No abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine whether augmented renal clearance (ARC) impacts negatively on ceftriaxone pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment in critically ill patients. Over a 9-month period, all critically ill patients treated with ceftriaxone were eligible. During the first 3 days of antimicrobial therapy, every patient underwent 24-h creatinine clearance (CLCR) measurements and therapeutic drug monitoring of unbound ceftriaxone. ARC was defined by a CLCR of ≥150 ml/min. Empirical underdosing was defined by a trough unbound ceftriaxone concentration under 2 mg/liter (percentage of the time that the concentration of the free fraction of drug remained greater than the MIC [fT>MIC], 100%). Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was performed to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens for various MICs and three groups of CLCR (<150, 150 to 200, and >200 ml/min). Twenty-one patients were included. The rate of empirical ceftriaxone underdosing was 62% (39/63). A CLCR of ≥150 ml/min was associated with empirical target underdosing with an odds ratio (OR) of 8.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5 to 30.7; P < 0.01). Ceftriaxone PK concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model. CLCR was associated with unbound ceftriaxone clearance (P = 0.02). In the MCS, the proportion of patients who would have failed to achieve a 100% fT>MIC was significantly higher in ARC patients for each dosage regimen (OR = 2.96; 95% CI = 2.74 to 3.19; P < 0.01). A dose of 2 g twice a day was best suited to achieve a 100% fT>MIC. When targeting a 100% fT>MIC for the less susceptible pathogens, patients with a CLCR of ≥150 ml/min remained at risk of empirical ceftriaxone underdosing. These data emphasize the need for therapeutic drug monitoring in ARC patients.

Background Antibiotic administration by subcutaneous (SC) injection is common practice in French geriatric wards as an alternative to the intravenous (IV) route, but few pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data are available. Ertapenem is useful for the treatment of infections with ESBL-producing enterobacteria. Objectives To report and compare ertapenem pharmacokinetic data between IV and SC routes in older persons. Methods Patients >65 years of age receiving ertapenem (1 g once daily) for at least 48 h (IV or SC, steady-state) were prospectively enrolled. Total ertapenem concentrations [residual (C0), IV peak (C0.5) and SC peak (C2.5)] were determined by UV HPLC. Individual-predicted AUC0–24 values were calculated and population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. Using the final model, a Monte Carlo simulation involving 10 000 patients evaluated the influence of SC or IV administration on the PTA. Tolerance to ertapenem and recovery were also monitored. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02505386. Results Ten (mean ± SD age=87±7 years) and 16 (age=88±5 years) patients were included in the IV and SC groups, respectively. The mean C0 and C2.5 values were not significantly different between the IV and SC groups (C0=12±5.9 versus 12±7.4 mg/L, P=0.97; C2.5=97±42 versus 67±41 mg/L, P=0.99). The mean C0.5 was higher in the IV group compared with the SC group (C0.5=184±90 versus 51±66 mg/L, P=0.001). The mean individual AUCs (1126.92±334.99 mg·h/L for IV versus 1005.3±266.0 mg·h/L for SC, P=0.38) and PTAs were not significantly different between groups. No severe antibiotic-related adverse effects were noted. Conclusions SC administration of ertapenem is an alternative to IV administration in older patients.

Background: According to infliximab (IFX) license in Crohn's disease (CD), infusion doses are based on patient's body-weight. Dose banding providing standardized doses (SD) has been implemented in parenteral chemotherapy in order to optimize aseptic unit capacity and reduce drug expenditure, duration of hospital stay and costs without decreasing efficacy. Material and method: The first part was a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive CD patients receiving IFX maintenance therapy to determine standardized doses covering more than 50% of infusions. The second part was a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of SD compared to body-weight doses (BWD) on admission duration and costs. Results: Six IFX SD covering more than 90% of infusion doses were implemented for dose banding. According to the Monte-Carlo simulation, there was no significant difference between IFX SD and BWD maintenance regimens. When assessed prospectively in 116 patients (75 patients treated with SD and 41 with BWD) corresponding to 128 infusions, hospitalization duration was shortened by 70 min per patient (p < 0.001). Conclusion:According to a pharmacokinetic model, IFX SD has a pharmacokinetic profile close to BWD and is associated with reduced length of hospitalization in a cohort of patients with CD. IFX SD implementation could optimize infusion units functioning and, save time and costs without decreasing efficacy.

The recombinant antibodies AK247, AK249, AK250, AK280 and AK281 detect by immunohistochemistry the glucagon-secreting alpha cells in mouse pancreatic islets.