The title of this paper reveals an ambiguity of the issue analysed and ambivalent role of architecture at exhibitions: architecture here can be perceived as an object or topic tackled within exhibition (exhibition of architecture) as well as means to form the space of exposition (architecture of exhibition). The paper analyses different implications of architecture at exhibition and will try to demonstrate that terms of interdisciplinarity and collaboration can be introduced while talking about presentation of architecture and its context. Also, the transformations of relationship between an object displayed and the way it has been exhibited are discussed. In this paper the Lithuanian context of exhibitions is discussed through the scale of types of exhibitions, levels of displays and the collaboration that emerges from them. To examine the problematic nature of double-edged perception of architecture, three types of exhibitions are defined in the paper – documenting, researching and summarizing exhibition practices which differ in the methods and aims of their analysis and curatorial praxis used. Also, for the analysis of architecture of exhibitions (or a display) three levels have been characterized – 2D, 3D and 4D; apart from the technical part they are installed at exhibitions, they differ in the level the audience is involved and in the level the information can be interpreted. Santrauka Straipsnio pavadinimas atskleidžia pasirinktos temos dviprasmiškumą ir dvilypį architektūros vaidmenį: architektūra gali būti suvokiama ir kaip parodoje analizuojamas objektas ar problema (architektūros paroda), ir kaip parodą formuojantis elementas (parodos architektūra). Tekste siekiama atskleisti šio santykio dualumą, o kartu įrodyti, kad kai kalbama apie architektūros bei jos konteksto santykį – imamos vartoti tarpdiscipliniškumo ir kolaboracijos sąvokos, tuomet santykis tarp objekto ir jo eksponavimo būdo kinta, o riba tarp to, kas yra architektūra parodoje, ir kas yra parodos architektūra – išnyksta. Straipsnyje pristatant parodų tipus ir parodų architektūros lygmenis bei kolaboracines formas aptariamas Lietuvos parodinis kontekstas, analizuojamos šiandieninės situacijos sąlygos ir priežastys. Nagrinėjant parodų architektūros temą išskirti trys parodų tipai, tai dokumentuojančiosios, tiriančiosios ir apibendrinančiosios praktikos, kurios skiriasi analizės ir kuravimo būdais bei tikslais. Analizuojant parodų architektūros arba architektūros pristatymo būdus išskirti trys – 2d, 3d ir 4d – lygmenys, kurie, be instaliavimo būdo, skiriasi žiūrovo įtraukimo bei informacijos interpretavimo lygiu.
The article suggests the conception of national identity in interdisciplinary content to deduce parallels in architectural theory. Identity is analyzed from the perspectives of time (retrospective and perspective points of view) and personality (inner and outer) as well as from a local-global point of view. It is a part of extensive research on national identity discourses upon contemporary Lithuanian architecture. Though the problem of identity is a pressing issue, the forms of expressing it in architecture still remain facile. Therefore, the article explores the reasons of the current situation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.