Summary
A combination of an oral beta-adrenergic blocking agent and verapamil has been advocated as a safe treatment for angina. A case of Wenckebach type atrioventricular block occurring in a patient on metoprolol and verapamil is reported. It is suggested that this combination is used with caution.
Objectives The use of postoperative anticoagulation is not uncommon for patients undergoing lower extremity arterial procedures as adjunctive therapy. Longer postoperative length of stay is necessary to achieve adequate therapeutic international normalized ratio with traditional protocols that call for the use of unfractionated heparin and warfarin therapy. We hypothesized the direct oral anticoagulants are an attractive alternative to provide adequate anticoagulation in patients who undergo lower extremity arterial procedures. Methods We retrospectively studied patients who had lower extremity arterial procedures between 2012 and 2015 to examine the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants in a single institution. Patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were evaluated. The direct oral anticoagulant agents used included dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. The primary patency, adverse effects and freedom from re-intervention were then compared to a control group of patients who were treated with traditional heparin-warfarin therapy after lower extremity bypass procedures. Results Direct oral anticoagulants were utilized in a total of 23 patients (48% men; mean age 69 ± 11 years) during the study period. Indication for use of direct oral anticoagulant after procedure included use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass graft below the knee joint or after lower extremity angioplasty with disadvantaged runoff. Mean follow-up of the drugs was 23 months (SD ± 16 months). At the end of follow-up, the direct oral anticoagulants have been discontinued in four patients, who are currently only on plavix. Among 82.6% of patients who were given direct oral anticoagulants for PTFE bypasses, graft patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. Patients (17.4%) treated with direct oral anticoagulants for disadvantaged runoff after balloon angioplasty of the lower extremity, patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. For the patients who underwent direct oral anticoagulant administration for disadvantaged runoff primary patency was 100%. One patient developed wound dehiscence which was unrelated to direct oral anticoagulant administration. Our control group consisted of 100 patients who were treated with heparin-warfarin therapy for 30 days after lower extremity bypass procedures. The graft patency, freedom from intervention, and major adverse limb event were 93%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. There was however no statistically significant difference in graft patency rate ( P = .34) or freedom from intervention ( P = .07) between the two groups. Conclusions The preliminary data suggest that there may be a role for using the direct oral anticoagulants with patients who undergo lower extremity arterial procedures for prevention of thrombosis and warrants further investigation.
Objectives Treatment options for venous insufficiency are rapidly evolving in the office setting and include venography, intravascular ultrasound, and venous stenting. Non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions assessment and treatment in an office setting is currently an area of interest. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of evaluating non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion with this office-based procedure in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Methods From January 2012 through December 2013, 300 non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion limbs in 192 patients with venous insufficiency ≥80 years old were evaluated for non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion. Patients were evaluated and treated with venography, intravascular ultrasound, and stent placement for significant lesions demonstrated by greater than 50% diameter or cross-sectional area reduction. Group 1: 168 of these patients were octogenarians; female/male ratio was 1.75:1, bilateral in 89/168 patients (53%), left sided in 131/259 limbs (51%), right sided in 128 limbs (49%), average age 83.5 ± 2.6 years (range 80-89) compared to Group 2: 24 nonagenarians; female/male was 3:1, bilateral in 17/24 patients (70%), left sided in 20/41 limbs (49%), right sided in 21/41 limbs (51%), average age 92.9 ± 2.2 years (range 90-99). Stent related outcomes were evaluated with communication to the patient within 24 h to assess post-procedure pain followed by serial iliocaval ultrasonography. Results Out of the 300 limbs evaluated, in Group 1, 86% of limbs had stents placed compared to 90% in Group 2 and 11% of both groups had two stents placed. Overall improvement in pain, edema, and ulcers was reported in 147 (59%) of octogenarians and 24 (65%) of nonagenarians. There were no surgical site infections, pseudo-aneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, or femoral artery injuries. No patients required transfusion within three days post-operatively and there were no 30-day mortalities in both sets of patients. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that there is no statistical difference in the outcome of performing venography, intravascular ultrasound, and stent placement in an office-based setting in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Both groups maintained a similar safety profile with low morbidity and mortality. In conclusion, we believe that the treatment of non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion in an office-based setting is safe and efficacious in both groups.
than the stent type. Racial and regional disparities in cost were observed after controlling for patient factors. This is the first study to show comparable cost between DES and BMS. More liberal use of DES for patients with CLI might be appropriate if favorable durability is confirmed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.