Background: Shear wave elastography is a promising method to diagnose early musculoskeletal lesions.We aimed to explore the feasible depth and acceptable precompression applied by probe and couplant for soft tissues in the present system.Methods: Ex-vivo muscles were evaluated at depths of 0.5-6 cm by 3 operators, using 1-5 mm couplant thickness and 0-3.0 kPa probe pressure. We compared the shear wave speed (SWS) and used intraclass correlation coefficients to assess reproducibility. In vivo skin and subcutaneous superficial fascia from volunteers were tested at depths ranging from 0.1-0.5 cm with 1-20 mm couplant thickness.
Results:The SWS of ex-vivo muscles varied and increased with depth, and could not be acquired at 6 cm because the shear wave failed to be detected. Furthermore, while the SWS of ex-vivo muscles were not affected by the couplant thickness, it was affected by probe pressure. Most cases demonstrated a satisfactory agreement degree of the intraoperator reproducibility (ICC, 0.81-0.95) and a substantial interoperator reproducibility (ICC >0.60). Inter-and intra-operator reproducibility was better at a depth of 0.5-4 cm than at 5 cm. In the in vivo study, when tissues within a 0.2 cm depth were evaluated, the SWS that was acquired using a couplant thickness of >10 mm was different from that acquired using other thicknesses.
Conclusions:The SWS acquired at a depth of ≤3 cm with a suitable amount of couplant is recommended.
Background: The application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in assessment of the musculoskeletal system is affected by various factors. This study aimed to explore the influence of machines, probes, region of interest (ROI) sizes, and the acquisition angles on muscle shear wave speed (SWS).
Methods:The SWS of ex vivo isolated muscles were acquired using 3 different machines (Aixplorer system, SuperSonic Imagine; Acuson S3000, Siemens Healthcare; Resona 7, Mindray) and 2 linear probes (Aixplorer system, SL 10-2 and SL 15-4). Also, 4 different ROI sizes (diameter 1-10 mm) and 9 different acquisition angles (0-40°) were tested. The SWS acquired under different conditions were compared, and the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate reproducibility.Results: There was a significant difference in SWS acquired using the 3 different machines (P<0.001) or with 9 different angles (P=0.008). There was no significant difference in SWS acquired using 2 probes (P=0.053) or 4 different ROI sizes (P=0.874, 0.778, and 0.865 for 3 operators, respectively). All machines produced substantial intra-system reproducibility (ICC, 0.61-0.80). Both probes demonstrated an almost perfect degree of intra-system agreement (ICC, >0.80), and nearly all ROI sizes demonstrated an almost perfect degree of intra-and inter-operator agreement (ICC, >0.80). The measurement reliability was higher when the acquisition angles were no more than 20°.
Conclusions:The 3 machines had different SWS values. Attention should be paid when comparing SWS results using different machines. For the Aixplorer system, the ROI size had no effect on the SWS values.Angles larger than 25° will lead to SWS measurements with greater variability compared to smaller angles (≤20°).
RAA with mirror-image branching can be detected via fetal echocardiography, which can reveal the relationship between of the aortic arch and the trachea and can enable the identification of the course of brachiocephalic branching. The identification of isolated RAA with mirror-image branching is crucial for distinguishing this condition from other types of aortic arch anomalies, particularly double aortic aorta, which can have a rather different prognosis.
A database of 40 different cross-sectional fetal CHDs was established. An extensive database library of fetal CHDs, from which sonographers and students can study the anatomical features of fetal CHDs and virtualize fetal echocardiography findings via either centralized training or distance education, can be established in the future by accumulating further cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.