This study is aimed a t understanding how people edit their own arguments prior to uttering them (Hample, 1984; Hample & Dallinger, 19854 1985b). 7he main categories of editorial criteria are effectiueness, principled objection to type of argument, person-centered issues, and discourse competence standards. Our main purpose here is to begn an account of what sort of person prefers which criteria. Argumentativeness (InfantelkRancer, 1982), verbalaggression (Infante & Wigley, I W), interpersonalorientation (Swap&Rubin, I W), and respondent gender are associated with use of editorial criteria. Results point to hO0 different approaches to editing one's own arguments. The task orientation focuses on effectiveness, and is taken by males, and by people high in verbalaggressiveness and low in interpersonal orientation. The relational orientation is taken by females, and by people low in verbal aggressiueness and high in argument avoidance and interpersonal orientation. Justification for using multiple arguments to instantiate each type of argument, and for using multiple situations was also found. UBLIC arguments originate in people's minds. Much of our scholarship on argumentation is focused on public texts. P Thus we identify warrants, or pair parts, or suppressed premises and write analyses of them. Certainly we can learn a lot about arguments in this way, but text-based research inherently subordinates the private origins to the public artifacts of argumentation. In fact, our impression is that the whole of textual scholarship about argument has very little to say about how people think of arguments. The line of research represented by this article is intended, if not as a corrective, at Dale Hample (Ph.D., University of Illinois, 1975) is a professor and Judith M. Dallinger
Taking conflict personally (TCP) is conceptualized as a negative emotional personalization of conflict episodes. Here, individuals' TCP levels were examined in relationship to both their own conflict management styles and their perceptions of supervisors' conflict management styles. Results indicate that one's TCP levels are associated with one's own preferred conflict management style, with supervisor's perceived conflict style, and with satisfaction with supervisor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.