Background: In hip arthroscopic surgery, capsulotomy is performed to improve visualization and allow instrumentation of the joint. Traditionally, the defect has been left unrepaired; however, increasing evidence suggests that this may contribute to persistent pain and iatrogenic capsular instability. Nevertheless, the clinical benefit of performing routine capsular repair remains controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of routine capsular closure on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), hypothesizing that superior PROs would be observed with routine capsular closure. Study Design: Meta-analysis and systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The terms “hip,”“arthroscopy,”“capsule,”“capsular,”“repair,” and “closure” were used to query Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), SPORTDiscus, and PubMed. Articles with PROs stratified by capsular management were included. Multivariate mixed-effects metaregression models were implemented with study-level random-effects and fixed-effects moderators for capsular closure versus no repair and after controlling for surgical indication and preoperative PROs. The effect of repair on both the postoperative score and the change in scores was evaluated via the Harris Hip Score (HHS)/modified HHS (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and HOS–Sport Specific Subscale (SSS), with a supplemental analysis of additional outcomes. Results: Of 432 initial articles, 36 were eligible for analysis, with results for 5132 hip arthroscopic procedures. The capsule was repaired in 3427 arthroscopic procedures and unrepaired in 1705. Capsular repair was associated with significantly higher postoperative HHS/mHHS (2.011; SE, 0.743 [95% CI, 0.554-3.467]; P = .007), HOS-ADL (3.635; SE, 0.873 [95% CI, 1.923-5.346]; P < .001), and HOS-SSS (4.137; SE, 1.205 [95% CI, 1.775-6.499]; P < .001) scores as well as significantly superior improvement on the HHS/mHHS (2.571; SE, 0.878 [95% CI, 0.849-4.292]; P = .003), HOS-ADL (3.315; SE, 1.131 [95% CI, 1.099-5.531]; P = .003), and HOS-SSS (3.605; SE, 1.689 [95% CI, 0.295-6.915]; P = .033). Conclusion: This meta-analysis is the largest to date evaluating the effect of capsular closure on PROs and demonstrates significantly higher mean postoperative scores and significantly superior improvement with repair, while controlling for the effects of preoperative score and surgical indication. The true magnitude of the benefit of capsular repair may be clarified by large prospective randomized studies using PRO measures specifically targeted and validated for hip arthroscopic surgery/preservation.

The significance of graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with soft tissue grafts is well established, with a minimum graft diameter of 8.0 mm associated with lower rates of revision surgery. Consistently achieving grafts that meet or exceed the ideal diameter of 8.0 mm is still a concern with traditional tibial screw fixation, even with quadrupled hamstring autografts. The authors hypothesized that following a simple intraoperative algorithm selectively incorporating the gracilis tendon in an 8-stranded construct for all-inside ACLR with suspensory fixation on both ends of the graft would consistently achieve graft diameters of 8.0 mm or larger by allowing more of the graft material to contribute to increased diameter instead of increased length for screw fixation, with no allograft tissue required. A total of 113 eligible cases were identified, including 70 male patients and 43 female patients (mean±SD age, 25.92±6.47 years; range, 14–49 years). All 113 grafts (100%) were at least 8.0 mm in diameter. There were 8 grafts that were 8.0 mm. Overall mean±SD graft diameter was 9.32±0.71 mm (median, 9.5 mm; range, 8.0–11.0 mm). There were no cases in which allograft tissue was needed to increase graft size. An analysis of 113 cases of all-inside hamstring autograft ACLR with dual suspensory fixation showed that a graft diameter of at least 8.0 mm was achieved in every case, without the use of allograft tissue. These results suggest that this technique for ACLR is reliable in producing grafts that meet or exceed the recommended minimum diameter of 8.0 mm. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(4):e539–e545.]