decreasing the levels of intracellular dNTPs 14,15 , which apparently compete with the 47 thymidine analog triphosphates for incorporation into HIV-1 cDNA during reverse 48 transcription 16 . We postulated that SAMHD1 could have a similar effect on nucleoside 49analog-based therapy in leukemia 6 . 50To investigate whether SAMHD1 expression enhances Ara-C cytotoxicity in AML 51 cells, we tested whether Ara-C sensitivity in 13 AML cell lines, determined by the half 52 maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ), is correlated with SAMHD1 protein and mRNA 53 levels. Both SAMHD1 expression (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1) and Ara-C sensitivity 54 (Supplementary Table 1) varied considerably among these cell lines. Unexpectedly, 55 SAMHD1 levels inversely correlated with Ara-C cytotoxicity (p=0.0037, Fig. 1b and 56 Supplementary Fig. 2a,b), as well as with the levels of early (Caspase 3 and 7 activity, 57 p=0.02, Supplementary Fig. 3a,b) and late (sub-G1 cells, apoptotic DNA fragmentation, 58 p=0.029, Supplementary Fig. 3c,d) markers of apoptosis. In contrast, no significant 59 correlation could be established between Ara-C IC 50 values and the expression of cellular 60 4 proteins previously implicated in Ara-C uptake or its conversion to Ara-CTP 1 , including 61 equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT1/SLC29A1), deoxycytidine kinase (DCK), cytidine 62 deaminase (CDA), deoxycytidilate deaminase (DCTD), or 5'-nucleotidase (NT5C2) (Fig. 63 1a,c-g). 64To further investigate its role in Ara-C resistance, we tested the effects of SAMHD1 65 deficiency by a number of approaches: (i) depletion of SAMHD1 in AML cell lines 66 expressing high endogenous SAMHD1 levels using either lentiviral vectors encoding 67 SAMHD1-specific shRNA or transfection with SAMHD1-specific siRNA; (ii) CRISPR/Cas9-68 mediated disruption of the SAMHD1 gene; and (iii) targeted degradation of SAMHD1 using 69 virus-like particles (VLPs) which shuttle the SAMHD1-interacting lentiviral Vpx protein 70 (Vpx-VLPs) into cells 7,8,17 (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 4). Vpx recruits SAMHD1 to a 71 cullin4A-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase (CRL4 DCAF1 ), which targets the enzyme for proteasomal 72 degradation 7,8 . 73SAMHD1 depletion in AML cell lines by RNA interference (OCI-AML3, THP-1), 74 SAMHD1 knockout (THP-1 -/-), or transduction with Vpx-VLPs (MonoMac6 cells, THP-1) 75 markedly sensitized AML cell lines to Ara-C toxicity relative to the respective controls (Fig. 76 2a,b and Supplementary Fig. 4). In contrast, SAMHD1 siRNA had only a marginal effect on 77 Ara-C toxicity in low SAMHD1-expressing HEL cells (Fig. 2a,b). Interestingly, we observed 78 SAMHD1 dependency, although less pronounced, for the purine analog fludarabine 79 ( Supplementary Fig. 5a); however, the IC 50 values for the topoisomerase II inhibitors 80 etoposide and daunorubicin, as well as for dFdC (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine; gemcitabine), 81were not consistently affected by SAMHD1 down-modulation ( Supplementary Fig. 5b-d), 82 indicating a certain degree of drug specificity. 83 5In HEL...
To obtain a deeper understanding of poor responses to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with lymphoma, we assessed blocking antibodies, total anti-spike IgG, and spike-specific memory B cells in the peripheral blood of 126 patients with lymphoma and 20 age-matched healthy controls 1 and 4 months after COVID-19 vaccination. Fifty-five percent of patients developed blocking antibodies postvaccination, compared with 100% of controls. When evaluating patients last treated from days to nearly 18 years prior to vaccination, time since last anti-CD20 was a significant independent predictor of vaccine response. None of 31 patients who had received anti-CD20 treatment within 6 months prior to vaccination developed blocking antibodies. In contrast, patients who initiated anti-CD20 treatment shortly after achieving a vaccine-induced antibody response tended to retain that response during treatment, suggesting a policy of immunizing prior to treatment whenever possible. Significance: In a large cohort of patients with B-cell lymphoma, time since anti-CD20 treatment was an independent predictor of neutralizing antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. Comparing patients who received anti-CD20 treatment before or after vaccination, we demonstrate that vaccinating first can generate an antibody response that endures through anti-CD20–containing treatment. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 85
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has necessitated the rapid development of prophylactic vaccines. Two mRNA vaccines have been approved for emergency use by the FDA and have demonstrated extraordinary effectiveness. The success of these mRNA vaccines establishes the speed of development and therapeutic potential of mRNA. These authorized vaccines encode full-length versions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. They are formulated with lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery vehicles that have inherent immunostimulatory properties. Different vaccination strategies and alternative mRNA delivery vehicles would be desirable to ensure flexibility of future generations of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the development of mRNA vaccines in general. Here, we report on the development of an alternative mRNA vaccine approach using a delivery vehicle called charge-altering releasable transporters (CARTs). Using these inherently nonimmunogenic vehicles, we can tailor the vaccine immunogenicity by inclusion of coformulated adjuvants such as oligodeoxynucleotides with CpG motifs (CpG-ODN). Mice vaccinated with the mRNA-CART vaccine developed therapeutically relevant levels of receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific neutralizing antibodies in both the circulation and in the lung bronchial fluids. In addition, vaccination elicited strong and long-lasting RBD-specific T H 1 T cell responses including CD4 + and CD8 + T cell memory.
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has necessitated the rapid development of prophylactic vaccines. Two mRNA vaccines have been approved for emergency use by the FDA and have demonstrated extraordinary effectiveness. The success of these mRNA vaccines establishes the speed of development and therapeutic potential of mRNA. These authorized vaccines encode full-length versions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. They are formulated with Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) delivery vehicles that have inherent immunostimulatory properties. Different vaccination strategies and alternative mRNA delivery vehicles would be desirable to ensure flexibility of future generations of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the development of mRNA vaccines in general. Here, we report on the development of an alternative mRNA vaccine approach using a novel delivery vehicle called Charge-Altering Releasable Transporters (CARTs). Using these inherently nonimmunogenic vehicles we are able to tailor the vaccine immunogenicity by inclusion of co-formulated adjuvants such as oligonucleotides with CpG motifs. Mice vaccinated with our mRNA-CART vaccine developed therapeutically relevant levels of RBD-specific neutralizing antibodies in both the circulation and in the lung bronchial fluids. In addition, our vaccine elicited strong and long lasting RBD-specific TH1 T cell responses including CD4+ and CD8+ T cell memory.
Antitumor T cell responses are the primary mediators of cancer immunotherapy. However, many other components of the immune system are needed for efficient T cell responses to be generated. Here, we developed a combinatorial approach where a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist (CpG) and Fc-fused IL-12 protein were injected together into just one of several tumor sites in a mouse. This combination led to body-wide (abscopal) therapeutic responses in multiple cancer models. These systemic responses were dependent not only on T cells but also on B cells. B cells were activated by the treatment and were required for optimal T cell activation. This cross-talk was dependent on MHC and was tumor antigen specific. The addition of an agonistic antibody against OX40 further enhanced T cell activation and therapeutic responses. Our data suggest that the combination of CpG, anti-OX40, and IL-12Fc may have success in patients with cancer and that B and T cell collaboration is crucial for the efficacy of this combination immunotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.