The direct ocean current observations across the Yucatan Channel collected during the Canek program allow the best description to date of the exchange between the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. A net transport of 23.8 ± 1 Sv (1 Sv = 106m3s−1; 95% confidence interval) flowed through the Yucatan Channel from the Caribbean Sea into the Gulf of Mexico, during the period between September 1999 and June 2000. This is about 20 percent less than the 30 Sv accepted as the nominal transport of the Florida Current, and less also than the 28 Sv assumed for Yucatan in closing the transport budgets for Caribbean passages. The discrepancy may be an imbalance due to fluctuations in the transports through other passages of the system, especially the Old Bahama and Northwest Providence Channels, which remain poorly known. Our data corroborate the principal features of the flow through the Yucatan Channel: The northerly surface Yucatan Current and its southerly Under‐current off Mexico, and the southerly surface Cuban Counter‐current near Cuba; but previously unobserved mean currents are found to exist at depth, especially on the eastern side of the channel. Fluctuations seen in the deep flows are related to volume anomalies over the Gulf of Mexico. A transport through the Yucatan Channel smaller than previously thought has significant implications for the dynamics of the Gulf of Mexico and its modeling, since this transport is the principal forcing of its circulation. The circulation budgets in the Western Subtropical Atlantic should be revised considering these new results.
[1] The variability of sea surface temperature (SST) in the equatorial Atlantic is characterized by strong cooling in May-June and a secondary cooling in NovemberDecember. A numerical simulation of the tropical Atlantic is used to diagnose the different contributions to the temperature tendencies in the upper ocean. Right at the equator, the coolest temperatures are observed between 20°W and 10°W due to enhanced turbulent heat flux in the center of the basin. This results from a strong vertical shear at the upper bound of the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC). Cooling through vertical mixing exhibits a semiannual cycle with two peaks of comparable intensity. During the first peak, in May-June, vertical mixing drives the SST while during the second peak, in November-December, the strong heating due to air-sea fluxes leads to much weaker effective cooling than during boreal summer. Seasonal cooling events are closely linked to the enhancement of the vertical shear just above the core of the EUC, which appears to be not driven directly by the strength of the EUC but by the strength and the direction of the surface current. The vertical shear is maximum when the northern branch of the South Equatorial Current is intense. The surface cooling in the eastern equatorial Atlantic is not as marked as in the center of the basin. Mean thermocline and EUC rise eastward, but a strong stratification, caused by the presence of warm and low-saline surface waters, limits the vertical mixing to the upper 20 m and disconnects the surface from subsurface dynamics.
The first attempt to establish a relation between the Loop Current extension and deep flows in Yucatan Channel was made by Maul et al. [1985]; it was unsuccessful, probably because of the low spatial resolution of their observations. From September 8, 1999, to June 17, 2000, eight moorings with acoustic Doppler current profilers, current meters, and thermometers were deployed across the Yucatan Channel. The data from these arrays were used to compute time series of the transports below the level of the deepest isotherm observed in the Florida Straits, as required by a simple box model that restricts deep exchanges with the Gulf of Mexico to the Yucatan Channel. The surface extension of the Loop Current was inferred from 3 day advanced very high resolution radiometer imagery from October to May, when temperature gradients were sufficient to map the warm water unambiguously. The deep transports appear at first unrelated to the rate of change of the Loop Current extension, but filtering the series with a 20 day running mean increases the correlation between the low‐pass series to 0.62, and up to 0.83 with a lag of 8.5 days, with Loop Current changes leading the deep flows. The cumulative deep transport, a quantity that favors lower frequencies, is very well related (correlations >0.9) to the surface extension of the Loop Current, also with a lag of about a week. These lags are not statistically significant but suggest a timescale for internal adjustment processes in the Gulf of Mexico. The empirical orthogonal function of the current best related to the area extension of the Loop Current represents a unidirectional flow across the entire deep section, flowing either toward or from the Gulf of Mexico, and includes a strong expression of the Yucatan Undercurrent.
[1] The structure and variability of the velocity and temperature fields in Yucatan Channel are analyzed using data from an eight-mooring array deployed from August 1999 to June 2000. The area-averaged kinetic energy and transport fluctuations spectra show that the extrema of these quantities do not coincide, and that flow variability is dominated by highly energetic processes with weak transport contributions. Transport fluctuations peak in the 20-40 and 5-10 day period bands, but show no clear correlation with the local wind-stress forcing. Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis of the along-channel velocity component shows that approximately 55% of the total velocity variance is retained in the first two EOFs, which depict tripolar (the center of the channel is out of phase with the sides) and dipolar structures. A multivariate complex EOF analysis of low-passed temperature and velocity components suggests the tripole-dipole structures are the components of irregular oscillations of the flow, related to the northwestward propagation of anticyclones and cyclones through the channel. The weak transport signal in these modes is consistent with the eddies being advected by the mean flow. In contrast to other western boundary current regions, the passage of eddies provides the predominant explanation for the variability in the Yucatan Channel. However, the processes controlling transport variability remain unclear.
[1] Two-year-long time series of current and density structure measurements across the Yucatan Channel's main section allow the calculation of the time-dependent potential vorticity flux between the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, which is characterized by alternating periods of positive (cyclonic) and negative (anti-cyclonic) vorticity influx. Periods of negative cumulative vorticity influx are related to the Loop Current extending into the Gulf of Mexico, whereas periods of positive cumulative vorticity influx relate to a Loop Current retraction, sometimes coincident with the shedding of an anti-cyclonic eddy.INDEX TERMS: 4520
We construct a Markov-chain representation of the surface-ocean Lagrangian dynamics in a region occupied by the Gulf of Mexico (GoM) and adjacent portions of the Caribbean Sea and North Atlantic using satellite-tracked drifter trajectory data, the largest collection so far considered. From the analysis of the eigenvectors of the transition matrix associated with the chain, we identify almost-invariant attracting sets and their basins of attraction. With this information we decompose the GoM’s geography into weakly dynamically interacting provinces, which constrain the connectivity between distant locations within the GoM. Offshore oil exploration, oil spill contingency planning, and fish larval connectivity assessment are among the many activities that can benefit from the dynamical information carried in the geography constructed here.
It has become common practice to measure ocean current velocities together with the hydrography by lowering an ADCP on typical CTD casts. The velocities and densities thus observed are considered to consist mostly of a background contribution in geostrophic balance, plus internal waves and tides. A method to infer the geostrophic component by inverting the linearized potential vorticity (P V) provides plausible geostrophic density and velocity distributions. The method extracts the geostrophic balance closest to the measurements by minimizing the energy involved in the difference, supposed to consist of P V-free anomalies. The boundary conditions and the retention of P V by the geostrophic estimates follow directly from the optimization, which is based on simple linear dynamics and avoids both the use of the thermal wind equation on the measured density, and the classical problem of a reference velocity. By construction, the transport in geostrophic balance equals the measured one. Tides are the largest source of error in the calculation. The method is applied to six ADCP/CTD surveys made across the Yucatan Channel in the springs of 1997 and 1998 and in the winter of 1998-1999. Although the time interval between sections is sometimes close to one inertial period, large variations on the order of 10 percent are found from one section to the next. Transports range from 20 to 31 Sv with a net average close to 25 Sv, consisting of 33 Sv of in ow into the Gulf of Mexico and 8 Sv of out ow into the Caribbean Sea. The highest velocities are 2.0 m sec 2 1 into the Gulf of Mexico near the surface on the western side of the channel, decreasing to 0.1 m sec 2 1 by 400 to 500 m depth. Beneath the core of the Yucatan Current a countercurrent,with speeds close to 0.2 m sec 2 1 and an average transport of 2 Sv, hugs the slopes of the channel from 500 to 1500 m depth. Our data show an additional 6 Sv of return ow within the same depth range over the abrupt slope near Cuba, which is likely to be the recirculating fraction of the Yucatan Current deep extention, unable to out ow through the Florida Straits. The most signi cant southerly ows do not occur in the deepest portion of the channel, but at depths around 1000 m.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.