Vertical jump height is frequently used by coaches, health care professionals, and strength and conditioning professionals to objectively measure function. The purpose of this study is to determine the concurrent validity of the jump and reach method (Vertec) and the contact mat method (Just Jump) in assessing vertical jump height when compared with the criterion reference 3-camera motion analysis system. Thirty-nine college students, 25 females and 14 males between the ages of 18 and 25 (mean age 20.65 years), were instructed to perform the countermovement jump. Reflective markers were placed at the base of the individual's sacrum for the 3-camera motion analysis system to measure vertical jump height. The subject was then instructed to stand on the Just Jump mat beneath the Vertec and perform the jump. Measurements were recorded from each of the 3 systems simultaneously for each jump. The Pearson r statistic between the video and the jump and reach (Vertec) was 0.906. The Pearson r between the video and contact mat (Just Jump) was 0.967. Both correlations were significant at the 0.01 level. Analysis of variance showed a significant difference among the 3 means F(2,235) = 5.51, p < 0.05. The post hoc analysis showed a significant difference between the criterion reference (M = 0.4369 m) and the Vertec (M = 0.3937 m, p = 0.005) but not between the criterion reference and the Just Jump system (M = 0.4420 m, p = 0.972). The Just Jump method of measuring vertical jump height is a valid measure when compared with the 3-camera system. The Vertec was found to have a high correlation with the criterion reference, but the mean differed significantly. This study indicates that a higher degree of confidence is warranted when comparing Just Jump results with a 3-camera system study.

No abstract

Context X-Linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a lifelong metabolic disease with musculoskeletal comorbidities that dominate the adult clinical presentation. Objective The adult XLH disorder has yet to be quantified on the basis of the physical and functional limitations that can affect activities of daily living. Our goal was to report the impact of the musculoskeletal manifestations on physical function. Design and setting Musculoskeletal function was evaluated by validated questionnaires and in an interdisciplinary clinical space where participants underwent full-body radiologic imaging, goniometric range of motion (ROM) measurements, general performance tests, and kinematic gait analysis. Patients Nine adults younger than 60 years with a diagnosis of XLH and self-reported musculoskeletal disability, but able to independently ambulate, were selected to participate. Passive ROM and gait analysis were also performed on age-approximated controls to account for differences between individual laboratory instrumentation. Results Enthesophytes, degenerative arthritis, and osteophytes were found to be consistently bilateral and diffusely present at the spine and synovial joints across participants, with predominance at weight-bearing joints. Passive ROM in adults with XLH was decreased at the cervical spine, hip, knee, and ankle compared to controls. Gait analysis relative to controls revealed increased step width, markedly increased lateral trunk sway, and physical restriction at the hip, knees, and ankle joints that translated into limitations through the gait cycle. Conclusions The functional impact of XLH musculoskeletal comorbidities supports the necessity for creating an interprofessional health-care team with the goal of establishing a longitudinal plan of care that considers the manifestations of XLH across the lifespan.

No abstract