Objective
The propagation of electrophysiological activity measured by multichannel devices could have significant clinical implications. Gastric slow waves normally propagate along longitudinal paths that are evident in recordings of serosal potentials and transcutaneous magnetic fields. We employed a realistic model of gastric slow wave activity to simulate the transabdominal magnetogastrogram (MGG) recorded in a multichannel biomagnetometer and to determine characteristics of electrophysiological propagation from MGG measurements.
Methods
Using MGG simulations of slow wave sources in a realistic abdomen (both superficial and deep sources) and in a horizontally-layered volume conductor, we compared two analytic methods (Second Order Blind Identification, SOBI and Surface Current Density, SCD) that allow quantitative characterization of slow wave propagation. We also evaluated the performance of the methods with simulated experimental noise. The methods were also validated in an experimental animal model.
Results
Mean square errors in position estimates were within 2 cm of the correct position, and average propagation velocities within 2 mm/s of the actual velocities. SOBI propagation analysis outperformed the SCD method for dipoles in the superficial and horizontal layer models with and without additive noise. The SCD method gave better estimates for deep sources, but did not handle additive noise as well as SOBI.
Conclusion
SOBI-MGG and SCD-MGG were used to quantify slow wave propagation in a realistic abdomen model of gastric electrical activity.
Significance
These methods could be generalized to any propagating electrophysiological activity detected by multichannel sensor arrays.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.