spindle and cleavage of the cell by the cytokinetic apparatus. Spatial coordination of these events ensures that each daughter cell inherits a nucleus. Here we show that, in budding yeast, capture and shrinkage of astral microtubules at the bud neck is required to position the spindle relative to the cleavage apparatus. Capture required the septins and the microtubule-associated protein Kar9. Like Kar9-defective cells, cells lacking the septin ring failed to position their spindle correctly and showed an increased frequency of nuclear missegregation. Microtubule attachment at the bud neck was followed by shrinkage and a pulling action on the spindle. Enhancement of microtubule shrinkage at the bud neck required the Par-1-related, septin-dependent kinases (SDK) Hsl1 and Gin4. Neither the formin Bnr1 nor the actomyosin contractile ring was required for either microtubule capture or microtubule shrinkage. Together, our results indicate that septins and septin-dependent kinases may coordinate microtubule and actin functions in cell division.

Spatial coordination of the cell-division axis with cellular polarity and/or with the position of neighboring cells is crucial for embryonic development, organogenesis and tissue homeostasis. In most cell types, the position of the mitotic spindle at the onset of anaphase dictates the orientation of the division axis; in unicellular organisms, it plays an important role in chromosome segregation. Cortical factors play a key role in the orientation of the spindle. Recent data from yeast reveal that the spindle does not passively react to cortical signals but actively interprets them to find its correct position. We review the data leading to a 'compass model' for spindle positioning and discuss its potential generality.During cell division, the position of the spindle within the cell dictates whether polarized factors become symmetrically or asymmetrically segregated between daughter cells (Figure 1). In many cell types, polarized factors comprise cell-fate determinants. Asymmetric segregation of these factors is an important mechanism for the generation of cell diversity in multi and unicellular organisms. Misorientation of the spindle severely impairs the segregation of fate determinants and hence development.During spindle positioning, spindle rotation ensures the targeting of the two centrosomes to opposite ends of the cell and thereby the alignment of the spindle with the axis of polarity (Box 1). Other spindle movements include displacement towards the edge of the cell, leading to different sizes of the daughter cells. Here, we focus on the mechanisms of spindle alignment. Using Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans as models, many laboratories have identified several factors involved in this process. These factors provide cortical cues to orientate the spindle, participate in the cortical capture and/or pulling of astral microtubules (MTs) and govern the movement of spindle poles within the cell. How this leads to differential positioning of centrosomes to different cellends is unclear. Data from budding yeast indicate that, depending on the spindle pole from which they emanate, astral MTs have distinct abilities to interact with different cortical sites. This suggests that the asymmetry of the mitotic spindle is a prerequisite for the interpretation of cortical polarity by the spindle. Here, we review the yeast data implicating spindle asymmetry in spindle orientation.The possibility that related mechanisms are also used in higher eukaryotes are also discussed.Spindle positioning: the role of the cortex Model organisms are powerful tools to study the role of cortical polarity in spindle movements during development. During the first division of the C. elegans embryo, the mitotic spindle aligns with the anterio -posterior axis of the oocyte. A rotation by 908 that occurs in the resulting posterior cell reorientates the spindle along the anterioposterior axis of the embryo [1][2][3]. Groundbreaking experiments by Tony Hyman established that, in C. elegans, interaction of astral MTs with the cor...

Muscle LIM protein (MLP) is constitutively expressed in slow, but undetectable in fast, muscles of the rat. Here we show that MLP was upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels under experimental conditions leading to transitions from fast to slower phenotypes. Chronic low-frequency stimulation and mechanical overloading by synergist removal both induced fast-to-slow shifts in myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms and expression of MLP in fast muscles. High amounts of MLP mRNA and protein were also present in fast muscles of the myotonic, hyperactive ADR mouse. Hypothyroidism evoked shifts in myosin composition toward slower isoforms and increased the MLP protein content of soleus (SOL) muscle but failed to induce MLP in fast muscles. Unweighting by hindlimb suspension elicited slow-to-fast transitions in MHC expression without altering MLP levels in SOL muscle. Hyperthyroidism shifted the MHC pattern toward faster isoforms but did not affect MLP content in SOL muscle. We conclude that alterations in MLP expression are associated with transitions from fast to slower phenotypes but not with slow-to-fast muscle fiber transitions.