This International Myeloma Working Group consensus updates the disease defi nition of multiple myeloma to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions). These changes are based on the identifi cation of biomarkers associated with near inevitable development of CRAB features in patients who would otherwise be regarded as having smouldering multiple myeloma. A delay in application of the label of multiple myeloma and postponement of therapy could be detrimental to these patients. In addition to this change, we clarify and update the underlying laboratory and radiographic variables that fulfi l the criteria for the presence of myeloma-defi ning CRAB features, and the histological and monoclonal protein requirements for the disease diagnosis. Finally, we provide specifi c metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease defi nition. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the implementation of these criteria in routine practice and in future clinical trials, and recommends that future studies analyse any diff erences in outcome that might occur as a result of the new disease defi nition.

Serum beta2-microglobulin (Sbeta2M), serum albumin, platelet count, serum creatinine, and age emerged as powerful predictors of survival and were then used in the tree analysis approach. A combination of Sbeta2M and serum albumin provided the simplest, most powerful and reproducible three-stage classification. This new International Staging System (ISS) was validated in the remaining patients and consists of the following stages: stage I, Sbeta2M less than 3.5 mg/L plus serum albumin > or = 3.5 g/dL (median survival, 62 months); stage II, neither stage I nor III (median survival, 44 months); and stage III, Sbeta2M > or = 5.5 mg/L (median survival, 29 months). The ISS system was further validated by demonstrating effectiveness in patients in North America, Europe, and Asia; in patients less than and > or = 65 years of age; in patients with standard therapy or autotransplantation; and in comparison with the Durie/Salmon staging system. CONCLUSION) The new ISS is simple, based on easy to use variables (Sbeta2M and serum albumin), and recommended for early adoption and widespread use.

Purpose The clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) is heterogeneous. A simple and reliable tool is needed to stratify MM patients. We combined the International Staging System (ISS) with chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (iFISH) after CD138 plasma cells purification and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to evaluate their prognostic value in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Methods Clinical and laboratory data from 4445 NDMM patients enrolled in eleven international trials were pooled together. The K-adaptive partitioning algorithm was used to define the most appropriate subgroups with homogeneous survival. Results ISS, CA, and LDH data were simultaneously available in 3060/4445 patients. We defined three groups: revised ISS (R-ISS) I (N=871), including ISS I (serum β2-microglobulin level <3.5mg/L and serum albumin level ≥3.5g/dL), no high-risk CA [del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)] and normal LDH level (below the upper limit of normal range); R-ISS III (N=295), including ISS III (serum β2-microglobulin level >5.5mg/L) and high-risk CA or high LDH level; R-ISS II (N=1894), including all the other possible combinations. At a median follow-up of 46 months, the 5-year OS was 82% in the R-ISS I, 62% in the R-ISS II, and 40% in the R-ISS III groups; the 5-year PFS was 55%, 36% and 24%, respectively. Conclusions The R-ISS is a simple and powerful prognostic staging system and we recommend its use in future clinical studies to stratify NDMM patients effectively with respect to the relative risk to their survival.

Promising new drugs are being evaluated for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), but their impact should be measured against the expected outcome in patients failing current therapies. However, the natural history of relapsed disease in the current era remains unclear. We studied 286 patients with relapsed MM, who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed, refractory, or ineligible, to an IMiD (Immunomodulatory Drug), with measurable disease and ECOG PS of 0, 1 or 2. The date patients satisfied the entry criteria was defined as time zero (T0). The median age at diagnosis was 58 years and time from diagnosis to T0 was 3.3 years. Following T0, 213 (74%) patients had a treatment recorded with one or more regimens (median=1; range 0-8). The first regimen contained bortezomib in 55 (26%) patients and an IMiD in 70 (33%). A minor response or better was seen to at least one therapy after T0 in 94 patients (51%) including >=partial response in 69 (38%). The median overall survival and event free survival from T0 were 9 and 5 months respectively. This study confirms the poor outcome once patients become refractory to current treatments. The results provide context for interpreting ongoing trials of new drugs.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is standard in many hematologic malignancies but is considered investigational in multiple myeloma (MM). We report a prospective analysis of the prognostic importance of MRD detection by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in 295 newly diagnosed MM patients uniformly treated in the GEM2000 protocol VBMCP/VBAD induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT]). MRD status by MFC was determined at day 100after ASCT. Progression-free survival (PFS; median 71 vs 37 months, P < .001) and overall survival (OS; median not reached vs 89 months, P ‫؍‬ .002) were longer in patients who were MRD negative versus MRD positive at day 100 after ASCT. Similar prognostic differentiation was seen in 147 patients who achieved immunofixation-negative complete response after ASCT. Moreover, MRD ؊ immunofixation-negative (IFx ؊ ) patients and MRD ؊ IFx ؉ patients had significantly longer PFS than MRD ؉ IFx ؊ patients. Multivariate analysis identified MRD status by MFC at day 100 after ASCT as the most important independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR ‫؍‬ 3.64, P ‫؍‬ . IntroductionIn most hematologic malignancies, response to front-line therapy is a good predictor of prognosis, with the longest survival seen in patients achieving an optimal response. This paradigm is represented by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), in which hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular remissions define progressively better response to therapy. In consequence, investigations to define these levels of remission are mandatory in routine clinical practice for treatment stratification and assessment of prognosis. 1 The situation is similar for other malignancies such as acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). 2,3 For this reason, there are continuous efforts to improve the sensitivity of the methods used to assess response to therapy, mainly through the introduction and refinement of both molecular and immunophenotyping approaches, as well as imaging techniques.Multiple myeloma (MM) should be no exception to this paradigm. For many years, the major goal of MM therapy was to achieve partial response (PR) or disease stabilization. 4,5 With the introduction of high-dose therapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT), the new goal became the achievement of complete response (CR), defined as absence of M-protein by immunofixation (IFx) and less than 5% plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow (BM). 6,7 More recently, the International Myeloma Working Group proposed a new response category of "stringent CR," which requires normalization of the free light chain ratio and the absence of residual clonal cells in the BM by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence. 8 As noted previously, the assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD), residual tumor cells persisting after therapy, is part of the standard of care in many hematologic malignancies, whereas in MM this is still considered investigational. Thus, MRD studies in MM have involved mainly small series of patients or have...

Key Points• MRD assessment by sequencing is prognostic of TTP and OS in multiple myeloma patients.• Among patients in complete response, MRD assessment by sequencing enables identification of 2 distinct subgroups with different TTP.We assessed the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in multiple myeloma (MM) patients using a sequencing-based platform in bone marrow samples from 133 MM patients in at least very good partial response (VGPR) after front-line therapy.Deep sequencing was carried out in patients in whom a high-frequency myeloma clone was identified and MRD was assessed using the IGH-VDJ H , IGH-DJ H , and IGK assays. The results were contrasted with those of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and allelespecific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR).

In an intention-to-treat analysis, the post-ASCT CR rate was higher with VTD than with TD (46% vs 24%, P ‫؍‬ .004) or with VBMCP/ VBAD/B (46% vs 38%, P ‫؍‬ .1). Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a shorter PFS and overall survival in the overall series and in all treatment groups. In conclusion, VTD resulted in a higher preand posttransplantation CR rate and in a significantly longer PFS although it was not able to overcome the poor prognosis of high-risk cytogenetics. Our results support the use of VTD as a highly effective induction regimen prior to ASCT. The study was registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00461747) and Eudra CT (no.

Recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have increased the need for accurate diagnosis of the disease. The detection of bone and bone marrow lesions is crucial in the work-up of MM, and often dictates the decision to start treatment. Furthermore, detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is important for prognosis and treatment planning, and has underscored an unmet need for sensitive imaging modalities that accurately assess response to therapy in MM. Low dose whole body computed tomography (WBCT) has increased sensitivity compared to conventional skeletal survey (CSS) in the detection of bone disease, and can reveal information leading to changes in therapy and management that could prevent or delay the onset of significant morbidity and mortality related to skeletal-related events. Given the multiple options for detection of bone and bone marrow lesions ranging from CSS to WBCT, positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the International Myeloma Working Group has established guidelines on the optimal and standardized use of imaging modalities in different stages of the disease. These recommendations on imaging within and outside of clinical trials will help to standardize the imaging worldwide in order to allow comparison of results and unification of treatment approaches.