No abstract

Introduction Hip arthroplasty is exposed to demographic change as patients age. Analysis of risk factors for surgical treatment decisions in the group of ≥ 80-year-old patients is crucial. Healthcare systems in developed countries are being tested medically and financially by the ageing population. Therefore, this study analysed the perioperative complications of cementless primary hip arthroplasty in octogenarians and compared them with patients aged ≤ 60 years. Methods A retrospective data analysis of the year 2017 was done in a maximum care hospital of General Orthopaedic Surgery. Patients aged ≥ 80 years or ≤ 60 years with primary cementless hip arthroplasty were included. The outcome of interest was surgery-related and systemic complications, the development of haemoglobin and the incidence of blood transfusion after cementless primary hip arthroplasty in octogenarians during the hospitalisation and the follow-up treatment. Chi-square tests and Fischer's exact test were used for nominal variables. The two-factorial variance analysis-mixed model was used for Hb analyses and the Welch test for group comparison for metric parameters. Results There was a significantly increased incidence of systemic complications during hospitalisation in the ≥ 80-year-old patients (phi 0.26; Std. Ri − 0.8 (A), 2.2 (B); p = 0.007), as well as a significantly increased rate of blood transfusions (phi 0.403; Std. Ri − 1.3 (A), 3.2 (B); p = < 0.001). No clustered pre-existing conditions in the ≥ 80-year-old patients pointed out a significant association with the incidence of systemic complications. Surgery-related complications showed no significant difference during hospitalisation and follow-up treatment. Conclusion The study reveals that primary cementless hip prosthesis implantation is a safe procedure without increased incidence of surgery-related complications. Increased attention should be paid to interdisciplinary preoperative optimisation (adjustment of blood pressure, blood transfusions, if necessary, safe exclusion of urinary tract infections) and postoperative care of octogenarians (tight laboratory examinations, geriatric co-attendance).

Introduction: Preoperative digital templating is a standard procedure that should help the operating surgeon to perform an accurate intraoperative procedure. To date, a detailed view considering gender differences in templating total knee arthroplasty (TKA), stage of arthrosis, and the surgeons’ experience altogether has not been conducted. Methods: A series of 521 patients who underwent bicondylar total knee arthroplasty was analyzed retrospectively for the planning adherence of digital templating in relation to sex, surgeon experience, and stage of arthrosis. Pre- and postoperative X-rays were comparably investigated for planned and implanted total knee arthroplasties. Digital templating was carried out through mediCAD version 6.5.06 (Hectec GmbH, 84032 Altdorf, Germany). For statistical analyses, IBM SPSS version 28 (IBM, 10504 Armonk, NY, US) was used. Results: The general planning adherence was 46.3% for the femur and 41.8% for the tibia. The Mann–Whitney U test revealed a gender difference for templating the femur (z = −5.486; p ≤ 0.001) and tibia (z = −3.139; p = 0.002). The surgeon’s experience did not show a significant difference through the Kruskal–Wallis test in the femur (K–W H = 4.123; p = 0.127) and the tibia (K–W H = 2.455; p = 0.293). The stage of arthrosis only revealed a significant difference in the planning of the femur (K–L-score (K–W H = 6.516; p = 0.038) alone. Discussion/Conclusion: Digital templating for total knee arthroplasty brought up gender differences, with oversized implants for women and undersized implants for men. A high stage of femoral arthrosis can lead to the under and oversized planning of the surgeon. Since the surgeon’s experience in planning did not show an effect on the adherence to templating, the beneficial effect of digital templating before surgery should be discussed.

No abstract