In the early 1980s it was well established that Leray solutions of the unforced Navier–Stokes equations in Rn decay in energy norm for large t. With the works of T. Miyakawa, M. Schonbek and others it is now known that the energy decay rate cannot in general be any faster than t−(n+2)/4 and is typically much slower. In contrast, we show in this note that, given an arbitrary Leray solution u(·,t), the difference of any two Stokes approximations to the Navier–Stokes flow u(·,t) will always decay at least as fast as t−(n+2)/4, no matter how slow the decay of ∥u(·,t)∥L2(Rn) might be.
In the early 1980s it was well established that Leray solutions of the unforced Navier-Stokes equations in Rn decay in energy norm for large time. With the works of T. Miyakawa, M. Schonbek and others it is now known that the energy decay rate cannot in general be any faster than t^-(n+2)/4 and is typically much slower. In contrast, we show in this note that, given an arbitrary Leray solution u(.,t), the difference of any two Stokes approximations to the Navier-Stokes flow u(.,t) will always decay at least as fast as t^-(n+2)/4, no matter how slow the decay of || u(.,t) ||_L2 might happen to be.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.