No abstract

T he steroid hormone 1␣,25(OH) 2 -vitamin D 3 (1,25D) (Fig. 1A), other steroid hormones, retinoids, and thyroid hormones form the family of ligands for the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily (1), the members of which produce genomic responses through selective interaction of the liganded receptor with promoters of appropriate genes and basal transcription machinery. Many of these hormones also activate rapid, nongenomic (NG), cellular signaling cascades (2, 3) (except retinoids) that range from activation of ion channels (4, 5) to promoting kinase and other cytosolic signaling cascades (6-9). Defining the structure-function requirements for 1,25D and 17␤-estradiol (E 2 ) rapid actions has been aided by the synthesis of analogs that are NG agonists like 1␣,25(OH) 2 -lumisterol (JN) (ref. 10 and Fig. 1 A) and 4-estren-3␣,17␤-diol (EST) (11) or antagonists like 1␤,25(OH) 2 -vitamin D 3 (HL) (ref. 12 and Fig. 1 A), but that are only weak genomic transactivators (13). Thus, important structural attributes of the sterol dictate its agonistic properties and subsequent genomic vs. NG signaling profile (14, 15).When 1,25D rapid signaling cascades were first discovered, it was hypothesized that the observed activities were propagated by a novel membrane protein(s) (16), because analogs JN and HL did not compete well with [ 3 H]1,25D for binding to the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) (17). Recently, in studies using a VDR knockout (KO) mouse (18) and a naturally occurring human VDR mutation (19), 1,25D-mediated rapid responses were shown to require a functional VDR. Both the VDR and estrogen receptor (ER) have been found localized to the plasma membrane in caveolae (7, 20); therefore, it has been proposed that the VDR and ER propagate some NG signaling (6,9,18,21,22). However, given the poor affinity of JN and HL for the VDR, it is difficult to understand how these sterols can facilitate their activities through the VDR.Results obtained from the modeling (INSIGHT 2000.1) of JN, 1,25D, and HL in the VDR ligand-binding domain (LBD) showed that the VDR could possibly accept and form favorable nonbonding interactions with vitamin D sterols in a distinct ligand-binding pocket [an alternative ligand-binding pocket (A pocket)] from the genomic pocket (G pocket) that was previously defined by x-ray crystallography (23, 24). Our proposed A-pocket accepts ligands that differ in shape from those in the classical G pocket (3,23,24).The data from these models has led to the proposal that the VDR can function as a rapid response receptor through a conformational ensemble mechanism (3, 25) whereby the flexible 1,25D steroid hormone samples an ensemble of energetically similar protein conformations (26). In addition, the ensemble model and existence of an A pocket may provide an explanation for the observed sex-nonspecific, nongenotropic signaling through the ER␣ receptor by EST (3, 9, 11). The physiological relevance of the ensemble model and functional importance of an A pocket within the VDR is further substantiated by applying the m...

The steroid hormone 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)-vitamin D(3) (1,25D) regulates gene transcription through a nuclear receptor [vitamin D receptor (VDR)] and initiation of rapid cellular responses through a putative plasma membrane-associated receptor (VDR(mem)). This study characterized the VDR(mem) present in a caveolae-enriched membrane fraction (CMF), a site of accumulation of signal transduction agents. Saturable and specific [(3)H]-1,25D binding in vitro was found in CMF of chick, rat, and mouse intestine; mouse lung and kidney; and human NB4 leukemia and rat ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells; in all cases the 1,25D K(D) binding dissociation constant = 1-3 nM. Our data collectively support the classical VDR being the VDR(mem) in caveolae: 1) VDR antibody immunoreactivity was detected in CMF of all tissues tested; 2) competitive binding of [(3)H]-1,25D by eight analogs of 1,25D was significantly correlated between nuclei and CMF (r(2) = 0.95) but not between vitamin D binding protein (has a different ligand binding specificity) and CMF; 3) confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of ROS 17/2.8 cells showed VDR in close association with the caveolae marker protein, caveolin-1, in the plasma membrane region; 4) in vivo 1,25D pretreatment reduced in vitro [(3)H]-1,25D binding by 30% in chick and rat intestinal CMF demonstrating in vivo occupancy of the CMF receptor by 1,25D; and 5) comparison of [(3)H]-1,25D binding in VDR KO and WT mouse kidney tissue showed 85% reduction in VDR KO CMF and 95% reduction in VDR KO nuclear fraction. This study supports the presence of VDR as the 1,25D-binding protein associated with plasma membrane caveolae.

The relative affinities of the 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-D3) analogues 20-epi-1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (IE) and 20-epi-22-oxa-24a,26a,27a-tri-homo-1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (ID) to the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) are similar to that of 1,25-D3, but their antiproliferative action is 1000-fold greater. We tested whether the greater antiproliferative effect of these analogues is due to a differential activation of the VDR. In ROS 17/2.8 cells, the effective doses required to produce 50% maximal stimulation (ED50) of transfected reporter genes driven by either the osteocalcin or the osteopontin vitamin D-response elements (VDRE) were 5 x 10(-9) M, 10(-10) M, and 10(-11) M for 1,25-D3, ID, and IE, respectively. Similar results were obtained when recombinant human VDR was cotransfected into CV-1 cells with an osteocalcin VDRE-reporter plasmid. We found that in vitro the sensitivity of 1,25-D3-induced and analogue-induced receptors to proteases was different. The ED50 for binding to VDRE, as determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assays, was significantly higher for 1,25-D3-induced than for analogue-induced VDR. The concentration of retinoid X receptor (RXR) was significantly lower in 1,25-D3-induced than analogue-induced VDR complexes with VDRE. We therefore conclude that IE and ID augment transcriptional activity of VDR more than 1,25-D3 does, by producing conformational changes that enhance dimerization of VDR with RXR. We suggest that these conformational changes are due to differences in the contact sites of the 20-epi analogues and 1,25-D3 with the VDR.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

During normal developmental tissue growth and in a number of diseases of the cardiopulmonary system, adventitial and interstitial fibroblasts are subjected to increased mechanical strain. This leads to fibroblast activation and enhanced collagen synthesis, but the underlying mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. In this study, we have begun to identify and characterize mechanical strain-responsive elements in the rat procollagen ␣1(I) (COL1A1) gene and show that the activity of COL1A1 promoter constructs, transiently transfected into cardiac fibroblasts, was increased between 2-and 4-fold by continuous cyclic mechanical strain. This was accompanied by a ϳ3-fold increase in the levels of total active transforming growth factor-␤ (TGF-␤) released into the medium. Inclusion of a panspecific TGF-␤ neutralizing antibody inhibited straininduced COL1A1 promoter activation. Deletion analysis revealed the presence of two potential strain response regions within the proximal promoter, one of which contains an inverted CCAAT-box overlapping a GC-rich element. Both mechanical strain and exogenously added TGF-␤1 enhanced the binding activity of CCAAT-binding factor, CBF/NF-Y, at this site. Moreover, this element was sufficient to confer strain-responsiveness to an otherwise unresponsive SV40 promoter. In summary, this study demonstrates that strain-induced COL1A1 promoter activation in cardiac fibroblasts is TGF-␤-dependent and involves increased binding of CCAAT-binding factor at the proximal promoter. Furthermore, these findings suggest a novel and potentially important TGF-␤ response element in the rat COL1A1 gene.