Classification of jets as originating from light-flavor or heavy-flavor quarks is an important task for inferring the nature of particles produced in high-energy collisions. The large and variable dimensionality of the data provided by the tracking detectors makes this task difficult. The current state-of-the-art tools require expert data-reduction to convert the data into a fixed low-dimensional form that can be effectively managed by shallow classifiers. We study the application of deep networks to this task, attempting classification at several levels of data, starting from a raw list of tracks. We find that the highest-level lowest-dimensionality expert information sacrifices information needed for classification, that the performance of current state-of-the-art taggers can be matched or slightly exceeded by deep-network-based taggers using only track and vertex information, that classification using only lowest-level highest-dimensionality tracking information remains a difficult task for deep networks, and that adding lower-level track and vertex information to the classifiers provides a significant boost in performance compared to the state-of-the-art.

No abstract

QCD-jets at the LHC are described by simple physics principles. We show how superresolution generative networks can learn the underlying structures and use them to improve the resolution of jet images. We test this approach on massless QCD-jets and on fat top-jets and find that the network reproduces their main features even without training on pure samples. In addition, we show how a slim network architecture can be constructed once we have control of the full network performance.

The classification of jets as quark-versus gluon-initiated is an important yet challenging task in the analysis of data from high-energy particle collisions and in the search for physics beyond the Standard Model. The recent integration of deep neural networks operating on low-level detector information has resulted in significant improvements in the classification power of quark/gluon jet tagging models. However, the improved power of such models trained on simulated samples has come at the cost of reduced interpretability, raising concerns about their reliability. We elucidate the physics behind quark/gluon jet classification decisions by comparing the performance of networks with and without constraints of infrared and collinear safety, and identify the nature of the unsafe information by revealing the energy and angular dependence of the learned models. This in turn allows us to approximate the performance of the low-level networks (by 99% or higher) using equivalent sets of interpretable high-level observables, which can be used to probe the fidelity of the simulated samples and define systematic uncertainties.

No abstract