SummaryDue to restrictions on personnel availability, the service capacity at a health facility may vary day to day based on an established schedule. This temporal variability influences a user's choice set, modifying their possible choices. As a result, the spatial accessibility of public health care may be constantly reshaped rather than being a relatively static experience as commonly represented in place‐based spatial accessibility literature. Building on the latest advances in the two‐step floating catchment method, this study presents further advancements through the inclusion of health facility schedules to better represent health care availability in the assessment of accessibility. The results show that the proposed method reveals communities with relatively poor accessibility that are hidden with many existing methods. By exposing the available care within time windows, a more accurate picture of the services available to be accessed is revealed. The findings suggest that improvement in the number of doctor hours at health facilities may reduce the disparities found in accessibility scores for communities. Further, in public health care systems similarly structured, the spatial configuration of facilities with doctors can be considered at the administrative level to ensure adequate levels of access across the jurisdiction.
There has been limited information on spatial accessibility to healthcare in Multi-island Micro States (MIMS). This is partly due to the application of methodologies that do not sufficiently consider the dynamic or unique characteristics of MIMS. The objective of the paper is to evaluate the performance of different GIS methodologies for quantifying spatial accessibility to public healthcare in Multi-Island States (MIMS). Spatial Accessibility was measured using three GIS-based methodologies; Temporally Available Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (TA2SFCA), and traditional models (Two Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) and the Gravity Model). Unlike the Gravity model and the 2SFCA which only used population and health facilities locations along with travel times to quantify spatial accessibility, the TA2SFCA also included information on the hours of operations and health schedules in its assessment. These additional variables were used to develop the time windows to assess differences in capacity among available service sites. TA2SFCA results showed that spatial accessibility was linked to a “traveling doctor” dynamic with access to healthcare services reflecting changes in supply of services. As such, the Gravity Model and Two Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) which did not account for this peculiarity were inadequate for measuring spatial accessibility in MIMS. The TA2SFCA addressed both the temporal and spatial aspects of health which was most reflective of the health system of these islands. Given the spatial-temporal dynamic, improving accessibility to healthcare requires periodic assessments and reassessments of health service delivery since this is affected by operating times and changes in capacity. Furthermore, there is the need for more research to develop methodologies that are more reflective or sensitive to MIMS dynamics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.