BackgroundIntraventricular silicone oil is a relatively rare complication resulted from silicone oil tamponade to treat retinal detachment. It is occasionally reported in previous literature. To the best of our knowledge, the long-term longitudinal comparisons of silicone oil both in the brain and in the postoperative eyeball based on CT/MRI were lacking, and intraventricular silicone oil accumulation beside lesions has been reported rarely.Case presentationA 63-year-old male patient underwent an intraocular tamponade with silicone oil in June 2009. Eight CT examinations and 2 MRI examinations were acquired between 2011 and 2018.The changes of silicone oil in the brain in CT/MRI as below: Silicone oil initially migration to bilateral lateral ventricular anterior horn was found in November 2011, it was aslo found at right side of suprasellar cisterna, and there was no change in location 6 h later; Silicone oil at the anterior horn of right lateral ventricle disappeared but remained at left lateral ventricle and right side of suprasellar cisterna in July 2014, and there was no change in location in a short-term reexamination. It was found at the middle of left lateral ventricle (adjacent to the real cause) in march 2018, but disappeared 3 months later, while remained at anterior horn of left lateral ventricular and right side of suprasellar cisterna all the time. There was no change in location in the next 2 follow-up (September and October in 2018). The CT values of silicone oil distributed throughout the brain were dynamically changed with time.ConclusionIt is important to recognize intraventricular silicone oil in a particular location.More important is to discover “the real murderer”, which is the main cause of symptoms in the vicinity of special location. Moreover, the migration of silicone oil between eyeball and brain may not be always in a single direction.
Cervical computed tomography (CT) often suffers from examination failure in uncooperative patients with acute cervical spinal trauma. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using high-pitch cervical CT (HP-CT) in such populations. A total of 95 patients with acute neck/head-neck trauma who underwent HP-CT (n = 29) or standard cervical CT (SD-CT, n = 66) from October 2020 to June 2021 were included in this study. Differences in patient characteristics between the HP-CT group and the SD-CT group were firstly compared. Then, the objective image quality based on the mean score of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/contrast noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated, while double-blind five-point scoring was adopted for the subjective evaluation. Finally, radiation doses in HP-CT and SD-CT were compared. Furthermore, the Student t test and/or Mann–Whitney U test were performed to analyze differences in patient characteristics, image quality, and radiation dose between the two regimes. A total of 17 cases of cervical spine fractures were found in 95 patients, including 6 cases in the HP-CT group and 11 cases in the SD-CT group. The average age of patients who received HP-CT was higher than that of those who received SD-CT, and the scan time using HP-CT was shorter than that SD-CT. The differences were statistically significant (both, P < .05). In addition, there was no significant difference between HP-CT and SD-CT in terms of sex, body mass index, field of view (FOV), and scan length (all P > .05). The SNR/CNR at the middle and upper neck was not significantly different between HP-CT and SD-CT (all P > .05). However, the SNR/CNR at the lower neck in HP-CT was lower than that in SD-CT (all P < .05). There was no significant difference in the subjective scores between HP-CT and SD-CT images in both the soft tissue and bone window ( P = .129 and 0.649, respectively). The radiation dose in HP-CT was lower than that in SD-CT (all P < .05). With a scan time reduction of 73%, radiation dose reduction of 10%, and similar image quality, high-pitch cervical CT was of feasibility to evaluate cervical spine injury in uncooperative patients with acute cervical spine trauma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.