Participants who received intradiskal PRP showed significant improvements in FRI, NRS Best Pain, and NASS patient satisfaction scores over 8 weeks compared with controls. Those who received PRP maintained significant improvements in FRI scores through at least 1 year of follow-up. Although these results are promising, further studies are needed to define the subset of participants most likely to respond to biologic intradiskal treatment and the ideal cellular characteristics of the intradiskal PRP injectate.

Intradiscal PRP is a safe and a possibly effective treatment for discogenic low back pain. Future studies are warranted to determine the best candidates for this treatment, what the optimal injectate is and what relationships exist between patient-reported outcomes and radiological findings.

Background:Gluteal tendinopathy is a prevalent condition that can be associated with significant pain and disability. To date, no studies have prospectively assessed the efficacy of intratendinous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections as a minimally invasive treatment for gluteus medius tendinopathy.Purpose:To prospectively assess the efficacy of intratendinous PRP injections as treatment for chronic recalcitrant gluteus medius tendinopathy.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:During the study period between July 2011 and November 2015, data were collected from the Hospital for Special Surgery Center for Hip Preservation Outcomes Registry on participants who underwent ultrasound-guided intratendinous PRP injections for recalcitrant gluteus medius tendinosis and/or partial tears of the tendon associated with moderate to severe lateral hip pain for longer than 3 months. All participants were assessed pre- and postinjection with 4 outcome measures: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific subscale (HOS-Sport), and the International Hip Outcome Tool–33 (iHOT-33). Demographic data, including age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, and smoking status, were also collected.Results:A total of 21 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 19.7 months (range, 12.1-32.3 months). The mean improvements from preinjection to postinjection follow-up were 56.73 to 74.17 for mHHS, 68.93 to 84.14 for HOS-ADL, 45.54 to 66.72 for HOS-Sport, and 34.06 to 66.33 for iHOT-33. All mean outcome measure improvements were clinically and statistically significant (P < .001). Length of follow-up was positively correlated with improvements in HOS-ADL (P = .021) and HOS-Sport (P = .004) scores. No adverse events were observed during or after the procedure.Conclusion:In this registry study with prospective follow-up, we found ultrasound-guided intratendinous PRP injections to be a safe and effective treatment option for chronic recalcitrant gluteus medius tendinopathy due to moderate to severe tendinosis and/or partial tendon tears. Well-powered randomized controlled studies are warranted to confirm our findings and further define the ideal candidates for this treatment.

Objective: The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of using tibial bone marrow delivered to the chondral-bone interface (CBI) via percutaneous chondral bone interface optimization (PeCaBoo) as a therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Study Design: A series of prospective cases were presented. Participants: Our study included 10 patients with medial or lateral compartment knee OA. Methods: With 1 cc of heparin pre-loaded in the syringe, 5 cc of tibial bone marrow was withdrawn from the proximal tibia. The resultant 6 cc of aspirate in the syringe was injected via PeCaBoo, 2 cc at a time, into the superior CBI and inferior CBI. The remaining 2 cc was injected via needle into the intra-articular joint space. Main Outcome Measurements: Patients had MRIs taken pre-procedure and 3 months post-procedure to measure bone edema and intra-articular matrix thickness. Patient-reported outcomes recorded included the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Numeric Paint Rating Scale (NRS), which were both obtained pre-procedure and post-procedure at 3, 6, and 12 months. Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) was recorded pre-and post-procedure as well. Results: Our study included 4 males and 6 females, with an average age of 63.5 years. The average follow-up time was 14 months, with a range of 13 -15 months. The mean WOMAC score was 58.2 points pre-procedure and 35.3 points post-procedure (p < 0.01). The mean NRS-Pain score was 8.6 points pre-procedure and 2.8 points post-procedure (p < 0.01). The matrix thickness increased by 14% on average at 3 months postprocedure (p < 0.01). The proportion of patients taking NSAIDs decreased by 60% after the PeCaBoo procedure. The subgroup of patients with tibial edema and knee OA had optimal outcomes. Conclusions: Tibial bone marrow stem cell delivered via PeCaBoo is a novel minimally-invasive treatment for knee OA, with potential to repair cartilage and improve knee pain and function. * Corresponding author. V. Vad et al.2

III.