T cell immunity is central for the control of viral infections. CoVac-1 is a peptide-based vaccine candidate, composed of SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes derived from various viral proteins1,2, combined with the Toll-like receptor 1/2 agonist XS15 emulsified in Montanide ISA51 VG, aiming to induce profound SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity to combat COVID-19. Here we conducted a phase I open-label trial, recruiting 36 participants aged 18–80 years, who received a single subcutaneous CoVac-1 vaccination. The primary end point was safety analysed until day 56. Immunogenicity in terms of CoVac-1-induced T cell response was analysed as the main secondary end point until day 28 and in the follow-up until month 3. No serious adverse events and no grade 4 adverse events were observed. Expected local granuloma formation was observed in all study participants, whereas systemic reactogenicity was absent or mild. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses targeting multiple vaccine peptides were induced in all study participants, mediated by multifunctional T helper 1 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. CoVac-1-induced IFNγ T cell responses persisted in the follow-up analyses and surpassed those detected after SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as after vaccination with approved vaccines. Furthermore, vaccine-induced T cell responses were unaffected by current SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Together, CoVac-1 showed a favourable safety profile and induced broad, potent and variant of concern-independent T cell responses, supporting the presently ongoing evaluation in a phase II trial for patients with B cell or antibody deficiency.

No abstract

Seasonal influenza vaccination is established as important infection prevention measure, especially among highly exposed healthcare workers (HCWs) [1]. Coadministration with the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine could be an efficient strategy protecting HCWs from two major viral respiratory infections [2][3][4]. To date, the humoral immunogenicity and side-effects of a coadministered third COVID-19 and a seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine are still unclear, and the available data is limited in transferability to the general public [5][6][7]. This preference-based non-randomised controlled study examines the antibody-mediated immunogenicity and vaccine-related side-effects of mRNA-based COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccine coadministration in HCWs.1231 participants of the CoVacSer study with two doses of BNT162b2mRNA (30 µg mRNA each) as basic COVID-19 immunisation received a third dose of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine administering BNT162b2mRNA (30 µg mRNA) or mRNA-1273 (50 µg mRNA) depending on age and vaccine availability. HCWs could opt for a simultaneous influenza vaccine coadministration (Influvac Tetra vaccine 2021/2022) injected intramuscularly into the opposite arm. HCWs without coadministration received either no seasonal influenza vaccination or at least 14 days apart from the COVID-19 booster. Convalescent HCWs having passed a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded.Pseudonymised serum blood samples combined with a questionnaire were collected from 1 October 2021 to 31 January 2022 between 14 and 90 days after the COVID-19 vaccination. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike IgG levels were obtained using the SERION ELISA agile SARS-CoV-2 IgG (SERION diagnostics, Wuerzburg, Germany) [8].The statistical analyses were performed with R (version 3.1.2) on logarithmised anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike IgG concentrations based on a multiple linear regression analysis. The parameters including potential influencing factors were estimated using a generalised least squares fit (R package nlme) [9,10]. Statistical subgroup differences of the independent categorical variables were calculated with the estimated marginal means. Using the Tukey test statistics, pairwise post hoc tests were performed to expose statistically significant differences. The emmeans package was used to estimate marginal means and to calculate pairwise differences [11]. Investigating the role of side-effects, pairwise Fisher exact tests were performed. To correct against multiple testing, p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Yekutielie procedure [12]. Only adjusted p-values below a significance level of 0.05 were considered statistically significant.The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Wuerzburg in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (file number 79/21). 20.2% (249/1231) of all participants opted for coadministration, whereas 90.4% (225/249) received BNT162b2mRNA and 9.6% (24/249) mRNA-1273 as COVID-19 booster vaccine. 79.8% (982/1231) of all participants were vaccinated with a mRNA-based COVID-19 vacci...

Despite significant progress made in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, for patients with early relapse or rapidly progressing high-risk disease, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) might be an option leading to long-term survival. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 90 MM patients who received allogeneic SCT in our center between 1999 and 2017. We specifically assessed the association of impaired humoral immune reconstitution, referred to as immunoparesis, and post-transplant survival. Sixty-four patients received allogeneic SCT in relapse following 2-7 lines of therapy; 26 patients received upfront tandem autologous-allogeneic SCT. With a median follow-up of 76 months, OS and PFS were 52.6% (95% CI 42.9-64.3) and 36.4% (95% CI 27.6-47.9) at 2 years and 38.6% (95% CI 29.2-51.1) and 25.3% (95% CI 17.5-36.4) at 5 years, respectively. Receiving more than two therapy lines prior to transplantation was an independent risk factor for OS (HR 3.68, 95% CI 2.02-6.70) and PFS (HR 3.69, 95% CI 2.09-6.50). In a landmark analysis at day 200, prolonged immunoparesis was associated with reduced OS (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.14-9.11). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation offers an additional treatment element that may lead to long-term remission in selected patients with poor prognosis, probably exploiting graft-versus-myeloma effects. Immunoparesis could potentially serve as an indicator for impaired survival following allogeneic transplantation, an observation to be further studied prospectively.

Against the background of the current COVID‐19 infection dynamics with its rapid spread of SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern (VOC), the immunity and the vaccine prevention of healthcare workers (HCWs) against SARS‐CoV‐2 continues to be of high importance. This observational cross‐section study assesses factors influencing the level of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐spike IgG after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or vaccination. One thousand seven hundred and fifty HCWs were recruited meeting the following inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, PCR‐confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection convalescence and/or at least one dose of COVID‐19 vaccination. anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐spike IgG titers were determined by SERION ELISA agile SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG. Mean anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐spike IgG levels increased significantly by number of COVID‐19 vaccinations (92.2 BAU/ml for single, 140.9 BAU/ml for twice and 1144.3 BAU/ml for threefold vaccination). Hybrid COVID‐19 immunized respondents (after infection and vaccination) had significantly higher antibody titers compared with convalescent only HCWs. Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐spike IgG titers declined significantly with time after the second vaccination. Smoking and high age were associated with lower titers. Both recovered and vaccinated HCWs presented a predominantly good humoral immune response. Smoking and higher age limited the humoral SARS‐CoV‐2 immunity, adding to the risk of severe infections within this already health impaired collective.

Structural variants (SV) are changes in the genomic landscape that can alter gene expression levels and thus lead to disease development. The most common and best studied SVs in hematological malignancies are chromosomal translocations. Here, parts of two genes that are normally on different chromosomes come into close proximity due to a failure in DNA repair. As a consequence, fusion proteins which show a different function and/or cellular localization compared to the two original proteins are expressed, sometimes even at different levels. The identification of chromosomal translocations is often used to identify the specific disease a patient is suffering from. In addition, SVs such as deletions, duplications, inversions and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can occur in hematopoietic cells and lead to their malignant transformations. Changes in the 3D genome structure have also recently been shown to impact disease development. In this review, we describe a variety of SVs occurring in different subtypes of hematological malignancies. Currently, most therapeutic approaches target fusion proteins which are the cellular product of chromosomal translocations. However, amplifications and SNPs also play a role in disease progression and can be targeted. We present some examples for different types of structural variants and how they are currently treated.

While highly efficient in hematological malignancies, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs), alike the closely related CAR T cells, are as of yet not successful in solid tumors. Moreover, all presently available T cell-mobilizing strategies cause substantial side effects that endanger patients and limit applicable doses and thus efficacy. Here we report on the development of CC-1, a PSMAxCD3 bsAb that is constructed in a novel IgG-based format (IgGsc) and contains a proprietary PSMA binder with extended reactivity. CC-1 displays a prolonged serum half-life, especially when compared to the BiTE bsAb format. Extensive in vitro and in vivo characterization demonstrated the potency of CC-1 to induce T cell activity in a highly target cell-restricted manner, resulting in profound antitumor activity, which among others allowed for elimination of large established tumors in humanized mice (Zekri et al, EMBO 2020). Exclusively funded by public resources, we conducted GMP production of CC-1 and in November 2019 initiated a first in human trial enrolling castration resistant prostate carcinoma patients (NCT04104607). The trial consists of two parts: a dose escalation phase with intra-individual dose escalation until the target dose of 826µg to determine overall safety, tolerability as well as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and a dose expansion phase, where patients are treated on the MTD level to detect possible efficacy. In August 2021, recruitment in the dose escalation phase was completed and the target dose was reached without DLT upon treatment of the 9th patient. A total of 14 patients were treated, with the most frequently observed toxicity being cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in 79% of patients. CRS did not exceed grade 2 according to the Lee et al. grading system (Lee et al., 2014) and resolved in most cases without additional application of tocilizumab. Besides hypertension (observed in 50% of patients), no further CC-1 related toxicities (i.e., Xerostomia, or anaphylactic reaction) were observed. As expected, after prophylactic tocilizumab application decreased neutrophile counts and elevated liver enzymes were observed in 86% and 43% of patients, respectively. In terms of efficacy, a rapid and profound decline of elevated PSA levels was observed in all the heavily pre-treated patients, with up to 60% reduction compared to baseline. Three patients of the dose escalation phase received multiple treatment cycles at the highest dose level, based on clinical tolerability, documented induction of potent T cell activation as well as rapid and profound decline of elevated PSA levels. Taken together, CC-1 is a promising compound with a favorable toxicity profile and promising clinical activity. Recruitment in the dose expansion phase is ongoing with the respective data to be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Jonas S. Heitmann, Juliane S. Walz, Martin Pflügler, Maddalena Marconato, Christian M. Tegeler, Julia Reusch, Jannik Labrenz, Richard Schlenk, Gundram Jung, Helmut Salih. CC-1, a bispecific PSMAxCD3 antibody for treatment of prostate carcinoma: Results of the ongoing phase I dose escalation trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT141.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an increasingly recognised pathogen, affecting several hundred thousand individuals in western countries each year. Importantly, the majority of immunocompromised individuals are not able to clear HEV but develop a chronic course of infection. In the case of lymphoma, which is an inherent immunosuppressive disease per se, chemotherapy can even further exacerbate the immunosuppressive status. As the mechanism of HEV chronification is barely understood, it is important to gain knowledge about the influence of chemotherapeutic drugs on the HEV replication cycle to guide rational clinical management of HEV infection in such patients. In this case report, a 70 year old man was diagnosed with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. As we observed the occurrence of chronic HEV after treatment with the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib in vivo, we investigated the influence of BTK signaling and ibrutinib treatment in the HEV replication cycle in vitro. First, we detected an HEV-induced mobilisation of BTK in human liver cells during HEV replication. A moderate antiviral effect against HEV replicating isolates including genotypes 1 and 3 was observed, suggesting that ibrutinib did not support HEV replication in a direct manner. Combinatory treatments of ibrutinib with ribavirin indicated that ibrutinib did not influence the antiviral effect of ribavirin. Taken together, chemotherapy targeting cellular factors for the treatment of lymphomas may be a neglected risk factor for the chronification of HEV. For ibrutinib, despite the upregulation of its target BTK during HEV replication, we observed neither a proviral effect on HEV replication nor an influence on the antiviral effect of ribavirin, suggesting that the chronification of HEV may be favoured by its immunosuppressive effect.