The chicken is a well-established model for amniote (including human) skeletal muscle formation because the developmental anatomy of chicken skeletal muscle matches that of mammals. The accessibility of the chicken in the egg as well as the sequencing of its genome and novel molecular techniques have raised the profile of this model. Over the years, a number of regulatory and marker genes have been identified that are suited to monitor the progress of skeletal myogenesis both in wildtype and in experimental embryos. However, in the various studies, differing markers at different stages of development have been used. Moreover, contradictory results on the hierarchy of regulatory factors are now emerging, and clearly, factors need to be able to cooperate. Thus, a reference paper describing in detail and side-by-side the time course of marker gene expression during avian myogenesis is needed. We comparatively analysed onset and expression patterns of the key markers for the chicken immature paraxial mesoderm, for muscle-competent cells, for cells committed to myogenesis and for cells entering terminal differentiation. We performed this analysis from stages when the first paraxial mesoderm is being laid down to the stage when mesoderm formation comes to a conclusion. Our data show that, although the sequence of marker gene expression is the same at the various stages of development, the timing of the expression onset is quite different. Moreover, marker gene expression in myogenic cells being deployed from the dorsomedial and ventrolateral lips of the dermomyotome is different from those being deployed from the rostrocaudal lips, suggesting different molecular programs. Furthermore, expression of Myosin Heavy Chain genes is overlapping but different along the length of a myotube. Finally, Mef2c is the most likely partner of Mrf proteins, and, in contrast to the mouse and more alike frog and zebrafish fish, chicken Mrf4 is co-expressed with MyoG as cells enter terminal differentiation.

Pax7 expressing muscle stem cells accompany all skeletal muscles in the body and in healthy individuals, efficiently repair muscle after injury. Currently, the in vitro manipulation and culture of these cells is still in its infancy, yet muscle stem cells may be the most promising route toward the therapy of muscle diseases such as muscular dystrophies. It is often overlooked that muscular dystrophies affect head and body skeletal muscle differently. Moreover, these muscles develop differently. Specifically, head muscle and its stem cells develop from the non-somitic head mesoderm which also has cardiac competence. To which extent head muscle stem cells retain properties of the early head mesoderm and might even be able to switch between a skeletal muscle and cardiac fate is not known. This is due to the fact that the timing and mechanisms underlying head muscle stem cell development are still obscure. Consequently, it is not clear at which time point one should compare the properties of head mesodermal cells and head muscle stem cells. To shed light on this, we traced the emergence of head muscle stem cells in the key vertebrate models for myogenesis, chicken, mouse, frog and zebrafish, using Pax7 as key marker. Our study reveals a common theme of head muscle stem cell development that is quite different from the trunk. Unlike trunk muscle stem cells, head muscle stem cells do not have a previous history of Pax7 expression, instead Pax7 expression emerges de-novo. The cells develop late, and well after the head mesoderm has committed to myogenesis. We propose that this unique mechanism of muscle stem cell development is a legacy of the evolutionary history of the chordate head mesoderm.

Huntington's disease (HD) is a disorder characterized by chronic involuntary movements, dementia, and psychiatric symptoms. It is caused by a mutation in the gene that encodes for huntingtin protein (HTT), leading to the formation of mutant proteins expressed in various tissues. Although brain pathology has become the hallmark for HD, recent studies suggest that damage of peripheral structures also contributes to HD progression. We previously identified severe alterations in the motor units that innervate cervical muscles in 12-month-old BACHD (Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Huntington's Disease) mice, a well-established mouse model for HD. Here, we studied lumbar motoneurons and their projections onto hind limb fast-twitch skeletal muscles (tibialis anterior), which control balance and gait in HD patients. We found that lumbar motoneurons were altered in the HD mouse model; the number and size of lumbar motoneurons were reduced in BACHD. Structural alterations were also present in the sciatic nerve and neuromuscular junctions. Acetylcholine receptors were organized in several small patches (acetylcholine receptor fragmentation), many of which were partially innervated. In BACHD mice, we observed atrophy of tibialis anterior muscles, decreased expression of glycolytic fast Type IIB fibers, and at the ultrastructural level, alterations of sarcomeres and mitochondria. Corroborating all these findings, BACHD animals performed worse on motor behavior tests. Our results provide additional evidences that nerve-muscle communication is impaired in HD and that motoneurons from distinct spinal cord locations are similarly affected in the disease.