The effect of dietary education incorporating information about the glycaemic index of carbohydrate was tested against standard dietary advice in a randomized controlled study in 51 newly diagnosed patients with Type 2 diabetes treated as out-patients with diet only over a 12-week study period. Outcome was assessed by dietary analysis of 3-day diet diaries, fasting blood glucose, fructosamine, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides. Dietary analysis indicated that the group who received low glycaemic advice not only had a significantly lower calculated mean diet glycaemic index intake (77 +/- 1.1 (SEM) vs 82 +/- 1%, p < 0.01) but also had a lower fat intake (25 +/- 1 vs 32 +/- 2% of total energy day-1, p < 0.001), a higher carbohydrate intake (49 +/- 2% vs 44 +/- 1% of total energy day-1, p < 0.05) and non-starch polysaccharide intake (21 +/- 1.5 vs 14 +/- 1 g, p < 0.01). There was a significantly greater within-group fall in fructosamine (3.8 +/- 0.2 to 3.2 +/- 0.2 mmol-1 vs 3.6 +/- 0.2 to 3.6 +/- 0.3 mmol-1, p < 0.05) and cholesterol (6.1 +/- 0.3 to 5.4 +/- 0.3 mmol-1 vs. 5.6 +/- 0.2 to 5.3 +/- 0.1 mmol-1, p < 0.05) in the low glycaemic index group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.