Recent developments of whole-brain models have demonstrated their potential when investigating resting-state brain activity. However, it has not been systematically investigated how alternating derivations of the empirical structural and functional connectivity, serving as the model input, from MRI data influence modelling results. Here, we study the influence from one major element: the brain parcellation scheme that reduces the dimensionality of brain networks by grouping thousands of voxels into a few hundred brain regions. We show graph-theoretical statistics derived from the empirical data and modelling results exhibiting a high heterogeneity across parcellations. Furthermore, the network properties of empirical brain connectomes explain the lion’s share of the variance in the modelling results with respect to the parcellation variation. Such a clear-cut relationship is not observed at the subject-resolved level per parcellation. Finally, the graph-theoretical statistics of the simulated connectome correlate with those of the empirical functional connectivity across parcellations. However, this relation is not one-to-one, and its precision can vary between models. Our results imply that network properties of both empirical connectomes can explain the goodness-of-fit of whole-brain models toempirical data at a global group but not a single-subject level, which provides further insights into the personalisation of whole-brain models.
Neuronal networks in rodent primary visual cortex (V1) can generate oscillations in different frequency bands depending on the network state and the level of visual stimulation. High-frequency gamma rhythms, for example, dominate the network's spontaneous activity in adult mice but are attenuated upon visual stimulation, during which the network switches to the beta band instead. The spontaneous local field potential (LFP) of juvenile mouse V1, however, mainly contains beta rhythms and presenting a stimulus does not elicit drastic changes in network oscillations. We study, in a spiking neuron network model, the mechanism in adult mice allowing for flexible switches between multiple frequency bands and contrast this to the network structure in juvenile mice that lack this flexibility. The model comprises excitatory pyramidal cells (PCs) and two types of interneurons: the parvalbumin-expressing (PV) and the somatostatinexpressing (SOM) interneuron. In accordance with experimental findings, the pyramidal-PV and pyramidal-SOM cell subnetworks are associated with gamma and beta oscillations, respectively. In our model, they are both generated via a pyramidal-interneuron gamma (PING) mechanism, wherein the PCs drive the oscillations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that large but not small visual stimulation activates SOM cells, which shift the frequency of resting-state gamma oscillations produced by the pyramidal-PV cell subnetwork so that beta rhythms emerge. Finally, we show that this behavior is obtained for only a subset of PV and SOM interneuron projection strengths, indicating that their influence on the PCs should be balanced so that they can compete for oscillatory control of the PCs. In sum, we propose a mechanism by which visual beta rhythms can emerge from spontaneous gamma oscillations in a network model of the mouse V1; for this mechanism to reproduce V1 dynamics in adult mice, balance between the effective strengths of PV and SOM cells is required.
✶ ❉♦♥❞❡rs ❈❡♥tr❡ ❢♦r ◆❡✉r♦s❝✐❡♥❝❡✱ |❛❞❜♦✉❞ ❯♥✐✈❡rs✐t②✱ ◆✐•♠❡❣❡♥✱ ❚❤❡ ◆❡t❤❡r•❛♥❞s ✯❈♦rr❡s♣♦♥❞❡♥❝❡✿ ♣✳t✐❡s✐♥❣❛❅s❝✐❡♥❝❡✳r✉✳♥• ◆❡✉r♦♥❛• ♥❡t✇♦r❦s ✐♥ r♦❞❡♥t ♣r✐♠❛r② ✈✐s✉❛• ❝♦rt❡① ✭❱✶✮ ❝❛♥ ❣❡♥❡r❛t❡ ♦s❝✐••❛t✐♦♥s ✐♥ ❞✐✛❡r✲ ❡♥t ❢r❡q✉❡♥❝② ❜❛♥❞s ❞❡♣❡♥❞✐♥❣ ♦♥ t❤❡ ♥❡t✇♦r❦ st❛t❡ ❛♥❞ t❤❡ •❡✈❡• ♦❢ ✈✐s✉❛• st✐♠✉•❛t✐♦♥✳ ❍✐❣❤✲ ❢r❡q✉❡♥❝② ❣❛♠♠❛ r❤②t❤♠s✱ ❢♦r ❡①❛♠♣•❡✱ ❞♦♠✐✲ ♥❛t❡ t❤❡ ♥❡t✇♦r❦✬s s♣♦♥t❛♥❡♦✉s ❛❝t✐✈✐t② ✐♥ ❛❞✉•t ♠✐❝❡ ❜✉t ❛r❡ ❛tt❡♥✉❛t❡❞ ✉♣♦♥ ✈✐s✉❛• st✐♠✉•❛t✐♦♥✱ ❞✉r✐♥❣ ✇❤✐❝❤ t❤❡ ♥❡t✇♦r❦ s✇✐t❝❤❡s t♦ t❤❡ ❜❡t❛ ❜❛t✐❝ str❡♥❣t❤✳ ■♥tr♦❞✉❝t✐♦♥ ❖✈❡r t❤❡ ♣❛st ❞❡❝❛❞❡✱ t❤❡ ♣r✐♠❛r② ✈✐s✉❛• ❝♦rt❡① ✭❱✶✮ ♦❢ ♠✐❝❡ ❤❛s ❜❡❡♥ ✐♥t❡♥s✐✈❡•② st✉❞✐❡❞ ✉s✐♥❣ tr❛♥s❣❡♥✐❝ t❡❝❤♥✐q✉❡s✳ ❉✐st✐♥❝t s✉❜t②♣❡s ♦❢ ✐♥❤✐❜✐t♦r② ✐♥t❡r♥❡✉r♦♥s t❤❛t ✉s❡ ❣❛♠♠❛✲❛♠✐♥♦❜✉t②r✐❝ ❛❝✐❞ ✭•❆❇❆✮ ❛s ♥❡✉r♦✲ tr❛♥s♠✐tt❡r ✇❡r❡✱ ❢♦r ❡①❛♠♣•❡✱ ✐❞❡♥t✐✜❡❞ ❛♥❞ •✐♥❦❡❞ t♦ ✈❛r✐♦✉s s♣✐❦✐♥❣ ❜❡❤❛✈✐♦rs ❬✶✱ ✷(✳ ❚❤❡s❡ ❞✐✛❡r❡♥t s✉❜♣♦♣✲ ✉•❛t✐♦♥s ❛•s♦ ❤❛✈❡ s♣❡❝✐✜❝ ❝♦♥♥❡❝t✐✈✐t② ♣❛tt❡r♥s ✇✐t❤ r❡✲ s♣❡❝t t♦ ♦♥❡ ❛♥♦t❤❡r❀ ♣❛r✈❛•❜✉♠✐♥✲❡①♣r❡ss✐♥❣ ✭P❱✮ ✐♥✲ t❡r♥❡✉r♦♥s ❛r❡ ♠✉t✉❛••② ✐♥❤✐❜✐t❡❞ ❛♥❞ r❡❝❡✐✈❡ ✐♥❤✐❜✐t✐♦♥ ❢r♦♠ s♦♠❛t♦st❛t✐♥✲❡①♣r❡ss✐♥❣ ✭❙❖▼✮ ❝❡••s✱ ✇❤✐•❡ t❤❡ •❛t✲ t❡r s✉❜t②♣❡ ♣r✐♠❛r✐•② r❡❝❡✐✈❡s ✐♥❤✐❜✐t✐♦♥ ❢r♦♠ ✈❛s♦❛❝✲ t✐✈❡ ✐♥t❡st✐♥❛• ♣❡♣t✐❞❡ ❡①♣r❡ss✐♥❣ ✭❱■P✮ ✐♥t❡r♥❡✉r♦♥s ❬✸(✳ ❚❤❡s❡ s✉❜t②♣❡✲s♣❡❝✐✜❝ ❝♦♥♥❡❝t✐♦♥ ♠♦t✐❢s ❛•s♦ ❤❛✈❡ ❛♥ ❛❞❞✐t✐♦♥❛• ❣❡♦♠❡tr✐❝ ❝♦♠♣♦♥❡♥t✿ P❱ ✐♥t❡r♥❡✉r♦♥s ✐♥ ❝♦rt✐❝❛• •❛②❡r ✷ ❛♥❞ ✸ ✭▲✷✴✸✮ ♣r❡❞♦♠✐♥❛♥t•② r❡❝❡✐✈❡ ✈❡r✲ t✐❝❛• ✐♥♣✉ts ♦r✐❣✐♥❛t✐♥❣ ❢r♦♠ ❝♦rt✐❝❛• •❛②❡r ✹ ✭▲✹✮ ❝♦♠✲ ♣❛r❡❞ t♦ ❤♦r✐③♦♥t❛• ♦♥❡s ❢r♦♠ ♦t❤❡r ▲✷✴✸ ❝❡••s✱ ✇❤❡r❡❛s t❤❡ ♦♣♣♦s✐t❡ ✐s tr✉❡ ❢♦r ❙❖▼ ❝❡••s ❛s t❤❡s❡ r❡❝❡✐✈❡ ♠♦r❡ ❤♦r✐③♦♥t❛••② t❤❛♥ ✈❡rt✐❝❛••② ❛•✐❣♥❡❞ ✐♥♣✉ts ❬✹(✳ ❚❤✐s ♣❛rt✐❝✉•❛r s✉❜t②♣❡✲s♣❡❝✐✜❝ ❛rr❛♥❣❡♠❡♥t ♦❢ t❤❡ ❛✲ ❛♥❞ ❡✛❡r❡♥ts ✇✐t❤✐♥ t❤❡ ♥❡t✇♦r❦ ♣r♦❜❛❜•② ✉♥❞❡r•✐❡s t❤❡ ❞✐✛❡r❡♥t s②♥❝❤r♦♥✐③❛t✐♦♥ r❡❣✐♠❡s t❤❛t ❤❛✈❡ ❜❡❡♥ ♦❜✲ s❡r✈❡❞ ✐♥ ♠♦✉s❡ ❱✶ ❬✺✱ ✻✱ ✼(✳ ❖♥❡ ♦❢ t❤❡s❡ ❝❤❛♥❣❡s ✐s t❤❡ ❛tt❡♥✉❛t✐♦♥ ♦❢ ❣❛♠♠❛ ♦s❝✐••❛t✐♦♥s ✇❤❡♥ ✈✐s✉❛••② st✐♠✉•❛t✐♥❣ t❤❡ ❛❞✉•t ♠♦✉s❡❀ s②♥❝❤r♦♥✐③❛t✐♦♥ ✐s ✐♥st❡❛❞ ❛❝❤✐❡✈❡❞ ✐♥ t❤❡ ❜❡t❛ ❢r❡q✉❡♥❝② ❜❛♥❞ ✭❋✐❣✉r❡ ✶❈✕❉✮ ❬✺✱ ✻(✳ ❚❤❡ ❡①t❡♥t t♦ ✇❤✐❝❤ ❣❛♠♠❛ ❛♥❞ ❜❡t❛ r❤②t❤♠s ❛r❡ ❞❡❝r❡❛s❡❞ ❛♥❞ ❡♥❤❛♥❝❡❞✱ r❡s♣❡❝t✐✈❡•②✱ ❞❡♣❡♥❞s ♦♥ t❤❡ s✐③❡ ♦❢ t❤❡ st✐♠✉•✉s✱ ✇❤✐❝❤ •❡❞ t♦ t❤❡ ❤②♣♦t❤❡s✐s t❤❛t ❛♥ ✐♥❤✐❜✐t♦r② s✉rr♦✉♥❞ ❡✛❡❝t ✉♥❞❡r•✐❡s t❤✐s s✇✐t❝❤ ✐♥ s②♥❝❤r♦♥② ❬✹✱ ✻(✳ ❚❤❡s❡ ❣❛♠♠❛ ♦s❝✐••❛t✐♦♥s ❛r❡ ♥♦t ♣r❡s❡♥t ✐♥ ②♦✉♥❣❡r ♠✐❝❡ ❛s t❤❡② ❞❡✈❡•♦♣ ❞✉r✐♥❣ t❤❡ ❝r✐t✐❝❛• ♣❡r✐♦❞ ✭❈P✮ ✭❋✐❣✉r❡ ✶❆✮✱ ❛ ♣❡r✐♦❞ ✇❡••✲❦♥♦✇♥ ❢♦r ✐ts ✐♥❝r❡❛s❡❞ •❡✈❡•s ♦❢ ♦❝✉•❛r ❞♦♠✐♥❛♥❝❡ ♣•❛st✐❝✐t② ❬✺✱ ✽(✳ ❋✉rt❤❡r♠♦r❡✱ ❜❡❢♦r❡ t❤❡ ❈P✱ ✈✐s✉❛• st✐♠✉•❛t✐♦♥ ❞♦❡s ♥♦t ❛•t❡r t❤❡ ♥❡t✇♦r❦✬s s②♥❝❤r♦♥✐③❛t✐♦♥ ❢r❡q✉❡♥❝②✱ ❡✈❡♥ t❤♦✉❣❤ ❜❡t❛ ♣♦✇❡r ✐s st✐•• s•✐❣❤t•② ❡♥❤❛♥❝❡❞ ✭❋✐❣✲ ✉r❡ ✶❇✮ ❬✺(✳ ❲❤❛t ❡①❛❝t•② ✐♥✐t✐❛t❡s t❤❡ ❞❡✈❡•♦♣♠❡♥t ♦❢ ❣❛♠♠❛ r❤②t❤♠s ❞✉r✐♥❣ t❤✐s t✐♠❡ ✇✐♥❞♦✇ ✐s ✉♥❝•❡❛r✱ ❜✉t P❱ ❝❡••s ❛r❡ •✐❦❡•② ✐♥✈♦•✈❡❞✿ st✉❞✐❡s ✉s✐♥❣ ♦♣t♦❣❡♥❡t✐❝ ♣❡rt✉r❜❛t✐♦♥s ✐♥❞✐❝❛t❡ t❤❛t P❱ ❛♥❞ ❙❖▼ ❝❡••s ❝❛♥ ❜❡ ❛ss♦❝✐❛t❡❞ ✇✐t❤ t❤❡ ❣❛♠♠❛ ❛♥❞ ❜❡t❛ ♦s❝✐••❛t✐♦♥s✱ r❡s♣❡❝✲ t✐✈❡•② ❬✻✱ ✾✱ ✶✵(✳ P❱ ❝❡•• ♣r♦❣❡♥✐t♦rs tr❛♥s♣•❛♥t❡❞ ✐♥t♦ t❤❡ ❱✶ ♦❢ ❛❞✉•t ♠✐❝❡ ❞✐✛❡r❡♥t✐❛t❡ ✐♥t♦ t❤❡ P❱ ✭❤❡♥❝❡ ♥♦t t❤❡ ❙❖▼✮ s✉❜t②♣❡✱ ✐♥t❡❣r❛t❡ s✉❝❝❡ss❢✉••② ✐♥ t❤❡ ♥❡t✇♦r❦ ❛♥❞ ✐♥✐t✐❛t❡ ❛ ♣❡r✐♦❞ ✇✐t❤ ❡♥❤❛♥❝❡❞ ♣•❛st✐❝✐t② t❤❛t r❡✲ s❡♠❜•❡s t❤❡ ❈P ❬✶✶✱ ✶✷(✳ ❚❤❡...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.