BackgroundThe purpose of the study was to test the hypothesis that strengthening health systems, through improved leadership and management skills of health teams, can contribute to an increase in health-service delivery outcomes. The study was conducted in six provinces in the Republic of Kenya.MethodsThe study used a non-randomized design comparing measures of key service delivery indicators addressed by health teams receiving leadership and management training (the intervention) against measures in comparison areas not receiving the intervention. Measurements were taken at three time periods: baseline, endline, and approximately six months post intervention. At the district level, health-service coverage was computed. At the facility level, the percentage change in the number of client visits was computed. The t-test was used to test for significance.ResultsResults showed significant increases in health-service coverage at the district level (p = <0.05) in the intervention teams compared to the comparison teams. Similarly, there were significant increases in the number of client visits at the facility level in the intervention group versus comparison facilities (P < 0.05).ConclusionsStrengthening the leadership and management skills of health teams, through team-based approaches focused on selected challenges, contributed to improved health service delivery outcomes and these improvements were sustained at least for six months.

Health programmers and researchers must collaborate despite different mandates and technical languages. A results framework is a simple model that both disciplines can use to understand complexity, clarify assumptions and hypotheses, design programs, and ask questions to inform action research. Typically, a health program's results framework has 3 tiers and 6 boxes: a base of 4 health service intermediate results (access, quality, demand, and environment), which lead to a midlevel strategic objective (use of life-saving intervention), which leads to the goal (improved health). A situation analysis directly informs intervention selection; more difficult is selecting strategies to deliver the interventions, especially in settings of health system weakness. We propose menus and submenus of strategies to achieve each intermediate result, illustrate the use of the results framework in a program design and in clarifying research questions, and begin to propose a research agenda for "delivery scientists" responsible for recommending optimal investments to maximize use of interventions by those who need them most.