Background A retrospective study aimed to introduce a new method for improving the diffusion degree of bone cement and to observe its clinical efficacy in percutaneous vertebroplasty treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Methods From January 2019 to March 2020, a total of 83 patients were enrolled and reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the operation method. The clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded and compared between these two groups. Those who received percutaneous vertebroplasty with haemorrhage aspiration were recorded as group A (n=42). In group A, the haemorrhage in the vertebral fracture was aspirated compared with conventional percutaneous vertebroplasty. Patients who underwent conventional percutaneous vertebroplasty were classified as group B (n=41). Results Visual analogue scale (VAS) values and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores showed no significant difference between the two groups preoperatively, postoperatively or at the final follow-up (FU) (P>0.05). The intraoperative VAS score (bone cement injection) in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (3.83±0.79 vs 5.44±1.32, P < 0.01). The local kyphotic angle (LKA) (final follow-up), LKA loss, fractured vertebral anterior height loss (FVAHL) and anterior vertebral height loss ratio (AVHLR) were significantly lower in group A than in group B. The anterior vertebral height ratio (AVHR) at the final FU in group A was higher than that in group B (P=0.013). The distribution of bone cement was significantly different (P=0.034). By analysing the distribution pattern of bone cement, it was found that the values of LKA loss, FVAHL and AVHLR were superior in the type A bone cement distribution to those in types B and C. Conclusion Compared with traditional surgical methods, bone haemorrhage aspiration could improve the diffusion degree of bone cement and reduce the height loss and deformity of injured vertebrae. This method provides a feasible new scheme for improving the dispersion of bone cement.
Objective The type AO B2 thoracolumbar fracture is a kind of flexion‐distraction injury and the effect of disc injury on treatment results of patients with B2 fracture remains unclear. The objective of the current study was to compare and analyze the outcomes in AO Type B2 thoracolumbar fracture patients with and without disc injuries in terms of the Cobb angle of kyphosis, the incidence of complication, and the rate of implant failure. Methods This is a retrospective study. Of the 486 patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent posterior fixation, 38 patients with AO type B2 injuries were included. All the patients were divided into two groups according to changes in the adjoining discs. Disc injury group A included 17 patients and no disc injury group included 21 patients. Clinical and radiologic parameters were evaluated before surgery, after surgery, and at follow‐up. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, incidence of complications, and incidence of implant failure. Radiologic assessment was accomplished with the Cobb angle (CA), local kyphosis (LK), percentage of anterior vertebral height (AVBH%), intervertebral disc height, and intervertebral disc angle. Fisher's precision probability tests were employed and chi square test were used to compare categorical variables. Paired sample t tests and independent‐sample t tests were used to compare continuous data. Results Disc injury mainly involved the cranial disc (15/19, 78.9%). The mean follow‐up period for the patients was 30.2 ± 20.1 months. No neurologic deterioration was reported in the patients at the last follow‐up. Radiological outcomes at the last follow‐up showed significant differences in the CA (18.59° ± 13.74° vs 8.16° ± 9.99°, P = 0.008), LK (12.74° ± 8.00° vs 6.55° ± 4.89°, P = 0.006), and %AVBH (77.16% vs 90.83%, P = 0.01) between the two groups.Implant failure occurred after posterior fixation in five patients with disc injury who did not undergo interbody fusion during the initial surgery. Additionally, in the subgroup analysis, interbody fusion in the implant failure group were significantly different than in the no implant failure group (0% vs 75%, P = 0.009). Conclusions AO B2 fracture patients with disc injury have higher risk of complications, especially implant failure after posterior surgery. Interbody fusion should be considered in AO type B2 fracture patients with disc injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.