Purpose To mitigate spatial flip angle (FA) variations under strict specific absorption rate (SAR) constraints for ultra‐high field MRI using a combination of universal parallel transmit (pTx) pulses and fast subject‐specific optimization. Methods Data sets consisting of B0, B1+ maps, and virtual observation point (VOP) data were acquired from 72 subjects (study groups of 48/12 healthy Europeans/Asians and 12 Europeans with pathological or incidental findings) using an 8Tx/32Rx head coil on a 7T whole‐body MR system. Combined optimization values (COV) were defined as combination of spiral‐nonselective (SPINS) trajectory parameters and an energy regularization weight. A set of COV was optimized universally by simulating the individual RF pulse optimizations of 12 training data sets (healthy Europeans). Subsequently, corresponding universal pulses (UPs) were calculated. Using COV and UPs, individually optimized pulses (IOPs) were calculated during the sequence preparation phase (maximum 15 s). Two different UPs and IOPs were evaluated by calculating their normalized root‐mean‐square error (NRMSE) of the FA and SAR in simulations of all data sets. Seven additional subjects were examined using an MPRAGE sequence that uses the designed pTx excitation pulses and a conventional adiabatic inversion. Results All pTx pulses resulted in decreased mean NRMSE compared to a circularly polarized (CP) pulse (CP = ~28%, UPs = ~17%, and IOPs = ~12%). UPs and IOPs improved homogeneity for all subjects. Differences in NRMSE between study groups were much lower than differences between different pulse types. Conclusion UPs can be used to generate fast online‐customized (FOCUS) pulses gaining lower NRMSE and/or lower SAR values.

Purpose: Parallel transmit technology for MRI at 7 tesla will significantly benefit from high performance transmit arrays that offer high transmit efficiency and low mutual coupling between the individual array elements. A novel dual-mode transmit array with nested array elements has been developed to support imaging the human brain in both the single-channel (sTx) and parallel-transmit (pTx) excitation modes of a 7 tesla MRI scanner. In this work, the design, implementation, validation, specific absorption rate (SAR) management, and performance of the head coil is presented.Methods: The transmit array consisted of a nested arrangement to improve decoupling between the second-neighboring elements. Two large cut-outs were introduced in the RF shield for an open-face design to reduce claustrophobia and to allow patient monitoring. A hardware interface allows the coil to be used in both the sTx and pTx modes. SAR monitoring is done with virtual observation points (VOP) derived from human body models. The transmit efficiency and coverage is compared with the commercial single-channel and parallel-transmit head coils.Results: Decoupling inductors between the second-neighboring coil elements reduced the coupling to less than −20 dB. Local SAR estimates from the electromagnetic (EM) simulations were always less than the EM-based VOPs, which in turn were always less than scanner predictions and measurements for static and dynamic pTx waveforms. In sTx mode, we demonstrate improved coverage of the brain compared to the commercial sTx coil. The transmit efficiency is within 10% of the commercial pTx coil despite the two large cut-outs in the RF shield. In pTx mode, improved signal homogeneity was shown when the Universal Pulse was used for acquisition in vivo.Conclusion: A novel head coil which includes a nested eight-channel transmit array has been presented. The large cut-outs improve patient monitoring and reduce claustrophobia. For pTx mode, the EM simulation and VOP-based SAR management provided greater flexibility to apply pTx methods without the limitations of SAR constraints. For scanning in vivo, the coil was shown to provide an improved coverage in sTx mode compared to a standard commercial head coil.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background: Due to the absence of robust biomarkers, and the low sensitivity and specificity of routine imaging techniques, the differential diagnosis between Parkinson’s disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) is challenging. High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) opened up new possibilities regarding the analysis of pathological alterations associated with neurodegenerative processes. Recently, we have shown that quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) enables visualization and quantification of two major histopathologic hallmarks observed in MSA: reduced myelin density and iron accumulation in the basal ganglia of a transgenic murine model of MSA. It is therefore emerging as a promising imaging modality on the differential diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndromes. Objectives: To assess QSM on high-field MRI for the differential diagnosis of PD and MSA. Methods: We assessed 23 patients (nine PDs and 14 MSAs) and nine controls using QSM on 3T and 7T MRI scanners at two academic centers. Results: We observed increased susceptibility in MSA at 3T in prototypical subcortical and brainstem regions. Susceptibility measures of putamen, pallidum, and substantia nigra reached excellent diagnostic accuracy to separate both synucleinopathies. Increase toward 100% sensitivity and specificity was achieved using 7T MRI in a subset of patients. Magnetic susceptibility correlated with age in all groups, but not with disease duration in MSA. Sensitivity and specificity were particularly high for possible MSA, and reached 100% in the putamen. Conclusion: Putaminal susceptibility measures, in particular on ultra-high-field MRI, may distinguish MSA patients from both, PD and controls, allowing an early and sensitive diagnosis of MSA.

No abstract

To evaluate the benefits and challenges of dynamic parallel transmit (pTx) pulses for fat saturation (FS) and water-excitation (WE), in the context of CEST MRI. Methods: "Universal" k T -points (for FS) and spiral non-selective (for WE) trajectories were optimized offline for flip angle (FA) homogeneity. Routines to optimize the pulse shape online, based on the subject's fields maps, were implemented (target FA of 110 • /0 • for FS, 0 • /5 • for WE at fat/water frequencies). The pulses were inserted in a CEST sequence with a pTx readout. The different fat suppression schemes and their effects on CEST contrasts were compared in 12 volunteers at 7T. Results: With a 25%-shorter pulse duration, pTx FS largely improved the FA homogeneity (root-mean-square-error (RMSE) = 12.3 • vs. 53.4 • with circularly-polarized mode, at the fat frequency). However, the spectral selectivity was degraded mainly in the cerebellum and close to the sinuses (RMSE = 5.8 • vs. 0.2 • at the water frequency). Similarly, pTx WE showed a trade-off between FA homogeneity and spectral selectivity compared to pTx non-selective pulses (RMSE = 0.9 • and 1.1 • at the fat and water frequencies, vs. 4.6 • and 0.5 • ). In the brain, CEST metrics were reduced by up to 31.9% at −3.3 ppm with pTx FS, suggesting a mitigated lipid-induced bias. Conclusion: This clinically compatible implementation of dynamic pTx pulses improved the fat suppression homogeneity at 7T taking into account the subject-specific B 0 heterogeneities online. This study highlights the lipid-induced biases on the CEST z-spectrum. The results are promising for body applications where B 0 heterogeneities and fat are more substantial.

To investigate the effects of using different parallel-transmit (pTx) head coils and specific absorption rate (SAR) supervision strategies on pTx pulse design for ultrahigh-field MRI using a 3D-MPRAGE sequence. Methods:The PTx universal pulses (UPs) and fast online-customized (FOCUS) pulses were designed with pre-acquired data sets (B 0 , B 1 + maps, specific absorption rate[SAR] supervision data) from two different 8 transmit/32 receive head coils on two 7T whole-body MR systems. For one coil, the SAR supervision model consisted of per-channel RF power limits. In the other coil, SAR estimations were done with both per-channel RF power limits as well as virtual observation points (VOPs) derived from electromagnetic field (EMF) simulations using three virtual human body models at three different positions. All pulses were made for nonselective excitation and inversion and evaluated on 132 B 0 , B 1 + , and SAR supervision datasets obtained with one coil and 12 from the other. At both sites, 3 subjects were examined using MPRAGE sequences that used UP/FOCUS pulses generated for both coils.Results: For some subjects, the UPs underperformed when simulated on a different coil from which they were derived, whereas FOCUS pulses still showed acceptable performance in that case. FOCUS inversion pulses outperformed adiabatic pulses when scaled to the same local SAR level. For the self-built coil, the use of VOPs showed reliable overestimation compared with the ground-truth EMF simulations, predicting about 52% lower local SAR for inversion pulses compared with per-channel power limits. Conclusion:FOCUS inversion pulses offer a low-SAR alternative to adiabatic pulses and benefit from using EMF-based VOPs for SAR estimation. K E Y W O R D Sfast online customized (FOCUS) pulses, parallel transmission (pTx), radiofrequency (RF) coils, UHF MRI, universal pulses (UPs), virtual observation points (VOPs)Jürgen Herrler and Sydney N. Williams contributed equally to this work.