PERK 1,2 . By contrast, the effects of CDDO on CHOP were not blunted by any individual EIF2α kinase deficiency (Extended Data Fig. 1g) , possibly owing to the limited specificity of related compounds 11 . The comparative interrogation of CHOP regulators following three distinct cellular insults allowed us to differentiate global regulators of CHOP biology (Extended Data Fig. 1h-m) from such selectively operating in the context of CCCP-induced mitochondrial depolarization (Extended Data Figs. 2-4). In particular, stringent filtering for genes that prominently scored with CCCP, but not TM or CDDO, highlighted the transcriptional regulators TAF4 and GABPB1, glycolysis factors SLC2A1 and TPI1, and RNA binding proteins RBM27 and CLUH (KIAA0664). Moreover, the signature contained the mitochondrial proteins ATP5IF1 (ATPIF1) and OMA1. Most strikingly, it revealed a strong requirement for HRI (EIF2AK1) and the scarcely studied protein DELE1 (KIAA0141) (Fig. 1a, Extended Data Fig. 5a-b). Cellular dynamics of DELE1Given the scant knowledge on DELE1 and the unexpected involvement of HRI, we first sought to validate their requirement in a panel of cell systems including non-transformed cells, and indeed could confirm their importance in all cases (Extended Data Fig. 5c). Furthermore, CHOP induction also depended on DELE1 and HRI for other types of mitochondrial stress, including inhibition of complex V (oligomycin), TRAP1 (GTPP), and genetic ablation of LONP1 (Extended Data Fig. 5d-f). Failure to induce CHOP after stimulation with CCCP was preceded by a defect in EIF2α phosphorylation in HRI-or DELE1-deficient cells, suggesting that like HRI, DELE1 operates upstream of this event (Extended Data Fig. 5g). Strikingly, expression of HRI in DELE1 knockout cells was able to partially restore CHOP induction, whereas DELE1 expression in HRI-deficient cells was unproductive (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 6a-b). This indicated that DELE1 requires HRI to trigger CHOP but not vice versa, suggesting that DELE1 may act upstream of both EIF2α and HRI. Given that DELE1 is a mitochondrial protein 12 (Extended Data Fig. 6c), whereas HRI resides in the cytoplasm, we next wondered whether the activity of DELE1 towards HRI might be regulated by its localization. To test this hypothesis, we investigated if artificially rerouting DELE1 to the cytosol would bypass the need for a mitochondrial insult to provoke CHOP expression. Indeed, expression of a DELE1 mutant lacking the mitochondrial targeting sequence (DELE1 ∆MTS ) yielded a predominantly cytoplasmic protein that readily induced CHOP expression independently of CCCP (Fig. 2b-c, Extended Data Fig. 6d-e). This constitutively active version of DELE1 still required HRI to induce CHOP, underscoring its likely role as an activator of HRI. Based on these findings, we asked whether the activity of wild-type DELE1 might be regulated via a similar mechanism. Indeed, while DELE1 localized to mitochondria in unperturbed cells, it could be detected in the cytosol upon CCCP treatment (Fig. 2d). We did not ob...
Mammalian preimplantation development involves two lineage specifications: first, the CDX2-expressing trophectoderm (TE) and a pluripotent inner cell mass (ICM) are separated during blastocyst formation. Second, the pluripotent epiblast (EPI; expressing NANOG) and the differentiated primitive endoderm (PrE; expressing GATA6) diverge within the ICM. Studies in mice revealed that OCT4/POU5F1 is at the center of a pluripotency regulatory network. To study the role of OCT4 in bovine preimplantation development, we generated knockout (KO) fibroblasts by CRISPR-Cas9 and produced embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). SCNT embryos from nontransfected fibroblasts and embryos produced by in vitro fertilization served as controls. In KO morulae (day 5), ∼70% of the nuclei were OCT4 positive, indicating that maternal mRNA partially maintains OCT4 protein expression during early development. In contrast, KO blastocysts (day 7) lacked OCT4 protein entirely. CDX2 was detected only in TE cells; OCT4 is thus not required to suppress CDX2 in the ICM. Control blastocysts showed a typical salt-and-pepper distribution of NANOG- and GATA6-positive cells in the ICM. In contrast, NANOG was absent or very faint in the ICM of KO blastocysts, and no cells expressing exclusively NANOG were observed. This mimics findings in OCT4-deficient human blastocysts but is in sharp contrast to-null mouse blastocysts, where NANOG persists and PrE development fails. Our study supports bovine embryogenesis as a model for early human development and exemplifies a general strategy for studying the roles of specific genes in embryos of domestic species.
The ability to edit the genome is essential for many state-of-the-art experimental paradigms. Since DNA breaks stimulate repair, they can be exploited to target site-specific integration. The clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/cas9 system from Streptococcus pyogenes has been harnessed into an efficient and programmable nuclease for eukaryotic cells. We thus combined DNA cleavage by cas9, the generation of homologous recombination donors by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and transient depletion of the non-homologous end joining factor lig4. Using cultured Drosophila melanogaster S2-cells and the phosphoglycerate kinase gene as a model, we reached targeted integration frequencies of up to 50% in drug-selected cell populations. Homology arms as short as 29 nt appended to the PCR primer resulted in detectable integration, slightly longer extensions are beneficial. We confirmed established rules for S. pyogenes cas9 sgRNA design and demonstrate that the complementarity region allows length variation and 5′-extensions. This enables generation of U6-promoter fusion templates by overlap-extension PCR with a standardized protocol. We present a series of PCR template vectors for C-terminal protein tagging and clonal Drosophila S2 cell lines with stable expression of a myc-tagged cas9 protein. The system can be used for epitope tagging or reporter gene knock-ins in an experimental setup that can in principle be fully automated.
BackgroundLipids are stored within cells in lipid droplets (LDs). They consist of a core of neutral lipids surrounded by a monolayer of phospholipids, predominantly phosphatidylcholine (PC). LDs are very dynamic and can rapidly change in size upon lipid uptake or release. These dynamics require a fast adaptation of LD surface. We have recently shown that two Lands cycle PC synthesizing enyzmes, LPCAT1 and LPCAT2 can localize to the LD surface.ResultsHere, we show that knock-down of both enzymes leads to an increase in LD size without changes in the total amount of neutral lipids, while interference with the de-novo Kennedy pathway PC biosynthesis is associated with changes in triacylglyceride synthesis. We show that function of LPCAT1 and 2 is conserved in Drosophila melanogaster by the ortholog CG32699. Furthermore we demonstrate that modulation of the LD pool by LPCAT1 influences the release of lipoprotein from liver cells.ConclusionActivity of the Kennedy pathway regulates the balance between phospholipids and neutral lipids, while the Lands cycle regulates lipid droplet size by regulating surface availability and influencing surface to volume ratio. Differences in lipid droplet size may account for differences in lipid dynamics and be relevant to understand lipid overload diseases.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12860-014-0043-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.