Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether heart fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) and glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB (GPBB) could be used for the accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Materials and methods: The study included 108 ACS patients admitted to a coronary unit within 3 h after chest pain onset. AMI was distinguished from unstable angina (UA) using a classical cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay. H-FABP and GPBB were measured by ELISA on admission (0 h) and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after admission; their accuracy to diagnose AMI was assessed using statistical methods. Results: From 92 patients with ACS; 71 had AMI. H-FABP and GPBB had higher peak value after 3 h from admission than cTnI (P = 0.001). Both markers normalized at 24 h. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was signifi cantly greater for both markers in AMI patients than in UA patients at all time points tested, including admission (P < 0.001). At admission, the H-FABP (37%) and GPBB (40%) sensitivities were relatively low. They increased at 3 and 6 h after admission for both markers and decreased again after 24 h. It was 40% for H-FABP and approximately 2-times lower for GPBB (P < 0.01). In AMI patients, both biomarkers had similar specifi cities, positive-and negative-predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and risk ratios for AIM. Conclusion: H-FABP and GPBB can contribute to early AMI diagnosis and can distinguish AMI from UA.

: There was no correlation between type of LVH and prevalence of VA. The severity of hypertrophy contributes more to a greater prevalence of VA than the LVH pattern. The combination of severe degree and concentric type carries the greatest cardiovascular risk.

Concentric and eccentric types of left ventricular hypertrophy have a greater impact on the frequency of atrial arrhythmias. In the concentric type the prevalence of supraventricular premature beats correlates with the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy. Patients with moderate and severe concentric and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy should be always tested using Holter monitoring and bicycle ergometry and treated with the maximum tolerable doses of antihypertensives, particularly with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers.

Objective:To investigate the possible electrophysiological background of the greater excitability of concentric and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy types in relation to the asymmetric type.Methods:187 patients with essential hypertension, without ishaemic heart disease were divided into three groups with regard to left ventricule type: concentric (relative wall thickness >0.42, interventricular septum/left ventricular posterior wall ≤1.3), eccentric (left ventricular diameter in systoles >32, relative wall thickness <0.42), asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy (interventricular septum/left ventricular posterior wall >1.3), and three subgroups: mild (interventricular septum or left ventricular posterior wall 11-12 mm), moderate (interventricular septum or left ventricular posterior wall 13-14 mm) and severe left ventricular hypertrophy (interventricular septum or left ventricular posterior wall ≥15 mm). In all patients QT intervals, QT dispersion, left ventricular mass index and ventricular arrhythmias were measured. An upper normal limit for QT corrected interval: 450/460 ms for men/women; for QT dispersion: 70 ms.Results:The QT corrected interval and QT dispersion were increased in severe concentric and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy (443 and 480 ms for QT corrected; 53 and 45 ms for QT dispersion, respectively), not significantly. QT dispersion in men with severe left ventricular hypertrophy was significantly enlarged (67.5 vs. 30 ms, p=0.047). QT interval was significantly longer in patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias (p=0.037).Conclusion:No significant association of QT intervals or QT dispersion with the degree/type of left ventricular hypertrophy was found. QT corrected interval and QT dispersion tend to increase proportionally to the left ventricular mass only in the concentric and eccentric type.

SUMMARY – According to present findings, the impact of particular arterial pressure components on the occurrence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) differs. We sought to determine which individual component of arterial pressure has the greatest impact on the LVH geometric pattern/degree. The study included 192 patients (87 men), aged 43-80 (median 68) years with hypertension and LVH. Patients were classified into three groups according to type of hypertrophy (concentric, eccentric and asymmetric) and into three subgroups according to the degree of hypertrophy (mild, moderate and severe). All patients had their blood pressure measured, and they underwent electrocardiography and echocardiography. Antihypertensive drugs and the duration of previous treatments were taken into consideration. Pulse pressure was significantly higher in patients with concentric LVH than in those with eccentric and asymmetric LVH (p=0.029), the values of which did not differ statistically. It rose with LVH degree (not significantly, p=0.217). There were no significant differences in systolic pressure among study groups (p=0.177). We concluded that pulse pressure had the greatest impact on the left ventricular geometry, particularly of the concentric type.