No abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used as effective pharmacological agents to treat depressive disorders. In contrast to the SSRIs, which block the presynaptic serotonin (5-HT) transporter and by this route increase the concentration of serotonin in the synaptic cleft, the antidepressant tianeptine enhances the presynaptic neuronal reuptake of 5-HT and thus decreases serotonergic neurotransmission. Both SSRIs and tianeptine are clinically effective; however, their opposite modes of action challenge the prevailing concepts on the need of enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission. To better understand the differences between these two opposite pharmacological modes of action, we compared the changes induced by tianeptine and paroxetine on psychopathology, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system, and cognitive functions in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial including 44 depressed inpatients over a period of 42 days. Depressive symptomatology significantly improved in all efficacy measures, with no significant differences between tianeptine and paroxetine. There was a trend toward better response to the SSRI among women. Assessment of the HPA system showed marked hyperactivity before the beginning of treatment, which then normalized in most of the patients, without significant differences between the two antidepressants. Cognitive assessments showed no significant differences between the two drugs investigated. The results of the current study suggest that the initial effect, i.e., enhancement or decrease of 5-HT release, is only indirectly responsible for antidepressant efficacy, and they support the notion that downstream adaptations within and between nerve cells are crucial. The normalization of the HPA system as a common mode of action of different antidepressants seems to be of special interest.

Tianeptine enhances while paroxetine inhibits serotonin reuptake into neurons; however, both show an antidepressive action. A subgroup of 38 depressed patients from a drug trial comparing the efficacy of tianeptine with that of paroxetine was studied with regard to their effects on sleep regulation, especially in relation to treatment response. We recorded sleep EEGs at day 7 and day 42 after the start of treatment with either compound, which allows measurement of changes due to the antidepressive medication in relation to the duration of treatment. Spectral analysis of the non-REM sleep EEG revealed a strong decline in the higher sigma frequency range (14-16 Hz) in male treatment responders independent of medication, whereas nonresponders did not show marked changes in this frequency range independent of gender. The patients receiving paroxetine showed less REM sleep and more intermittent wakefulness compared to the patients receiving tianeptine. REM density after 1 week of treatment was a predictor of treatment response in the whole sample. Psychopathological features with regard to the score in single items of the HAMD revealed predictive markers for response, some of which were opposite in the gender groups, especially those related to somatic anxiety. Changes in REM density were inversely correlated to the changes in HAMD in the paroxetine, but not the tianeptine, group. Our data suggest the importance of taking gender into account in the study of the biological effects of drugs. The study further points to the importance of the higher sigma frequency range in the sleep EEG of non-REM sleep and REM density as a marker of treatment response.