BackgroundGefitinib was the first epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Few treatment options are available for NSCLC patients who have responded to gefitinib treatment and demonstrated tumor progression. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the 2nd EGFR-TKI administration.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 11 patients who had obtained a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) with gefitinib treatment and were re-treated with EGFR-TKI after failure of the initial gefitinib treatment.ResultsThree patients (27%) were treated with gefitinib as the 2nd EGFR-TKI, and 8 patients (73%) received erlotinib. Only one patient (9%) showed PR, 7 (64%) achieved SD, and 3 (27%) had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 73% (95% CI, 43% - 91%) and the median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2 - 5.2). The median overall survival from the beginning of the 2nd EGFR-TKI and from diagnosis were 7.3 months (95% CI, 2.7 - 13) and 36.7 months (95% CI, 23.6 - 43.9), respectively. No statistical differences in PFS or OS were observed between gefitinib and erlotinib as the 2nd EGFR-TKI (PFS, P = 0.23 and OS, P = 0.052). The toxicities associated with the 2nd EGFR-TKI were generally acceptable and comparable to those observed for the initial gefitinib therapy.ConclusionsOur results indicate that a 2nd EGFR-TKI treatment can be an effective treatment option for gefitinib responders.

No abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that most solid malignancies consist of heterogeneous tumor cells and that a relatively small subpopulation, which shares biological features with stem cells, survives through potentially lethal stresses such as chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Since the survival of this subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSC) plays a critical role in recurrence, it must be eradicated in order to cure cancer. We previously reported that vaccination with CD133(+) murine melanoma cells exhibiting biological CSC features induced CSC-specific effector T cells. These were capable of eradicating CD133(+) tumor cells in vivo, thereby curing the parental tumor. In the current study, we indicated that DEAD/H (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp/His) box polypeptide 3, X-linked (DDX3X) is an immunogenic protein preferentially expressed in CD133(+) tumor cells. Vaccination with DDX3X primed specific T cells, resulting in protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity. The DDX3X-primed CD4(+) T cells produced CD133(+) tumor-specific IFNγ and IL-17 and mediated potent antitumor therapeutic efficacy. DDX3X is expressed in various human cancer cells, including lung, colon, and breast cancer cells. These results suggest that anti-DDX3X immunotherapy is a promising treatment option in efforts to eradicate CSC in the clinical setting.

Antitumor immunity is augmented by cytotoxic lymphodepletion therapies. Adoptively transferred naive and effector T cells proliferate extensively and show enhanced antitumor effects in lymphopenic recipients. Although the impact of lymphodepletion on transferred donor T cells has been well evaluated, its influence on recipient T cells is largely unknown. The current study demonstrates that both regulatory T cells (Tregs) and effector CD8+ T cells from lymphopenic recipients play critical roles in the development of antitumor immunity after lymphodepletion. Cyclophosphamide (CPA) treatment depleted lymphocytes more efficiently than other cytotoxic agents; however, the percentage of CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ Tregs was significantly increased in CPA-treated lymphopenic mice. Depletion of these chemoresistant Tregs following CPA treatment and transfer of naive CD4+ T cells augmented the antitumor immunity and significantly suppressed tumor progression. Further analyses revealed that recipient CD8+ T cells were responsible for this augmentation. Using Rag2−/− mice or depletion of recipient CD8+ T cells after CPA treatment abrogated the augmentation of antitumor effects in CPA-treated reconstituted mice. The transfer of donor CD4+ T cells enhanced the proliferation of CD8+ T cells and the priming of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells originating from the lymphopenic recipients. These results highlight the importance of the recipient cells surviving cytotoxic regimens in cancer immunotherapies.

No abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that cancer cells possess a small subpopulation that survives during potentially lethal stresses, including chemotherapy, radiation treatment, and molecular-targeting therapy. CD133 is a putative marker that distinguishes a minor subpopulation from normal differentiated tumor cells in many cancers. Although it is necessary to eradicate all cancer cells to obtain a cure, effective treatment to eliminate the CD133(+) treatment-tolerant cells has not been elucidated. In this study, we demonstrated that a CD133(+) subpopulation in murine melanoma is immunogenic and that effector T cells specific for the CD133(+) melanoma cells mediated potent antitumor reactivity, curing the mice of the parental melanoma. CD133(+) melanoma antigens preferentially induced type 17 T helper (Th17) cells and Th1 cells but not Th2 cells. CD133(+) melanoma cell-specific CD4(+) T-cell treatment eradicated not only CD133(+) tumor cells but also CD133(-) tumor cells while inducing long-lasting accumulation of lymphocytes and dendritic cells with upregulated MHC class II in tumor tissues. Further, the treatment prevented regulatory T-cell induction. These results indicate that T-cell immunotherapy is a promising treatment option to eradicate CD133(+) drug-tolerant cells to obtain a cure for cancer.

Background: Although the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to platinum-doublet chemotherapy has improved the efficacy of first-line therapy in extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, the best treatment option for patients with recurrent SCLC has not yet been determined.We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin (AMR) therapy after treatment with ICIs. Methods:We retrospectively assessed patients with recurrent SCLC who received AMR after chemoimmunotherapy at the Niigata Lung Cancer Treatment Group from August 2019 to February 2021.Results: This analysis included 30 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.2) and 10 months (95% CI: 7.4-14.8), respectively. The median PFS and OS did not significantly differ between the sensitive and refractory groups [PFS; 3.1 months (95% CI:1.1-4.0) vs. 4.2 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.8), P=0.1142, OS; 10.0 months (95% CI: 5.2-14.8) vs. 10.4 months (95% CI: 3.8-NE), P=0.5525]. The most common adverse event was grade ≥3 neutropenia, which occurred in 22 of 30 patients (73%), and 2 patients (7%) discontinued AMR due to adverse events.Conclusions: AMR after chemoimmunotherapy shows good clinical efficacy and safety in patients with recurrent SCLC.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer is a rare cancer that occurs in approximately 5% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLCs) patients. Despite the excellent efficacy of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in ALK-positive NSCLCs, most patients experience resistance. We conducted a phase II study to investigate the combination of alectinib with bevacizumab in ALK-positive NSCLC patients after failure of alectinib. In this study, ALK-positive nonsquamous NSCLC patients previously treated with alectinib received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 every 3 weeks and alectinib 600 mg/day until disease progression. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and the safety of alectinib and bevacizumab. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and correlation of circulating tumor DNA and plasma proteins with PFS. Of the 12 patients treated, the median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI 1.2–16.1), and the median OS was 24.1 months (95% CI 8.3-not estimable). The EML4-ALK fusion gene in circulating tumor DNA was significantly correlated with shorter PFS (1.2 months vs. 11.4 months, HR 5.2, p = 0.0153). Two patients experienced grade 3 adverse events; however, none of the patients required dose reduction. Although the primary endpoint was not met, alectinib combined with bevacizumab showed clinical efficacy in ALK-positive patients.