No abstract

Agreement on the assessment of metastatic spine instability is moderate. The SINS can help improve communication among clinicians in oncology care.

Whole-head magnetoencephalographic recordings were obtained from 10 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and 10 healthy controls in a resting position. Spectroscopic examinations were performed by means of a 1.5-tesla whole-body scanner in the temporoparietal regions of both hemispheres. The relationship between ¹H-MRS-based and magnetoencephalography (MEG)-based measures and their conjoined capability to improve the diagnosis of AD were investigated in this study. Logistic regression analyses were performed. Three separated logistic models were calculated for ¹H-MRS-based metabolites, low-frequency magnetic activity, and the combination of both measures. A combined myoinositol/N-acetyl aspartate (mI/NAA)-delta dipole density (DD) model predicted the diagnosis with 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Additionally, the combination of temporoparietal mI/NAA and delta DD values explained the variability of individuals’ cognitive status. The results support the notion that a multidisciplinary approach may improve the understanding and diagnosis of AD.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Several neuroimaging studies have shown reliable differences between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and age-matched controls. However, few studies have demonstrated the interactions between neuroimaging methods for the diagnoses of AD. Objective: In this study, we try to elucidate the complementary nature of magnetoencephalography (MEG) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) examinations in the assessmentof AD. Methods: Ten patients fulfilling the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria of probable AD, and 10 elderly individuals with no history of neurological or psychiatric illness serving as age-matched controls participated in the study. All patients and controls received an MRS, MEG and neuropsychological assessment. MEG data were obtained in the context of a working memory task, previously utilized in a similar sample of patients. Results: The AD group showed a reduced number of activity sources over left temporoparietal areas during the late portion of the evoked magnetic field (between 400–800 ms), as well as a bilateral temporoparietal increase in creatine and myoinositol concentrations, and in the myoinositol/N-acetyl-aspartate ratio. The combination of the variables ‘number of dipoles during the late portion of the evoked magnetic field’ and ‘myoinositol/N-acetyl-aspartate ratio’ accounted for 65% of the variance of the Mini Mental State Examination scores. Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of assessing the complex brain pathology underlying AD by utilizing multiple brain examination modalities in a coordinate approach.

No abstract

Materials and methods: Clinical data and imaging from 90 patients with biopsy-proven spinal metastases, were provided to 83 specialists from 44 hospitals. Spinal levels involved and the Tomita and modified Bauer scores for each case were determined twice by each clinician, with a minimum of 6-week interval. Clinicians were blinded to every evaluation. Kappa statistic was used to assess intra and inter-observer agreement. Subgroup analyses were performed according to clinicians' specialty (medical oncology, neurosurgery, radiology, orthopedic surgery and radiation oncology), years of experience (67, 8-13, P14), and type of hospital (four levels).Results: For metastases identification, intra-observer agreement was ''substantial'' (0.60 < k < 0.80) at sacrum, and ''almost perfect'' (k > 0.80) at the other levels. Inter-observer agreement was ''almost perfect'' at lumbar spine, and ''substantial'' at the other levels. Intra-observer agreement for the Tomita and Bauer scores was almost perfect. Inter-observer agreement was almost perfect for the Tomita score and substantial for the Bauer one. Results were similar across specialties, years of experience and type of hospital. Conclusion: Agreement in the assessment of metastatic spine disease is high. These scoring systems can improve communication among clinicians involved in oncology care.