The determination of reliable geotechnical parameters from laboratory testing is highly dependent on sample quality. Over the past decades, undisturbed sampling of soft sensitive clays has been performed using various apparatuses and procedures. This paper outlines details of the design and performance of a new Laval-type tube sampler employed for the investigation of five soft clay sites located in Finland. The investigation was conducted using the new tube sampler and two different piston samplers. The sample quality was evaluated based on the recompression volume during reconsolidation to the in situ effective stress in constant-rate-of-strain oedometer tests. Test results show that tube samples are generally characterized by higher quality, especially in low-plasticity clays. In particular, the quality of piston samples is highly affected by the apparatus condition and sampling operations. Furthermore, the influence of storage time on tube samples was investigated. To guarantee a proper confinement, and thus reduce swelling, a pressurized system was applied to the tube samples obtained in two soft clay sites. Results demonstrate that the sample quality is not significantly affected by storage time as long as the soil is properly stored in the tube.
A well-established analytical model based on spherical cavity expansion and critical state soil mechanics theories is applied to piezocone soundings for profiling the yield stress and overconsolidation ratio of five soft sensitive test sites located in Finland. Yield stress is related to three piezocone parameters: net cone resistance, excess porewater pressure, and effective cone resistances. Input geoparameters include the effective stress friction angle, defined at both peak strength and at maximum obliquity, and the model directly provides the operational value of the undrained rigidity index. The piezocone-evaluated profiles compare favorably with results from laboratory constant-rate-of-strain consolidation tests for all the investigated sites. Based on the obtained experimental results, simplified correlations valid for Finnish soil conditions are derived. Their validity is assessed based on the bias factor, coefficient of variation, and coefficient of determination, showing a fairly good agreement between the predicted and the target values.
The authors would like to thank the discusser (Koutsoftas 2020) for the critical re-evaluation of the results presented by Di Buò et al. ( 2019) and for the observations on sample quality criteria. In particular, the discusser indicated three items requiring clarification. The authors are glad to provide additional explanations and information.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.