BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a heritable chronic health condition characterized by pain symptoms throughout the life course that are routinely treated with opioids. OBJECTIVE: This study examined differences in substance use disorders in Black American adults with SCD compared to those with other chronic conditions or with no chronic conditions. DESIGN: Data from a population-representative sample of Black Americans with SCD, other chronic conditions, and no chronic conditions were obtained from the National Survey of American Life (NSAL) database. Diagnosis of substance use disorder was determined by structured clinical interview. Hierarchical models controlling for covariates (demographics, socioeconomic status, self-rated health, and mood disorders) compared odds of diagnosis between the three groups. PARTICIPANTS: The sample included 4238 African-American and Black Caribbean participants from the NSAL study who were 18 years of age or older. MAIN MEASURES: Measures included age, sex, income, education, marital status, employment, possession of health insurance, health conditions, and substance use disorders diagnosed by structured clinical interview. KEY RESULTS: Controlling for age, sex, and socioeconomic status, there were no differences in odds of a drug use disorder when comparing individuals with SCD to Black adults with other chronic conditions (OR = 1.12; p = 0.804) or no chronic condition (OR = 2.09; p = 0.102). SCD was, however, associated with greater odds of alcohol use disorders when compared to the groups with other chronic conditions (OR = 2.15; p = 0.01) and no chronic conditions (OR = 5.11; p < 0.001). This effect was not better accounted for by socioeconomic status, marital status, self-rated physical health, or the presence of a mood disorder. CONCLUSIONS: SCD was not a risk factor for drug use disorders. Further data will be needed to understand the factors contributing to increased risk of alcohol use disorders in SCD and the role uncontrolled pain symptoms may have in driving substance use.
Little is known about the relationships among self-efficacy, social determinants of health, and health outcomes in adults living with sickle cell disease (SCD). We conducted mediation analyses examining the relationships among health literacy, perceived stigma, self-efficacy, and health outcomes in an online cohort of adults living with SCD. The health outcomes explored were physical and mental health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and pain interference; covariates included gender, disease severity, and depressive symptoms. Data came from a cross-sectional, descriptive study of 60 adults with SCD. Perceived stigma and self-efficacy had significant relationships with the study outcomes, while health literacy did not. Self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between perceived stigma and physical HRQOL, when controlling for depressive symptoms. Future research should investigate the influence of stigma and self-efficacy on health outcomes in patients with SCD and consider stigma when creating interventions to modify self-efficacy.
Aims and objectives The purpose of this study was to report the psychometric properties, including validity and reliability, of the decision fatigue scale (DFS). Background Decision fatigue may impair nurses’ ability to make sound clinical decisions and negatively impact patient care. Given the negative impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on psychological well‐being and the workplace environment, decision fatigue may be even more apparent among clinical nurses. Valid assessment of this condition among clinical nurses may inform supportive interventions to mitigate the negative sequelae associated with states of decision fatigue. Design This study was a secondary analysis of a parent study using a cross‐sectional descriptive design. Methods A convenience sample of 160 staff nurses was recruited online from across the United States. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and subjective measures of decision fatigue, nursing practice environment scale and traumatic stress. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), correlation coefficients and internal consistency reliability coefficients were computed to examine the DFS’s validity and reliability within this sample. Results The EFA yielded a single factor, 9‐item version of the DFS. The DFS scores were strongly correlated with traumatic stress and moderately correlated with the nursing practice environment, and the scale displayed appropriate internal consistency. Conclusions This is the first known study to provide evidence of the DFS’s validity and reliability in a sample of registered nurses working during the COVID‐19 pandemic. The results of this study provide evidence of a reliable and valid assessment instrument for decision fatigue that can be used to measure the burden of decision‐making among registered nurses. Relevance to clinical practice Given the relationship between traumatic stress and the nursing work environment, decision fatigue may be a modifiable target for interventions that can enhance the quality of decision‐making among clinical nurses.
Health-related stigma, a form of devaluation related to a health condition, is common in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Pain is the hallmark symptom of SCD, and health-related stigma is often described during care-seeking for pain management. Few published instruments measure health-related stigma in individuals with SCD. This study builds on the psychometrics of the 30- and 40-item Sickle Cell Disease Health-Related Stigma Scale (SCD-HRSS). In a sample of 197 adults with SCD, the results support the reliability and validity of a 21-item scale, the SCD-HRSS-Short Form, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.91 and discriminant validity with the PROMIS-29 subscales (anxiety, depressive symptoms, pain interference, physical fatigue, sleep, and role satisfaction). A shorter yet reliable and valid scale may decrease the burden for this underrepresented, minoritized population while still providing important information regarding their experiences of stigmatization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.