During neuronal activation, a local decrease of deoxygenated hemoglobin concentration (deoxy‐Hb) occurs which is the basis of functional brain imaging with blood oxygenation level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD‐fMRI). Elevated intracranial pressure (eICP) has been shown to impair functional deoxy‐Hb changes. This study investigated this effect and its relation to the underlying neuronal activity in the human primary somatosensory cortex (SI). Functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) monitoring was performed on 75 subjects during conditions of median nerve stimulation (MNS) and resting state, combined with normal breathing (NB) and eICP by escalating breathing maneuvers (breath holding [BH], Valsalva maneuver with 15 mmHg [V15] and 35 mmHg expiratory pressure [V35]). During NB, fNIRS revealed a typical oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (oxy‐Hb) increase with deoxy‐Hb decrease during MNS enabling SI brain mapping. Breathing maneuvers associated eICP produced a known global change of oxy‐Hb and deoxy‐Hb with and without MNS. When subtracting measurements during resting state from measurements during MNS, neither functional oxy‐Hb nor deoxy‐Hb changes could be recovered while SEPs remained unchanged. In conclusion, Valsalva‐induced eICP prevents oxy‐Hb and deoxy‐Hb changes during neuronal activation in SI. This finding raises questions on the validity of oxy‐Hb‐ and deoxy‐Hb‐based brain imaging (e.g., BOLD‐fMRI) during eICP.
BackgroundCardioembolic stroke (CS) due to atrial fibrillation (AF) bears a high risk of unfavorable outcome. Treatment with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) reduces this risk. NOAC dosage occurs on a thin line during the acute phase of the stroke unit when the patient is threatened by both recurrent CS and a hemorrhagic stroke. It is often adapted to renal function—usually glomerular filtration rate (GFR)—to prevent both under- and overdosing. This study investigates the hypothetical risk of incorrect NOAC dosage after acute stroke when relying on plasma creatinine alone in comparison to a more exact renal function assessment including urine collection.MethodsIn a cohort study on consecutive 481 patients treated in a stroke unit with acute stroke and AF, the GFR estimated from plasma creatinine (eGFR) was compared to concurrent creatinine clearance measurement (CrCl) from urine collection regarding the hypothetically derived NOAC dosage.ResultsThe risk of incorrect dosage (mean, 95% confidence interval) was 6.9% (4.8–9.5), 26% (23–31), 38% (33–42), and 20% (16–23) for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, respectively. The overall risk for incorrect dosage of any NOAC was 23% (21–25). Thresholds for age and admission eGFR were optimized to achieve an overall risk below 5% by additional CrCl measurements in selected patients (apixaban <36 ml/min and any age, dabigatran <75 ml/min and >70 y, edoxaban >36 ml/min and >58 y, rivaroxaban <76 ml/min and >75 y, any NOAC <81 ml/min and >54 y). The resulting portion of patients requiring an additional CrCl measurement was 10, 60, 80, 55, and 65% for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and any NOAC, respectively.ConclusionsThere is a considerable risk of incorrect NOAC dosage in patients with acute CS treated in a stroke unit that can be lowered by targeted CrCl measurements in selected patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.