We look inside neurons in vivo and identify major cytoskeletal rearrangements that allow a dendrite to become a regenerating axon.

Summary Background In many differentiated cells microtubules are organized into polarized noncentrosomal arrays, yet few mechanisms that control these arrays have been identified. For example, mechanisms that maintain microtubule polarity in the face of constant remodeling by dynamic instability are not known. Drosophila neurons contain uniform polarity minus-end-out microtubules in dendrites, which are often highly branched. As undirected microtubule growth through dendrite branch points jeopardizes uniform microtubule polarity, we have used this system to understand how cells can maintain dynamic arrays of polarized microtubules. Results We find that growing microtubules navigate dendrite branch points by turning the same way, towards the cell body, 98% of the time, and that growing microtubules track along stable microtubules towards their plus ends. Using RNAi and genetic approaches, we show that kinesin-2, and the +TIPS EB1 and APC, are required for uniform dendrite microtubule polarity. Moreover, the protein-protein interactions and localization of Apc2-GFP and Apc-RFP to branch points suggests these proteins work together at dendrite branches. The functional importance of this polarity mechanism is demonstrated by the failure of neurons with reduced kinesin-2 to regenerate an axon from a dendrite. Conclusions We conclude that microtubule growth is directed at dendrite branch points, and that kinesin-2, APC and EB1 are likely to play a role in this process. We propose that is recruited to growing microtubules by +TIPS, and that the motor protein steers growing microtubules at branch points. This represents a newly discovered mechanism to maintain polarized arrays of microtubules.

Organelles such as neuropeptide-containing dense-core vesicles (DCVs) and mitochondria travel down axons to supply synaptic boutons. DCV distribution among en passant boutons in small axonal arbors is mediated by circulation with bidirectional capture. However, it is not known how organelles are distributed in extensive arbors associated with mammalian dopamine neuron vulnerability, and with volume transmission and neuromodulation by monoamines and neuropeptides. Therefore, we studied presynaptic organelle distribution in Drosophila octopamine neurons that innervate ∼20 muscles with ∼1500 boutons. Unlike in smaller arbors, distal boutons in these arbors contain fewer DCVs and mitochondria, although active zones are present. Absence of vesicle circulation is evident by proximal nascent DCV delivery, limited impact of retrograde transport and older distal DCVs. Traffic studies show that DCV axonal transport and synaptic capture are not scaled for extensive innervation, thus limiting distal delivery. Activity-induced synaptic endocytosis and synaptic neuropeptide release are also reduced distally. We propose that limits in organelle transport and synaptic capture compromise distal synapse maintenance and function in extensive axonal arbors, thereby affecting development, plasticity and vulnerability to neurodegenerative disease.

Axon injury elicits profound cellular changes, including axon regeneration. However, the full range of neuronal injury responses remains to be elucidated. Surprisingly, after axons of Drosophila dendritic arborization neurons were severed, dendrites were more resistant to injury-induced degeneration. Concomitant with stabilization, microtubule dynamics in dendrites increased. Moreover, dendrite stabilization was suppressed when microtubule dynamics was dampened, which was achieved by lowering levels of the microtubule nucleation protein γ-tubulin. Increased microtubule dynamics and global neuronal stabilization were also activated by expression of expanded polyglutamine (poly-Q) proteins SCA1, SCA3, and huntingtin. In all cases, dynamics were increased through microtubule nucleation and depended on JNK signaling, indicating that acute axon injury and long-term neuronal stress activate a common cytoskeleton-based stabilization program. Reducing levels of γ-tubulin exacerbated long-term degeneration induced by SCA3 in branched sensory neurons and in a well established Drosophila eye model of poly-Q-induced neurodegeneration. Thus, increased microtubule dynamics can delay short-term injury-induced degeneration, and, in the case of poly-Q proteins, can counteract progressive longer-term degeneration. We conclude that axon injury or stress triggers a microtubulebased neuroprotective pathway that stabilizes neurons against degeneration.M any animals generate a single set of neurons that must function for the entire life of the individual. Each neuron typically has a single axon that transmits signals to other neurons or output cells such as muscle. As axons can extend long distances, they are at risk for injury, and, if the single axon is damaged, the cell can no longer function. Many neurons thus mount major responses to axon injury. The best characterized of these responses is axon regeneration, the process in which a neuron extends the stump of the existing axon or grows a new axon from a dendrite (1-3).In addition to the regenerative response, axon injury can cause other less well-understood changes. For example, in mammalian dorsal root ganglion cells, injury of the peripheral axon causes a transcriptional response that increases the capacity of the central axon to regenerate if it is subsequently injured (4, 5). In Drosophila sensory neurons, axon injury causes cytoskeletal changes in the entire dendrite arbor, specifically the number of growing microtubules is up-regulated (6). In this study, we investigated the functional significance of the cytoskeletal changes in the dendrite arbor. We present results that suggest the altered microtubule dynamics in dendrites acts to stabilize them, and thus axon injury seems to trigger a neuroprotective pathway that acts on the rest of the cell. However, this neuroprotective pathway is turned on only transiently after axon injury and subsides as axon regeneration initiates.Axon injury is a very acute neuronal stress. Neurons are also subject to a variety of long-term stress...

Neurons have two types of processes: axons and dendrites. Axons have an active disassembly program activated by severing. It has not been tested whether dendrites have an analogous program. We sever Drosophila dendrites in vivo and find that they are cleared within 24 hours. Morphologically this clearance resembles developmental dendrite pruning, and, to some extent, axon degeneration. Like axon degeneration, both injury-induced dendrite degeneration and pruning can be delayed by expression of Wld(s) or UBP2. We therefore hypothesized that they use common machinery. Surprisingly, comparison of dendrite pruning and degeneration in the same cell demonstrated that none of the specific machinery used to prune dendrites is required for injury-induced dendrite degeneration. In addition, we show that the rapid program of dendrite degeneration does not require mitochondria. Thus dendrites do have a rapid program of degeneration, as do axons, but this program does not require the machinery used during developmental pruning.

Summary Axon regeneration allows neurons to repair circuits after trauma, but most of the molecular players remain to be identified. As microtubule rearrangements have been observed in injured neurons, we tested whether microtubule severing proteins might play a role in axon regeneration. We found that axon regeneration is extremely sensitive to levels of the microtubule severing protein spastin. While microtubule behavior in uninjured neurons was not perturbed in animals heterozygous for a spastin null allele, axon regeneration was severely disrupted in this background. Two types of axon regeneration, regeneration of an axon from a dendrite after proximal axotomy and regeneration of an axon from the stump after distal axotomy, were defective in Drosophila with one mutant copy of the spastin gene. Other types of axon and dendrite outgrowth, including regrowth of dendrites after pruning, were normal in heterozygotes. We conclude that regenerative axon growth is uniquely sensitive to spastin gene dosage.

After being severed from the cell body, axons initiate an active degeneration program known as Wallerian degeneration. Although dendrites also seem to have an active injury-induced degeneration program, no endogenous regulators of this process are known. Because microtubule disassembly has been proposed to play a role in both pruning and injury-induced degeneration, we used a Drosophila model to identify microtubule regulators involved in dendrite degeneration. We found that, when levels of fidgetin were reduced using mutant or RNA interference (RNAi) strategies, dendrite degeneration was delayed, but axon degeneration and dendrite pruning proceeded with normal timing. We explored two possible ways in which fidgetin could promote dendrite degeneration: (1) by acting constitutively to moderate microtubule stability in dendrites, or (2) by acting specifically after injury to disassemble microtubules. When comparing microtubule dynamics and stability in uninjured neurons with and without fidgetin, we could not find evidence that fidgetin regulated microtubule stability constitutively. However, we identified a fidgetin-dependent increase in microtubule dynamics in severed dendrites. We conclude that fidgetin acts after injury to promote disassembly of microtubules in dendrites severed from the cell body.

Many neurons influence their targets through co-release of neuropeptides and small-molecule transmitters. Neuropeptides are packaged into dense-core vesicles (DCVs) in the soma and then transported to synapses, while small-molecule transmitters such as monoamines are packaged by vesicular transporters that function at synapses. These separate packaging mechanisms point to activity, by inducing co-release as the sole scaler of co-transmission. Based on screening in Drosophila for increased presynaptic neuropeptides, the receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase (Rptp) Ptp4E was found to post-transcriptionally regulate neuropeptide content in single DCVs at octopamine synapses. This occurs without changing neuropeptide release efficiency, transport and DCV size measured by both stimulated emission depletion super-resolution and transmission electron microscopy. Ptp4E also controls the presynaptic abundance and activity of the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT), which packages monoamine transmitters for synaptic release. Thus, rather than rely on altering electrical activity, the Rptp regulates packaging underlying monoamine-neuropeptide co-transmission by controlling vesicular membrane transporter and luminal neuropeptide content.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.