Mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone) is a novel psychoactive substance popular among drug users because it displays similar effects to MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, ecstasy). Mephedrone consumption has been associated with undesirable effects and fatal intoxications. At present, there is no research available on its pharmacological effects in humans under controlled and experimental administration. This study aims to evaluate the clinical pharmacology of mephedrone and its relative abuse liability compared with MDMA. Twelve male volunteers participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover, and placebo-controlled trial. The single oral dose conditions were: mephedrone 200 mg, MDMA 100 mg, and placebo. Outcome variables included physiological, subjective, and psychomotor effects, and pharmacokinetic parameters. The protocol was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02232789). Mephedrone produced a significant increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and pupillary diameter. It elicited stimulant-like effects, euphoria, and well-being, and induced mild changes in perceptions with similar ratings to those observed after MDMA administration although effects peaked earlier and were shorter in duration. Maximal plasma concentration values for mephedrone and MDMA peaked at 1.25 h and 2.00 h, respectively. The elimination half-life for mephedrone was 2.15 h and 7.89 h for MDMA. In a similar manner to MDMA, mephedrone exhibits high abuse liability. Its earlier onset and shorter duration of effects, probably related to its short elimination half-life, could explain a more compulsive pattern of use as described by the users.
The use of dried blood spots (DBS) for anti-doping purposes would facilitate an increase in the number of blood samples because it eliminates the need for specialized personnel and involves minimal invasiveness, reduced costs, stability, and easy transportation and storage. Here, the electrophoretic methodology established by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) to detect erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been adapted to evaluate their applicability to DBS. A qualitative procedure to detect recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO), novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein (NESP), and continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) in a single DBS was optimized and validated. For rEPO and NESP, confirmation was performed in finger-prick DBS from a pilot study and an administration patients study, respectively. For CERA, detection capabilities were evaluated in DBS prepared with modeled-blood spiked with known concentrations of the protein. Main validation parameters concerning DBS sampling such as stability, hematocrit influence, and blood type (capillary vs. venous) described minor variations. Onsite drying appeared not to be essential before transport. Intra- and inter-day variation range was 2.9%-23.5%. Linearity was maintained (r ≥ 0.9) and ESAs were robustly recovered (CV ≤ 20.2%). The validated method permitted the detection of treated subjects after 48 hours and 17 days of rEPO and NESP administration, respectively. The reproduction of a CERA pharmacokinetics showed good possibilities for the method with a detection window that could reach 16 days after its actual administration. Thus, results provided here reinforce the suitability of DBS blood sampling for the analysis of ESA misuse in sports drug testing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.