BackgroundThe Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major depressive disorder (PERFORM) study describes the course of depressive symptoms, perceived cognitive symptoms, and functional impairment over 2 years in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and investigates the patient-related factors associated with functional impairment.MethodsThis was a 2-year observational study in 1,159 outpatients with MDD aged 18–65 years who were either initiating antidepressant monotherapy or undergoing their first switch of antidepressant. Functional impairment was assessed by the Sheehan Disability Scale and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Patients assessed depression severity using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire and severity of perceived cognitive symptoms using the five-item Perceived Deficit Questionnaire. To investigate which patient-related factors were associated with functional impairment, univariate analyses of variance were performed to identify relevant factors that were then included in multivariate analyses of covariance at baseline, month 2, months 6 and 12 combined, and months 18 and 24 combined.ResultsThe greatest improvement in depressive symptoms, perceived cognitive symptoms, and functional impairment was seen immediately (within 2 months) following initiation or switch of antidepressant therapy, followed by more gradual improvement and long-term stabilization. Improvement in perceived cognitive symptoms was less marked than improvement in depressive symptoms during the acute treatment phase. Functional impairment in patients with MDD was not only associated with severity of depressive symptoms but also independently associated with severity of perceived cognitive symptoms when adjusted for depression severity throughout the 2 years of follow-up.ConclusionThese findings highlight the burden of functional impairment in MDD and the importance of recognizing and managing cognitive symptoms in daily practice.

Summary Aims:  To investigate switching patterns of major antidepressant treatments and associated factors in a primary care adult population with major depressive disorder (MDD) using data from the General Practitioner Research Database (GPRD). Methods:  A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the GPRD. The study included patients with MDD, aged [18–70], with a new prescription for amitriptyline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline or venlafaxine between January 1, 2001 and September 30, 2003 and having no antidepressant prescription in the 6 months preceding index date. Switching of antidepressant treatment was defined as a prescription of a different antidepressant among all available marketed antidepressant treatment at this time (no restriction of compound) from 1 month before up to 2 months after the calculated end of the previous antidepressant treatment. Survival analysis techniques were used to describe switching of antidepressant and time to switch. Profiles of switchers were described and by‐treatment analyses performed. Results:  Data from over 59,000 patients showed that 16% switched antidepressants. Seventy‐two per cent of switches appeared within 3 months after treatment initiation. Within switchers, median time to switch was 53 days. Switching patients had generally a more severe psychiatric profile, including more previous episodes of depression or other psychiatric disorders. They also had a higher proportion of concurrent psychiatric disorders (especially anxiety) and concomitant prescription of anxiolytics or hypnotics. Patients initially prescribed amitriptyline were almost twice as likely to switch (27%) as patients prescribed venlafaxine (17%) or an SSRI (15%). Conclusions:  This population‐based study confirmed that antidepressant switch is more likely to occur within the first 3 months of treatment and in patients with a more severe psychiatric profile. A particular attention paid to these patients within the early phase of treatment may therefore help to improve their management.

No abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the impact of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease, on quality of life, to estimate the correlation between quality of life and severity of lung disease and to assess the impact of interstitial lung disease on caregivers. Methods: Seven investigators included systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease patients from December 2019 to April 2020. Sociodemographics and clinical data were collected. Patients reported outcomes and questionnaires were used with 1 generic patients reported outcome (EQ-5D-5L), 1 specific PRO (Brief Interstitial Lung Disease) and 2 self-reported questionnaires on impact of SSc complications and impact on caregivers. The correlation between forced vital capacity and EQ-5D-5L score was estimated with a multivariate linear regression model adjusted on several covariates. Results: In all, 89 patients were included. 26.4% were males, mean age was 58.2 ± 14.5 years. Mean EQ-5D-5L score = 0.79 ± 0.22 (median = 0.85). Mean EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale score = 60.8 ± 20.4 (median = 61.5). Mean King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score = 58.4 ± 12.7 (median = 58.0). After adjustment on covariates, a significant correlation between forced vital capacity and EQ-5D-5L score was found with an increase of 0.003 of the EQ-5D-5L score for a 1% increase of FVC (p = 0.0096). No significant correlation between forced vital capacity and the EQ-VAS and King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score were found. The impact of SSc on other organs was significantly correlated with EQ- 5D-5L score, respectively, for the impact scores on the lung system (p = 0.0003), heart system (p = 0.0182), Raynaud’s syndrome (p = 0.0015), digestive system (p = 0.0032), joints/muscles (p = 0.0003), skin (p < 0.0001), kidney (p = 0.0052) and gastro-oesophageal reflux (p = 0.0063). Significant correlations between King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score and lung system (p < 0.0001), heart system (p < 0.0001), digital ulcers (p = 0.058), digestive system (p < 0.0001), kidney (p = 0.0004), skin (p = 0.0499) and gastro-oesophageal reflux (p = 0.0033) scores were found 68.5% of patients reported their need for a caregiver to help them in their daily life activities. Conclusion: Our study highlighted the strong burden of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease` for patients, especially with an impact on quality of life, on other organs manifestations and need for caregivers in their daily life.

The significant rate of AD discontinuation and associated treatment duration indicate unmet needs among patients with GAD. As described in American studies, substantial health care costs were also observed in this study.