PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies that resulted in fetal demise or pregnancy termination. The results were also utilized to aid in the identification of candidate genes for fetal development and to expand the clinical phenotype of known genetic conditions.MethodsWES was performed on specimens from 84 deceased fetuses. Data were analyzed and final results were classified into one of four categories: positive, possible, negative, and candidate gene only. WES analysis was predominantly performed in fetus-parent trios or quads (61%, n=52).ResultsOverall, 20% (n = 17) of cases were positive, 45% (n=38) were possible, 9% (n=7) had only candidate gene variants and 26% (n = 22) tested negative. The diagnostic yield for definitive findings for trio analysis was 24% (n = 11) compared to 14% (n = 4) for singletons. The most frequently reported ultrasound anomalies were central nervous system (37%, n = 31), hydrops/edema (36%, n = 30), and cardiovascular anomalies (31%, n = 26).ConclusionOur experience supports the use of WES to identify the molecular etiology of fetal ultrasound anomalies, to identify candidate genes involved in fetal development, and to expand our knowledge of the clinical phenotype of known genetic conditions.

Original research article INTRODUCTIONSignificant advances in copy-number detection have broadened the mutation spectrum for many clinical genetic disorders. 1,2 Intragenic deletion mutations are of considerable frequency in many disease genes, such as PAX6, CDKL5, and STXPB1. Recurrent rearrangements between segmentally duplicated sequences are also associated with a number of syndromic disorders. 3 For these known disorders, targeted gene testing by multiplex ligation-dependent amplification or exon-focused arrays has been useful. With the increasing uptake of exome sequencing into the clinical diagnostic approach, the need for testing previously uncharacterized genes for pathogenic copynumber variation (CNV) is a significant consideration, not only to detect aberrations in genes that may cause disease when haplo-insufficient but also in genes associated with recessive disorders for which the mutation has been identified in only one of the alleles by exome sequencing. 4 Whereas exome sequencing is still gaining popularity as a powerful clinical tool, whole-genome chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has become an indispensable screening method that is now routinely used as a first-tier test for children with intellectual disability, developmental delay, or congenital anomalies. 5 In less than 10 years, the CMA designs have evolved from low-resolution arrays containing large bacterial artificial chromosome clones or <100,000 oligonucleotide probes to high-resolution versions with more than 1 million probes. 6 As a result, several groups have identified single-gene pathogenic aberrations that boost the analytical sensitivity of CMA. 7 However, although some of these more recent arrays have higher density at disease genes, they do not all cover every exon in those genes and are therefore not capable of detecting some pathogenic intragenic mutations. Separately, data from exon-focused arrays have shown that up to 40% of intragenic mutations can involve just one or two exons within a gene, and therefore it is essential to cover all exons within targeted genes. 1 Copy-number detection in clinical genetic testing eventually will occur entirely through examination of next-generation data, whereas array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and other assays will serve as complementary and confirmatory methods. 8 To complement whole-exome sequencing (WES) or whole-genome sequencing data in a meaningful way, an array with coverage of virtually all exons is essential. Until the time that WES/whole-genome sequencing can be used routinely and reliably for copy-number detection, a whole-exome array can be used as the ultimate whole-genome CMA platform. Purpose: Detection of copy-number variation (CNV) is important for investigating many genetic disorders. Testing a large clinical cohort by array comparative genomic hybridization provides a deep perspective on the spectrum of pathogenic CNV. In this context, we describe a bioinformatics approach to extract CNV information from whole-exome sequencing and demonstrate its ut...

IMPORTANCE Cerebral palsy is a common neurodevelopmental disorder affecting movement and posture that often co-occurs with other neurodevelopmental disorders. Individual cases of cerebral palsy are often attributed to birth asphyxia; however, recent studies indicate that asphyxia accounts for less than 10% of cerebral palsy cases.OBJECTIVE To determine the molecular diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (prevalence of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants) in individuals with cerebral palsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA retrospective cohort study of patients with cerebral palsy that included a clinical laboratory referral cohort with data accrued between 2012 and 2018 and a health care-based cohort with data accrued between 2007 and 2017.EXPOSURES Exome sequencing with copy number variant detection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was the molecular diagnostic yield of exome sequencing. RESULTS Among 1345 patients from the clinical laboratory referral cohort, the median age was 8.8 years (interquartile range, 4.4-14.7 years; range, 0.1-66 years) and 601 (45%) were female. Among 181 patients in the health care-based cohort, the median age was 41.9 years (interquartile range, 28.0-59.6 years; range, 4.8-89 years) and 96 (53%) were female. The molecular diagnostic yield of exome sequencing was 32.7% (95% CI, 30.2%-35.2%) in the clinical laboratory referral cohort and 10.5% (95% CI, 6.0%-15.0%) in the health care-based cohort. The molecular diagnostic yield ranged from 11.2% (95% CI, 6.4%-16.2%) for patients without intellectual disability, epilepsy, or autism spectrum disorder to 32.9% (95% CI, 25.7%-40.1%) for patients with all 3 comorbidities. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were identified in 229 genes (29.5% of 1526 patients); 86 genes were mutated in 2 or more patients (20.1% of 1526 patients) and 10 genes with mutations were independently identified in both cohorts (2.9% of 1526 patients).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among 2 cohorts of patients with cerebral palsy who underwent exome sequencing, the prevalence of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants was 32.7% in a cohort that predominantly consisted of pediatric patients and 10.5% in a cohort that predominantly consisted of adult patients. Further research is needed to understand the clinical implications of these findings.

Purpose: Exome sequencing (ES) is increasingly used for the diagnosis of rare genetic disease. However, some pathogenic sequence variants within the exome go undetected due to the technical difficulty of identifying them. Mobile element insertions (MEIs) are a known cause of genetic disease in humans but have been historically difficult to detect via ES and similar targeted sequencing methods. Methods: We developed and applied a novel MEI detection method prospectively to samples received for clinical ES beginning in November 2017. Positive MEI findings were confirmed by an orthogonal method and reported back to the ordering provider. In this study, we examined 89,874 samples from 38,871 cases. Results: Diagnostic MEIs were present in 0.03% (95% binomial test confidence interval: 0.02-0.06%) of all cases and account for 0.15% (95% binomial test confidence interval: 0.08-0.25%) of cases with a molecular diagnosis. One diagnostic MEI was a novel founder event. Most patients with pathogenic MEIs had prior genetic testing, three of whom had previous negative DNA sequencing analysis of the diagnostic gene. Conclusion: MEI detection from ES is a valuable diagnostic tool, reveals molecular findings that may be undetected by other sequencing assays, and increases diagnostic yield by 0.15%.

Purpose Data on the clinical prevalence and spectrum of uniparental disomy (UPD) remain limited. Trio exome sequencing (ES) presents a comprehensive method for detection of UPD alongside sequence and copy-number variant analysis. Methods We analyzed 32,067 ES trios referred for diagnostic testing to create a profile of UPD events and their disease associations. ES single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and copy-number data were used to identify both whole-chromosome and segmental UPD and to categorize whole-chromosome results as isodisomy, heterodisomy, or mixed. Results Ninety-nine whole-chromosome and 13 segmental UPD events were identified. Of these, 29 were associated with an imprinting disorder, and 16 were associated with a positive test result through homozygous sequence variants. Isodisomy was more commonly observed in large chromosomes along with a higher rate of homozygous pathogenic variants, while heterodisomy was more frequent in chromosomes associated with imprinting or trisomy mosaicism (14, 15, 16, 20, 22). Conclusion Whole-chromosome UPD was observed in 0.31% of cases, resulting in a diagnostic finding in 0.14%. Only three UPD-positive cases had a diagnostic finding unrelated to the UPD. Thirteen UPD events were identified in cases with prior normal SNP chromosomal microarray results, demonstrating the additional diagnostic value of UPD detection by trio ES.

use if that is the only option, is this malpractice? Arguably no. The standards in our understanding have changed. But it is impossible to know how things will change going forward, and therefore careful counseling of patients regarding our current understanding is critically important. In addition, and perhaps most importantly, providers need to keep up with what is happening in the field of genetics. It is complex and sometimes painful to do but with rapid changes in guidelines and technologies, and with the commercial laboratories offering a cool new test almost every week, it is critically important to be aware of what is out there and what ACOG is saying about it. It is not necessary to jump on the band wagon, but it is necessary to make a reasoned decision about not doing so and to be consistent in counseling patients about each "next best test. "-MEN)

No abstract