• Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) without cathartic preparation is well accepted by patients • Cathartic-free faecal tagging CTC yields high positive predictive values • CTC without cathartic preparation could improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening.
Background/Objectives: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare tumour with poor prognosis. Due to the increased number of patients with PCNSL over the past two decades our purpose are to describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) findings in (PCNSL) of the brain, and to study the differences between immunocompetent and immunodeficient patients with PCNSL.
Methods:A retrospective, descriptive study was performed with 59 patients diagnosed of PCNSL in two hospitals from 1997 to 2010. Immunocompetent (n=38) and immunodeficient (n=21) patients were compared and differences between both groups were analyzed. Patients were evaluated according to sex, age, median time from clinical symptoms presentation to pathologic diagnosis, clinical symptoms, location, number of lesions, size, MRI and CT characteristics. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.Results: MRI findings: 50% of lesions in immunocompetent and 52.4% in immunodeficient group were heterogeneous, 89.5% of lesions in immunocompetent and 85,7% in immunodeficient were hypo-isointense on T1WI; 63.2% of lesions in immunocompetent and 76.2% in immunodeficient group were hyperintense on T2WI. CT images: 48.39% of lesions in immunocompetent and 20% in immunodeficient group were hyperdense. Statistically significant differences between immunocompetent and immunodeficient patients were found when evaluating the age (p < 0.000) and median time from clinical symptoms presentation to pathologic diagnosis (p < 0.008).Conclusions: MRI and CT are able to define imaging characteristics of PCNSL, promoting a quick diagnosis. There are no significant differences between immunocompetent and immunodeficient patients for MR and CT features.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.