The role of voltage-gated and ligand-gated ion channels in epileptogenesis of both genetic and acquired epilepsies, and as targets in the development of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is reviewed. Voltage-gated Na+ channels are essential for action potentials, and their mutations are the substrate for generalised epilepsy with febrile seizures plus and benign familial neonatal infantile seizures; Na+ channel inhibition is the primary mechanism of carbamazepine, phenytoin and lamotrigine, and is a probable mechanism for many other classic and novel AEDs. Voltage-gated K+ channels are essential in the repolarisation and hyperpolarisation that follows paroxysmal depolarisation shifts (PDSs), and their mutations are the substrate for the benign neonatal epilepsy and episodic ataxia type 1; they are new targets for AEDs such as retigabine. Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels are involved in neurotransmitter release, in the sustained depolarisation-phase of PDSs, and in the generation of absence seizures; their mutations are a substrate for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and the absence-like pattern seen in some mice; the antiabsence effect of ethosuximide is due to the inhibition of thalamic T-type Ca2+ channels. Voltage-gated Cl- channels are implicated in GABA(A) transmission, and mutations in these channels have been described in some families with juvenile myoclonic epilepsies, epilepsy with grand mal seizures on awakening or juvenile absence epilepsy. Hyperpolarisation-activated cation channels have been implicated in spike-wave seizures and in hippocampal epileptiform discharges. The Cl- ionophore of the GABA(A) receptor is responsible for the rapid post-PDS hyperpolarisation, it has been involved in epileptogenesis both in animals and humans, and mutations in these receptors have been found in families with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy or generalised epilepsy with febrile seizures plus; enhancement of GABA(A) inhibitory transmission is the primary mechanism of benzodiazepines and phenobarbital and is a mechanistic approach to the development of novel AEDs such as tiagabine or vigabatrin. Altered GABA(B)-receptor function is implicated in spike-wave seizures. Ionotropic glutamate receptors are implicated in the sustained depolarisation phase of PDS and in epileptogenesis both in animals and humans; felbamate, phenobarbital and topiramate block these receptors, and attenuation of glutamatergic excitatory transmission is another new mechanistic approach. Mutations in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor are the substrates for the nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. The knowledge of the role of the ion channels in the epilepsies is allowing the design of new and more specific therapeutic strategies.

The rate of onset of side effects was examined in 392 pediatric outpatients who received long-term monotherapy with phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), or valproate (VPA) for epilepsy or febrile convulsions. The severity of side effects (based on need to alter treatment), the nature of each drug's most common side effects, and the doses and plasma levels of occurrence were recorded. Our results show that usually accepted therapeutic ranges are well tolerated. Indeed, although some form of side effect occurred in 50% of patients, treatment had to be changed in only 18% and the drug had to be stopped in only 7%. In decreasing order, the rates for side effects were PHT (71%) greater than PB (64%) greater than CBZ (43%) greater than VPA (43%) greater than PRM (29%). Serious side effects requiring withdrawal of treatment occurred at the following rates: PHT (10%) greater than VPA (8%) greater than PRM (8%) greater than PB (4%) greater than CBZ (3%). Among our patients, the best tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) was CBZ, and the least tolerated was PHT. Behavioral disorders were most common with PB, neurologic disorders with PHT, digestive tract disorders with VPA, and gingival hyperplasia and hirsutism with PHT. Behavioral disorders involving excitement seen with PB and PRM occurred most commonly at low plasma levels. Behavioral disorders involving depression seen with PB and VPA, those involving excitement seen with PHT and VPA, and digestive disorders seen with VPA occurred particularly when plasma levels were high.

Epilepsy drug-resistance may depend on the metabolism of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), transport to the epileptic focus and/or target sensitivity. Furthermore, drug response depends on multiple characteristics of the patient, the epilepsy, and the antiepileptic drugs used. We have investigated the association between polymorphisms related to antiepileptic drug metabolism (CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and UGT), transport (ABCB1), and targets (SCN1A) both in a crude analysis and after adjusting by clinical factors associated with drug-resistance, and stratifying by patient age or aetiology of epilepsy. Caucasian outpatients (N=289), children (N=80) and adolescent-adults (N=209), with idiopathic (N=69), cryptogenic (N=97) or symptomatic epilepsies (N=123) were selected when they had either drug-resistance (with at least four seizures over the previous year after treatment with more than three appropriate AEDs at appropriate doses) or drug responsiveness (without seizures for at least a year). Samples were genotyped by allelic discrimination using TaqMan probes. No significant association between polymorphisms and drug-resistance was found either in the crude analysis or in the adjusted analysis. However, adults with the ABCB1_3435TT or 2677TT genotypes had a lower risk of drug-resistance than those with the CC or the GG genotypes. Furthermore, patients with symptomatic epilepsies with the ABCB1_3435CT or TT genotypes had a lower risk of drug-resistance than those with the CC genotype. An opposite but insignificant tendency was found in children and in idiopathic epilepsies. Although replication studies will be needed to confirm our results, they suggest that stratification by patient age and by the aetiology of epilepsy could contribute to unmask the association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and drug-resistance of epilepsy.

Using bivariate and multivariate methods, we retrospectively analyzed the influence of patient age and the use of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the lamotrigine (LTG) concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio in samples from 164 patients (68 children, 96 adults) with epilepsy receiving LTG alone (n = 28) or in combination with various antiepileptic drugs (n = 136). The LTG C/D ratio increased with age in children receiving LTG alone (r = 0.60, p < 0.01), but decreased with age in adults receiving LTG and inducers (r = -0.42, p < 0.001). In patients receiving LTG and inducers, the ratio was statistically lower in those younger than 9 years of age (0.23 +/- 0.08) and older than 30 years of age (0.32 +/- 0.15) than it was in those between 9 and 30 years of age (0.44 +/- 0.15). The mean LTG C/D ratio was 0.37 +/- 0.15 in patients receiving LTG and inducers (n = 92), 0.84 +/- 0.41 in patients receiving LTG alone (n = 28), 1.09 +/- 0.44 in those receiving LTG with VPA plus inducers (n = 17), and 3.41 +/- 1.18 in those receiving LTG and VPA (n = 27). Differences in the LTG C/D ratio between treatment groups were similar in children and in adults. We reached the following conclusions: The LTG C/D ratio increased with age in children but may decrease with age in adults receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs; the LTG C/D ratio was 10 times lower in patients receiving LTG and inducers than in those receiving LTG and VPA (in both children and adults), and this difference was higher than the four-fold difference described for LTG half-life and the two-fold differences currently used in LTG dosage.

The incidence of toxicity associated with the use of valproic acid (VPA) is considered remarkably low compared to other antiepileptic drugs. This study reports the toxicity of VPA administered as a single drug to 88 children in relation to the daily dose and drug plasma level. The frequency of side effects observed clinically was 42.0%, but it increased to 80.7% when a questionnaire was introduced. In spite of the limitations of this method, the results show the need to perform systematic surveillance for side effects of all antiepileptic drugs, similar to those made to assess their clinical effectiveness. Anorexia, vomiting, and sleep alterations were the most common side effects detected in the clinical record; patients who showed anorexia, hyperactivity, lassitude, sleep disturbances, and sadness had received daily doses significantly higher than patients not showing side effects. Similarly, the children who needed to reduce or discontinue the treatment were receiving the highest doses. No relations, however, could be established between the incidence of side effects and plasma levels of VPA except for lassitude and drowsiness. Severe or fatal toxicity was not detected.

The effectiveness and toxicity of phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), and sodium valproate (VPA), used exclusively in monotherapy, were compared in 95 children affected with febrile convulsions. Treatment was restricted to either complicated or simple febrile convulsions with risk factors. The effectiveness and toxicity of each drug were related to the daily dose and the steady-state plasma levels. PB (4.8 +/- 0.7 mg/kg/day) achieved plasma levels of 16.4 +/- 2.8 micrograms/ml and prevented febrile convulsions in 80% of the patients. Side effects were observed in 76.7% of the patients, a change in dose being required only in 13.3%. PRM (17.8 mg/kg/day) yielded PB plasma levels of 14.1 +/- 3.7 micrograms/ml and was effective in 88.2% of the patients. The incidence of side effects was 53%, but no change in treatment was required. VPA (35.2 +/- 5.9 mg/kg/day) achieved plasma levels of 57.2 +/- 15.3 micrograms/ml (measured before the first dose in the morning) and was effective in 91.7% of the patients. Side effects were detected in 45% (significantly lower than after PB, p less than 0.01), and required a change in treatment in 14.3%. No differences in doses and plasma levels were found between patients with or without recurrence of febrile convulsions and with or without side effects; an exception was the higher doses of VPA administered to patients who showed side effects. It is concluded that PRM and VPA were at least as effective and well tolerated as PB. Because the plasma levels of the three drugs were near the lower limit of the therapeutic range, it remains to be elucidated whether higher doses may increase the benefit without adding unacceptable toxicity.

The ability of nimodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, to reduce the daily dose of oral morphine in cancer patients who had developed dose escalation, was tested in 54 patients under randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions. We selected patients that required at least two successive increments of morphine to maintain pain relief. A possible pharmacokinetic interaction between nimodipine and morphine was also studied in 14 patients by assaying steady-state serum levels of morphine and its 3- and 6-glucuronides. A total of 30 patients completed the study, 14 and 16 in the nimodipine and placebo groups, respectively. Nimodipine controlled the escalation of the morphine dose in 9 patients (65%), and placebo in 4 (28%), the difference being statistically significant (P=0.03). The dose of morphine was reduced from 313+/-52 to 174+/-33 mg/day (P < 0.001) in the nimodipine group, and from 254+/-26 to 218+/-19 mg/day (not significant) in the placebo group. The percentages of reduction in the daily dose of morphine also showed significant differences between both groups (P=0.02). One week after introducing nimodipine or placebo, while the dose of morphine remained similar to that of the pre-test week, the serum levels of morphine and its glucuronides were not modified significantly. We conclude that the introduction of nimodipine in patients chronically treated with morphine may be a safe alternative to reduce the daily requirements of the opioid. It is suggested that interference with Ca2+-related events may attenuate the development and/or expression of tolerance to morphine in a clinically relevant way.

Lamotrigine (LTG) is metabolized by UGT1A4 but UGT2B7 also contributes to its glucuronidation. The aim of this study was to determine whether UGT2B7_- 161C>T and UGT2B7_372A>G polymorphisms contribute to the intersubject variability in LTG concentration-to-dose ratio (LTG-CDR) in epileptic patients. Fifty-three white epileptic patients attending the Neuropediatric and Neurology Services at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, in whom LTG serum concentration was to be measured for pharmacokinetic monitoring, were selected according to predefined criteria for LTG-CDR evaluation. All patients had at least one steady-state LTG serum concentration obtained before the first dose in the morning. Patients were classified in 3 groups of comedication: (1) LTG in combination with metabolism-inducer anticonvulsants (n = 22), (2) LTG in combination with valproate (n = 13), and (3) LTG as monotherapy (n = 16) or in combination with valproate and inducers (n = 2). Genotypes were determined by Applied Biosystems Genotyping Assays with TaqMan probes. A significant association was found between LTG-CDR and UGT2B7_-161C>T polymorphism (P = 0.021) when patient age and concomitant antiepileptic drugs were taken into account. Comedication explained 70% of the LTG-CDR variability, patient age 24%, and UGT2B7_-161C>T 12%. In contrast, a significant association between LTG-CDR and this polymorphism was not found in the bivariate study when age and comedication groups were not considered. A significant association between UGT2B7_372A>G and LTG-CDR was not found in the bivariate or the multivariate studies. UGT2B7_-161C>T polymorphism is significantly associated with LTG-CDR when comedication with other antiepileptic drugs and patient age are taken into account in a multivariate analysis.