BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

This article develops mobility mapping as a valuable space-related instrument to tackle the lack of attention to the meanings of places and everyday spatial mobility in the process of refugee settlement. Referring to two consecutive case studies carried out with asylum seekers and recognized refugees in rural Germany, we discuss the surplus of this tool considering both peculiarities in implementation and the opportunities of analysis of respondent-generated maps. Experiences from this trial research point out ways of implementing a tool that focuses on the graphic and visual dimension of knowledge creation. Relying on principles of participatory research, this tool can help to diminish power asymmetries between the researcher and the participant and acknowledge individuals’ competencies in terms of language. Depending on the aim of the study, the empirical data generated can be analysed both as a product and as a process. Results indicate added value by revealing the importance of spatial dimensions in asylum seekers’ and refugees’ life-worlds, encompassing the construction of individually important places as well as spatial mobility and accessibility. For practitioners, the implementation of the tool provides an opportunity to enhance participant-oriented planning and capacity building, such as in terms of networks and infrastructures, that addresses both individuals’ needs and spatial structures.

1. Current modelling approaches to predict spatially explicit biodiversity responses to climate change mainly focus on the direct effects of climate on species. Integration of spatiotemporal land-cover scenarios is still limited. Current approaches either regard land cover as constant boundary conditions, or rely on general, typically globally defined land-use scenarios. This is problematic as it disregards the complex synergistic effects of climate and land use on biodiversity at the regional scale, as biophysical, economic, and social issues important for regional land-use decisions are also affected by climate change. To realistically predict climate impacts on biodiversity, it is therefore necessary to consider both, the direct effect of climate change on biodiversity, and its indirect effect on biodiversity via land-use change. 2. In this review and perspective paper, we outline how biodiversity models could be better integrated with regional, climate-driven land-use models. We provide an overview of empirical and modelling approaches to both land-use (LU) and biodiversity (BD) change, focusing on how integration has been attempted. We then analyse how LU and BD model properties, such as scales, inputs, and outputs, can be matched and identify potential integration challenges and opportunities. 3. We found LU integration in BD models has been frequently attempted. By contrast, integrating the role of BD in models of LU decisions is largely lacking. As a result, bi-directional effects remain largely understudied. Only few integrated LU-BD socio-ecological models have assessed climate change effects on LU and no study has yet investigated the relative contribution of direct vs. indirect effects of climate change on BD. 4. There is a large potential for model integration given the overlap on spatial scales, although challenges remain with respect to spatial scale, temporal dynamics, investigation of indirect effects, and bi-directionality, including feeding back to climate models. Efforts to better understand human decisions, eco-evolutionary dynamics, connection between terrestrial and aquatic systems, and format standardization of modelling outputs and empirical data should improve future models. Integrating biodiversity feedbacks into land-use and climate models requires modelling innovations, but should be feasible.

No abstract

No abstract