Pharmacy-based CVD screening is acceptable to the public. Its uptake could be improved through increased awareness of the service and by addressing concerns about privacy and confidentiality in promotional activities.
Background and objective: The 'audit cycle' is a fundamental part of improving clinical performance. For this to be effective, improvements made must be sustained. We observed that the prescription of Oxygen is often poor. Our aim was to audit Oxygen prescription before and after an educational intervention, and then again 4 years on. We hypothesized that improvements made immediately after the intervention would not be sustained over a longer period of time. Conclusions: The rate of Oxygen prescription improves significantly after an educational intervention; however, this improvement is not sustained. This observation is likely reflected in a range of areas where the audit cycle is used to improve performance. It is important to be aware of this potential for regression to ensure that improvements are maintained over time.
Aims: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health subspecialist training in Paediatric Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics has been delivered in the UK for 20 years, but no specialist clinical services have been set up previously. Methods: Prospective audit and service evaluation of paediatric clinical pharmacology service pilot phase and dedicated service at a UK children's hospital. Results: Pilot scheme (May-October 2019), then weekly service (established June 2020). Service covers the High Dependency Unit, and inpatients with polypharmacy.The pilot demonstrated high levels of acceptance, with 89% of suggested medication changes agreed by lead clinical team, and success, with 97.5% of suggested changes continued until discharge/pilot completion. Economic analysis estimated direct annualised cost savings on medications of up to £10 000. After 20 ward rounds of the established service, 270 potential medication changes were identified, 213 were carried out (78.9%). The most common were deprescribing (n = 143), prescribing (n = 47) and dose adjustment (n = 8). Seventy-five different medications were deprescribed, most commonly chloral hydrate (n = 12), Lactulose, ibuprofen, Bio-Kult and sodium alginate (all n = 4). The percentage of inpatients prescribed ≥10 medications decreased from 38.5 to 32.1%, while the subset prescribed ≥20 medications decreased from 11.0 to 5.67%. The mean number of medicines prescribed decreased from 9.0 to 8.0, while the median was unchanged at 7. Annual Yellow Card reports of suspected adverse drug reactions more than doubled (n = 66).
Conclusion:A UK model for subspecialist paediatric clinical pharmacology service delivery has demonstrated a positive clinical impact and could be replicated at other UK secondary/tertiary children's hospitals.
Background Management of chronic renal failure requires complex medication regimens to manage hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, phosphate, anaemia and acidosis. Patient engagement in medicine management is essential to avoid potential harm. Methods We prospectively audited the rate of discrepancies between our hospital record of patient medications and their current prescription. We investigated whether changes to appointment letters reduced the number of discrepancies. Results The proportion of patients attending renal outpatient clinics failing to bring a list or unable to recall their medications fell over a 3-year period following changes to appointment letters (median proportion: 0.45 in 2014, 0.36 in 2015, 0.30 in 2016, Chi-sq = 46.94, p < 0.001); percentage of patients forgetting to bring a list with significant prescription discrepancies fell from 10.9% in 2014 to 3.9% in 2016). Conclusion Changes to appointment letters can potentially improve prescribing safety in an outpatient setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.