The novel coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) that began in the late part of 2019 in Wuhan, China has created significant challenges for higher education. Since the inception of COVID-19 research and practice in the higher education discipline, there has continued to be a focus on exploring its effects in localised contexts. The place-based context, while useful in enhancing individual practice, limits the potential to examine the pandemic from a broader lens. There are for many of us, shared examples of good practice that can serve to collectively improve the higher education sector during and beyond the pandemic. This Special Issue came about as an effort to reinvigorate collaboration across jurisdictional boundaries in a discipline environment characterised by exponential growth in local case studies. This Editorial explores the role that we can play in supporting collaboration among researchers as both a process and end-product to support innovation in the university learning and teaching domain. We believe this Special Issue provides a curated cornerstone for the future of COVID-19 in higher education research. This work, contributed from each corner of the globe seeks to understand not just what is occurring now, but what might occur in the future. We find inspiration in the manuscripts within this Special Issue as they provide innovative responses to the pandemic and opportunities for us to collectively grow to better support academics, students, employers, and communities. We hope you find benefit in progressing through this knowledge dissemination project.

Commonly used design codes for power plant components and pressure vessels include rules for ratcheting analysis that specify limits on accumulated strain. No guidance is provided on the use of the material model. The objective of the paper is to provide guidance that may be helpful to analysts. The Chaboche nonlinear kinematic (NLK) hardening material model is chosen as an appropriate model. Two methods are selected for its calibration that can determine the parameters for stainless steels. One is manual that requires no outside software and the other uses finite element software. Both are based on the monotonic stress–strain curve obtained from a tension specimen. The use of the Chaboche parameters for cases when ratcheting is caused by cyclic temperature fields is selected as the example of an application. The conclusion is that the number of allowable design cycles is far higher when using the parameters with temperature dependency than those at the constant maximum temperature that is being cycled.

A B S T R A C T Analysis of welded structures still remains a challenge for the analyst and in fact cannot be considered as fully solved for practical applications. For many years, a large international aggregation of researchers has developed methods to assess fatigue behaviour of welded structures. Nowadays many suggestions and methods exist to estimate fatigue life of welded structures with respect to nominal, structural, notch stress or fracture mechanics approaches. All of them are still under improvement. The high motivation and many activities of experts in the International Institute of Welding (IIW) group of researchers is a good demonstration of the complexity and need for analysis methods in that field. The purpose of this paper is to provide some discussion on selected methods available. Both authors are giving lectures to transfer methods to industrial applications. It is their experience that a large amount of knowledge has been developed although proper applications require some grading and comments on the use of those methods. This paper should give some comments and recommendations for the practical application of a selection of methods already available. A hierarchical two-step procedure for the assessment of large welded structures will be described and recommended. Also benchmark results are presented on a sample structure for sake of comparison of a few selected methods. Finally a presentation of results obtained by application of selected methods on real structures in comparison with fatigue lives from experiments will be presented. The methods selected within the paper cover the approaches for modelling, structural analysis and assessment of welded structures using finite element analysis (FEA) and stress based concepts for fatigue life estimation. a = weld throat thickness e = element size e 1 = element size of 1st row of elements adjacent to hot spot e 2 = element size of 2nd row of elements adjacent to hot spot k = slope of component fatigue curve l 1 , l 2 , l 3 = distances for structural stress assessment using extrapolation schemes r CAB = weld radius according to CAB concept t = wall thickness A = area F x = force in x-direction F y = force in y-direction K t,r=1 = notch factor for weld toe radius r = 1 mm Correspondence: K. Rother.

No abstract

No abstract

Two calibration processes are selected for determining the parameters of the Chaboche nonlinear kinematic hardening (NLK) material model for stainless steel. One process is manual that requires no outside software and the other follows a finite element software. The basis of the calibration is the monotonic stress-strain curve obtained from a tension specimen subjected to unidirectional loading. The Chaboche model is meant for elastic-plastic ratcheting analysis that is included in commonly used design codes. It is chosen because it is known that it can represent realistically the materials that are used for power plant components and pressure vessels. To test the calibration results, a pressurized cylindrical shell subjected to thermal cycling is selected as an example. It was found that, for the example, no more than four Chaboche components should be used in the determination of its parameters.

Applicable design codes for power plant components and pressure vessels demand for a design check against progressive plastic deformation. In the simplest case, this demand is satisfied by compliance with shakedown rules in connection with elastic analyses. The possible non-compliance implicates the requirement of ratcheting analyses on elastic-plastic basis. In this case, criteria are specified on maximum allowable accumulated growth strain without clear guidance on what material models for cyclic plasticity are to be used. This is a considerable gap and a challenge for the practicing CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) engineer. As a follow-up to two independent previous papers PVP2013-98150 ASME [1] and PVP2014-28772 [2] it is the aim of this paper to close this gap by giving further detailed recommendation on the appropriate application of the nonlinear kinematic material model of Chaboche on an engineering scale and based on implementations already available within commercial finite element codes such as ANSYS® and ABAQUS®. Consistency of temperature-dependent runs in ANSYS® and ABAQUS® is to be checked. All three papers together constitute a comprehensive guideline for elasto-plastic ratcheting analysis. The following issues are examined and/or referenced: • Application of monotonic or cyclic material data for ratcheting analysis based on the Chaboche material model • Discussion of using monotonic and cyclic data for assessment of the (non-stabilized) cyclic deformation behavior • Number of backstress terms to be applied for consistent ratcheting results • Consideration of the temperature dependency of the relevant material parameters • Consistency of temperature-dependent runs in ANSYS® and ABAQUS® • Identification of material parameters dependent on the number of backstress terms • Identification of material data for different types of material (carbon steel, austenitic stainless steel) including the appropriate determination of the elastic limit • Quantification of conservatism of simple elastic-perfectly plastic behavior • Application of engineering versus true stress-strain data • Visual checks of data input consistency • Appropriate type of allowable accumulated growth strain. This way, a more accurate inelastic analysis methodology for direct practical application to real world examples in the framework of the design code conforming elasto-plastic ratcheting check is proposed.

No abstract