Standing waves can cause errors during in-the-ear calibration of sound pressure level (SPL), affecting both stimulus magnitude and distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level. Sound intensity level (SIL) and forward pressure level (FPL) are two measurements theoretically unaffected by standing waves. SPL, SIL and FPL in-situ calibrations were compared by determining sensitivity of DPOAE level to probe-insertion depth (deep, “shallow”) for a range of stimulus frequencies (1−8 kHz) and levels (20−60 dB). Probe-insertion depth was manipulated with the intent to shift the frequencies with standing-wave minima at the emission probe, introducing variability during SPL calibration. The absolute difference in DPOAE level between insertions was evaluated after correcting for an incidental change caused by the effect of ear-canal impedance on the emission traveling from the cochlea. A three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) found significant main effects for stimulus level, stimulus frequency and calibration method, as well as significant interactions involving calibration method. All calibration methods exhibited changes in DPOAE level due to insertion depth, especially above 4 kHz. However, SPL demonstrated the greatest changes across all stimulus levels for frequencies above 2 kHz, suggesting that SIL and FPL provide more consistent measurements of DPOAEs for frequencies susceptible to standing-wave calibration errors.

No abstract

Objective The primary goal of nonlinear frequency compression (NFC) and other frequency lowering strategies is to increase the audibility of high-frequency sounds that are not otherwise audible with conventional hearing-aid processing due to the degree of hearing loss, limited hearing aid bandwidth or a combination of both factors. The aim of the current study was to compare estimates of speech audibility processed by NFC to improvements in speech recognition for a group of children and adults with high-frequency hearing loss. Design Monosyllabic word recognition was measured in noise for twenty-four adults and twelve children with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Stimuli were amplified based on each listener’s audiogram with conventional processing (CP) with amplitude compression or with NFC and presented under headphones using a software-based hearing aid simulator. A modification of the speech intelligibility index (SII) was used to estimate audibility of information in frequency-lowered bands. The mean improvement in SII was compared to the mean improvement in speech recognition. Results All but two listeners experienced improvements in speech recognition with NFC compared to CP, consistent with the small increase in audibility that was estimated using the modification of the SII. Children and adults had similar improvements in speech recognition with NFC. Conclusion Word recognition with NFC was higher than CP for children and adults with mild to severe hearing loss. The average improvement in speech recognition with NFC (7%) was consistent with the modified SII, which indicated that listeners experienced an increase in audibility with NFC compared to CP. Further studies are necessary to determine if changes in audibility with NFC are related to speech recognition with NFC for listeners with greater degrees of hearing loss, with a greater variety of compression settings, and using auditory training.

Objective To further examine the reliability of categorical loudness scaling (CLS) for individual loudness categories and for the slope of the CLS functions. In addition, the relationship between CLS and audiometric threshold will be evaluated. Design CLS functions were obtained on 74 subjects, 58 with hearing loss and 16 with normal hearing. CLS functions were measured at three frequencies (1, 2, and 4 kHz) in two separate sessions separated by as little as 1 week and as much as 6 months. Reliability of mean and median levels within each loudness category was assessed using standard deviations and correlation coefficients. Lines were fit to the CLS functions and slopes of the lines were used to assess reliability and the relation between CLS and audiometric threshold. Results Similar reliability for CLS measurements was observed in both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects at all frequencies. Across both groups of subjects, correlations describing the reliability of mean stimulus-level within category exceeded 0.92 at all frequencies. In addition, standard deviations of the mean stimulus-level difference between visits ranged from 6.6 to 7.8 dB, depending on frequency. The correlation between the slope of a straight line fitted to the entire CLS function and audiometric threshold collapsed across frequencies was 0.72. A segmented line was then fit to the CLS function: one segment was fit to the soft portion of the CLS function (categorical units, CU, ≤20) and the other segment to the loud portion (CU>20). Slopes of the line fit to the entire CLS function and of the line fit to the soft portion of the CLS function were both reliable across sessions. The slope of the line fit to the soft portion increased as audiometric threshold increased, with the correlations greater than 0.86 at all frequencies. No relationship was observed between slope of the line fit to the loud portion of the CLS function and audiometric threshold. Iso-loudness contours were constructed from the CLS data and used to determine the gain that would be needed to produce “normal” loudness percepts for hearing-impaired individuals. Conclusions Within-subject CLS measurements were reliable across sessions both for individual loudness categories and for slope of the CLS functions. In addition, the slope of the low-level portion of the CLS function varied in a predictable manner with audiometric threshold, with slope increasing as audiometric threshold increased. Finally, gain as a function of input level needed to provide loudness percepts for individuals with hearing loss equal to the loudness percepts of normal-hearing individuals can be estimated from audiometric threshold. This finding supports the assumption that both audiometric threshold and response growth (loudness) are determined by the same underlying cochlear mechanisms.

Simultaneous measurement of auditory brain stem response (ABR) and otoacoustic emission (OAE) delays may provide insights into effects of level, frequency, and stimulus rise-time on cochlear delay. Tone-burst-evoked ABRs and OAEs (TBOAEs) were measured simultaneously in normal-hearing human subjects. Stimuli included a wide range of frequencies (0.5-8 kHz), levels (20-90 dB SPL), and tone-burst rise times. ABR latencies have orderly dependence on these three parameters, similar to previously reported data by Gorga et al. [J. Speech Hear. Res. 31, 87-97 (1988)]. Level dependence of ABR and TBOAE latencies was similar across a wide range of stimulus conditions. At mid-frequencies, frequency dependence of ABR and TBOAE latencies were similar. The dependence of ABR latency on both rise time and level was significant; however, the interaction was not significant, suggesting independent effects. Comparison between ABR and TBOAE latencies reveals that the ratio of TBOAE latency to ABR forward latency (the level-dependent component of ABR total latency) is close to one below 1.5 kHz, but greater than two above 1.5 kHz. Despite the fact that the current experiment was designed to test compatibility with models of reverse-wave propagation, existing models do not completely explain the current data.