No abstract

No abstract

Intraoral removal can be performed successfully regardless of location, size, presence of infection, or recurrence of calculi, if the calculi are palpable.

Background: It is important to differentiate between schwannomas and neurofibromas for the cases in which the histopathologic features overlap. Depending on the tumor type, surgeons can decide on a treatment method and whether to preserve or sacrifice the nerve; the possibility of malignant transformation in the case of neurofibromas also needs to be considered. Methods:We studied 101 cases of schwannoma and 103 cases of neurofibroma. All the hematoxylin and eosin slides for these cases were reviewed, and tissue microarrays were prepared from the representative areas. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibodies for S-100 protein, calretinin, CD56 and CD34. Results: All the tumors except 3 neurofibromas were positive for the S-100 protein. Calretinin was found in 26.7% of the schwannomas (27/101), but it was not found in any of the neurofibromas. CD56 was positive in 77.2% of the schwannomas (78/101) and in 9.8% of the neurofibromas (10/102). CD34 was positive in 42.5% of the schwannomas (43/101) and in 80.2% of the neurofibromas (81/101). Statistically, calretinin was significantly specific for schwannomas (p< 0.001) and CD56 was also sensitive for these tumors (p < 0.001). On the other hand, a CD34 expression seemed highly sensitive (p < 0.001) for neurofibromas. Conclusions: We concluded that combined immunohistochemical analysis for calretinin, CD56, and CD34 may be very useful for differentiating schwannomas from neurofibromas.

Mouse and human melanoma cells metastatic to the brain express degradative enzyme activities that are used for invasion of brain basement membrane and parenchyma. Compared to poorly metastatic or lung- or ovary-metastatic murine melanoma lines, the brain-metastatic sublines secreted higher levels of a variety of degradative enzymes. Brain-metastatic murine and human melanoma cells also degraded subendothelial basement membrane and reconstituted basement membrane at rates higher than other metastatic melanoma cells. In some cases these degradative activities in mouse and human melanoma cells can be induced by paracrine factors known to be present in the brain parenchyma, such as nerve growth factor (NGF). NGF stimulates the expression of degradative enzymes, such as the endo-beta-glucuronidase heparanase, that are important in basement membrane penetration but this factor does not stimulate melanoma cell growth. The growth of brain-metastasizing melanoma cells appears to be stimulated by other paracrine growth factors, such as paracrine transferrin. Melanoma cells metastatic to brain express higher numbers of transferrin receptors and respond and proliferate at lower concentrations of transferrin than do melanoma cells metastatic to other sites or poorly metastatic melanoma cells. The results suggest that degradation and invasion of brain basement membrane and responses to paracrine neurotrophins and paracrine transferrins are important properties in brain metastasis of murine and human malignant melanoma cells.