Background Qualitative research approaches are increasingly integrated into medical education research to answer relevant questions that quantitative methodologies cannot accommodate. However, researchers have found that traditional qualitative methodological approaches reflect the foundations and objectives of disciplines whose aims are recognizably different from the medical education domain of inquiry (Thorne, 2016, Interpretive description. New York, NY: Routledge). Interpretive description (ID), a widely used qualitative research method within nursing, offers an accessible and theoretically flexible approach to analysing qualitative data within medical education research. ID is an appropriate methodological alternative for medical education research, as it can address complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes. It allows for the advancement of knowledge surrounding educational experience without sacrificing methodological integrity that long‐established qualitative approaches provide. Purpose In this paper, we present interpretive description as a useful research methodology for qualitative approaches within medical education. We then provide a toolkit for medical education researchers interested in incorporating interpretive description into their study design. We propose a coherent set of strategies for identifying analytical frameworks, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigour and the limitations of ID for medical education research. We conclude by advocating for the interpretive description approach as a viable and flexible methodology for medical education research.

Faculty entrustment behaviors may be the primary drivers of resident entrustability. Faculty entrustment is a feature of faculty surgeons' teaching style and could be amenable to faculty development efforts.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Intraoperative resident autonomy has been compromised secondary to expectations for increased supervision without defined parameters for safe progressive independence, diffusion of training experience, and more to learn with less time. Surgical residents who are insufficiently entrusted during training attain less autonomy, confidence, and even clinical competency, potentially affecting future patient outcomes. Objective: To determine if OpTrust, an educational intervention for increasing intraoperative faculty entrustment and resident entrustability, negatively impacts patient outcomes after general surgery procedures. Methods: Surgical faculty and residents received OpTrust training and instruction to promote intraoperative faculty entrustment and resident entrustability. A post-intervention OpTrust cohort was compared to historical and pre-intervention OpTrust cohorts. Multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression was used to evaluate the impact of the OpTrust intervention and time on patient outcomes. Setting: Single tertiary academic center. Participants: General surgery faculty and residents. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Thirty-day postoperative outcomes, including mortality, any complication, reoperation, readmission, and length of stay. Results: A total of 8890 surgical procedures were included. After risk adjustment, overall patient outcomes were similar. Multivariable regression estimating the effect of the OpTrust intervention and time revealed similar patient outcomes with no increased risk (P > 0.05) of mortality {odds ratio (OR), 2.23 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-5.6]}, any complication [OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.76-1.3)], reoperation [OR, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-1.0)], readmission [OR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-1.2)], and length of stay [OR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.86-1.1)] compared to the historic and pre-intervention OpTrust cohorts. Conclusions: OpTrust, an educational intervention to increase faculty entrustment and resident entrustability, does not compromise postoperative patient outcomes. Integrating faculty and resident development to further enhance entrustment and entrustability through OpTrust may help facilitate increased resident autonomy within the safety net of surgical training without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of a novel faculty and resident educational bundle focused on development of facultyresident behaviors and entrustment in the operating room. Summary Background Data: As surgical training environments are orienting to entrustable professional activities (EPAs), successful transitions to this model will require significant faculty and resident development. Identifying an effective educational initiative which prepares faculty and residents for optimizing assessment, teaching, learning, and interacting in this model is critical. Methods: From September 2015 to June 2017, an experimental study was conducted in the Department of Surgery at the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS). Case observations took place across general, plastic, thoracic, and vascular surgical specialties. A total of 117 operating room observations were conducted during Phase I of the study and 108 operating room observations were conducted during Phase II following the educational intervention. Entrustment behaviors were rated for 56 faculty and 73 resident participants using OpTrust, a validated intraoperative entrustment instrument. Results: Multiple regression analysis showed a significant increase in faculty entrustment (Phase I ¼ 2.32 vs Phase II ¼ 2.56, P < 0.027) and resident entrustability (Phase I ¼ 2.16 vs Phase II ¼ 2.40, P < 0.029) scores following exposure to the educational intervention. Conclusions: Our study shows improved intraoperative entrustment following implementation of faculty and resident development, indicating the efficacy of this innovative educational bundle. This represents a crucial component in the implementation of a competency-based assessment framework like EPAs.